The South Florida Bulls aren’t rebuilding anymore—they’re reloading.
After posting a 7-6 record in 2024 and winning a marathon five-overtime Hawaii Bowl thriller against San Jose State, Coach Alex Golesh’s squad has transformed from a perennial doormat to a legitimate conference threat. The bowl victory wasn’t just a feel-good ending to a solid season—it was a declaration that USF football has officially awakened from its half-decade slumber.
But the real question facing Bulls fans now isn’t whether their team can reach another bowl game.
It’s whether USF is ready to challenge for an American Athletic Conference championship.
The 2024 Breakthrough Nobody Saw Coming
Last season marked a dramatic shift in South Florida’s football fortunes.
A 7-6 overall record (4-4 in AAC play) ended a streak of four consecutive losing seasons
The offense exploded for 32.2 points per game (33rd nationally)
Record-breaking performances included 425 rushing yards against Charlotte and 715 total yards versus Tulsa
A Hawaii Bowl victory that required five overtimes became the longest bowl game in FBS history
“We’re finally establishing the foundation of what this program can be,” Golesh told reporters after the Hawaii Bowl. “This isn’t a finished product by any means, but we’ve taken significant steps forward.”
The 2024 campaign wasn’t just about wins and losses but about creating a new identity.
Byrum Brown: The Dual-Threat Engine That Powers Everything
Quarterback stability changes everything for a college football program.
Brown returns for his third season after setting multiple school records when he was healthy.
Despite playing just 6 games in 2024, he compiled 836 passing yards with a 59.1% completion rate.
His dual-threat capabilities make USF’s offense particularly difficult to prepare for
The team’s offensive production jumped dramatically in games Brown started and finished.
When examining the statistical differences between USF’s wins and losses last season, one trend is becoming increasingly clear. When the offense clicked (485.1 yards per game in victories vs. 317.3 in defeats), the Bulls became nearly unstoppable.
Brown’s health might be the most crucial factor in determining USF’s 2025 ceiling.
The Transfer Portal Cavalry Has Arrived
The Bulls attacked the transfer portal with surgical precision this offseason.
Offensive Line Reinforcements: Stanford transfer Connor McLaughlin (6’7″, 260 lbs) and Appalachian State transfer Thomas Shrader (6’5″, 305 lbs) bring immediate size and experience
Backfield Boost: Charlotte transfer Cartevious Norton (RB, 5’11”, 210 lbs) provides a power-running complement
Defensive Upgrades: Wisconsin transfer Jonas Duclona (DB) and Texas A&M transfer Josh Celiscar (DE, 6’4″, 230 lbs) address the pass defense issues
Special Teams Overhaul: New kicker Adam Zouagui (Davidson) and punter Chase Leon (Lamar) fix last season’s inconsistent specialists
“We identified specific needs and targeted players who can make immediate impacts,” Golesh said regarding the transfer strategy. “It’s about finding the right fits culturally while addressing positional gaps evident last season.”
The transfer additions aren’t just depth pieces—they’re potential game-changers at critical positions.
The 2025 Schedule: Early Tests, Conference Opportunities
USF’s path to contention features both landmines and golden opportunities.
Non-Conference Challenges:
Aug. 28: vs. Boise State (Season Opener at Raymond James Stadium)
Sept. 6: at Florida
Sept. 13: at Miami
Sept. 20: vs. South Carolina State
AAC Home Opportunities:
Charlotte (defeated 59-24 in 2024)
Florida Atlantic (defeated 44-21 in 2024)
UTSA
Rice
AAC Road Battles:
North Texas
Memphis
Navy
UAB
The early-season gauntlet against Boise State, Florida, and Miami provides statement opportunities that could supercharge the program’s momentum—or expose lingering weaknesses.
Fixing The Defense: USF’s Championship Roadblock
The glaring weakness that kept USF from greater heights last season wasn’t hard to identify.
The defense surrendered 29.8 points per game (99th nationally)
Opponents averaged 278.8 passing yards per game against the Bulls secondary
The -0.5 turnover margin per game prevented the team from controlling close contests
Even in victories, the defense rarely dominated opponents
“Defensively, we’re not where we need to be yet,” Golesh acknowledged. “That’s an area where we simply have to make substantial improvements if we want to compete for championships.”
The additions of Duclona, Celiscar, and Charlotte transfer Dre Butler (DL, 6’5″, 280 lbs) directly address these defensive vulnerabilities.
Whether these reinforcements can transform the unit will determine if USF is merely competitive or truly dangerous in 2025.
5 Keys To USF Becoming AAC Champions
For South Florida to make the leap from surprising bowl team to championship contender, five critical developments must occur:
QB Stability: Byrum Brown must remain healthy for all 12+ games while continuing his development as a passer
Defensive Evolution: The defense needs to trim at least 7-8 points from its points-allowed average (29.8 in 2024)
Turnover Improvement: Championship teams typically win the turnover battle, not lose it (USF was -0.5 per game in 2024)
Road Warrior Mentality: With tough trips to Florida, Miami, Memphis, and Navy, the Bulls must improve on last year’s 3-3 road record
Transfer Integration: The new additions must assimilate quickly, particularly on the offensive line and in the defensive secondary
The margin between 7-5 and 10-2 in college football often comes down to execution in these fundamental areas.
Winning close games separates champions from also-rans.
The Bottom Line: Bulls Are Charging Up The AAC Hierarchy
South Florida football has evolved from afterthought to contender in just two seasons under Alex Golesh.
With Byrum Brown directing an offense with explosive potential, improved protection from transfer offensive linemen, and defensive reinforcements addressing the team’s primary weaknesses, USF has positioned itself as a legitimate threat to win 8-9 games and compete for an AAC championship game berth.
“We’re building something that isn’t just about one good season,” Golesh emphasized after the Hawaii Bowl victory. “This is about establishing a program that competes for championships year after year. We’ve taken steps, but the journey is just beginning.”
For a program that wandered through the football wilderness for half a decade, that journey now has a clear direction.
The Bulls aren’t just back—they’re hunting bigger prey.
Become an Insider
Don’t miss another deep dive into college football’s most crucial storylines and program developments. Our team-by-team analysis gives you the insider perspective to understand where each program is headed in 2025 and beyond. Subscribe for free now to access our comprehensive breakdowns, exclusive hot seat rankings, and in-depth conference analysis delivered to your inbox. Join thousands of college football insiders who trust Coaches Hot Seat to keep them ahead of the game. Hit the link below to unlock all our premium content and never miss another update.
Every head coach in college football lives on borrowed time.
Some seats are scorching, others are comfortably cool—but all of them can change temperature in a single season. After our month-long deep dive into each ACC program, we’ve analyzed the numbers, parsed the press conferences, and applied our proprietary algorithms to rank every ACC coach’s job security heading into the 2025 season.
Here’s the definitive ranking of who’s feeling the heat and who’s sitting pretty:
1. Tony Elliott (Virginia)
Elliott’s seat isn’t just hot—it’s practically molten. With an abysmal 11-23 record (.324 winning percentage) that falls dramatically below our “Minimum Acceptable” threshold of .419 for UVA, Elliott enters 2025 needing at least eight wins to save his job. His inability to win close games (4-8 in one-score contests) and a complete offensive identity crisis have exhausted nearly all goodwill in Charlottesville. Even a $15 million NIL payroll and aggressive transfer portal strategy might not be enough to overcome three years of disappointment. With the Athletic Director’s contract expiring in June 2025, Elliott faces a likely “win or walk” ultimatum.
Four consecutive 3-9 seasons have Stanford football fans wondering if they’re trapped in a cruel time loop. Taylor’s .250 winning percentage (6-18) falls dramatically below what our analysts calculate as the minimum acceptable threshold of .506 for Stanford coaches. The most fascinating development is the unprecedented hiring of Cardinal legend Andrew Luck as General Manager—a move that signals Stanford recognizes business as usual isn’t working. Taylor’s saving grace might be his recruiting success, including landing promising quarterback Bear Bachmeier for the 2025 class. However, with sophomore Elijah Brown taking over at quarterback and significant holes remaining on defense, Taylor must show meaningful progress to avoid becoming another casualty of Stanford’s fall from relevance.
After the most dramatic year-to-year collapse in college football history—from 13-1 ACC Champions to a disastrous 2-10 season—Norvell’s $54.4 million buyout keeps him employed. The problem isn’t just wins and losses; it’s a fundamental cultural disconnect. Despite contributing $4.5 million of his 2025 salary toward fundraising, Norvell’s heavy reliance on the transfer portal (with 16 new transfers ranking as the No. 5 class nationally) has created a roster with limited emotional investment in what it means to be a Seminole. If Norvell can’t reconnect players to Florida State’s traditions and pride while dramatically improving results, even that massive buyout won’t save him.
Pry has pushed all his chips to the center of the table after a mediocre 6-6 season in 2024 and a 16-21 overall record through three years. He’s completely revamped his coaching staff, hiring Philip Montgomery (Baylor/Tulsa) as offensive coordinator and Sam Siefkes to lead the defense. The Hokies also face significant roster turnover with over 30 new players, including transfers like Cameron Seldon (Tennessee) and Sherrod Covil Jr. (Clemson). The good news? Kyron Drones returns at quarterback after showing flashes of brilliance in 2024. The bad news? Another 6-6 season might not be enough to save Pry’s job as national analysts like ESPN’s Adam Rittenberg and The Athletic’s Andy Staples have explicitly identified him as being on thin ice.
Wilcox has reached his breaking point at Cal. His current .457 winning percentage sits below the “Minimum Acceptable” threshold of .490, and the program shows alarming signs of stagnation after three consecutive mediocre seasons (4-8 in 2022, 6-7 in 2023, 6-7 in 2024). What makes Cal’s situation particularly fascinating is Wilcox’s contract through 2027 with a massive $15 million buyout. Sensing the pressure, Wilcox has made a bold move: completely overhauling his offense by hiring former Auburn head coach Bryan Harsin as offensive coordinator and controversial former Washington State coach Nick Rolovich as senior offensive assistant. With new Chancellor Rich Lyons (the first Cal undergraduate to hold the position in nearly a century) already talking about making football “self-supporting,” 2025 represents a referendum on Wilcox’s tenure and the program’s direction.
After Miami’s impressive 10-3 record and College Football Playoff appearance in 2024, it might seem strange to find Cristobal this high in our hot-seat rankings. However, his .579 winning percentage still falls below the .670 minimum acceptable winning percentage established by our metrics for a program with 5 national championships. More troublingly, in each of Cristobal’s three seasons, Miami has lost at least three of their final four games—a pattern suggesting structural problems in program conditioning, depth, or coaching adjustments. Despite his massive $80 million, 10-year contract with a reported $62 million buyout, Cristobal faces legitimate expectations in 2025: at least 10 regular season wins, an ACC Championship appearance, meaningful victories against Notre Dame and Florida, and a prestigious bowl victory. With Georgia transfer Carson Beck taking over at QB, Cristobal has the pieces for a special season—if he can solve his November fade problem.
After an inexplicable 2024 season where the Panthers started 7-0 before losing six straight to finish 7-6, Narduzzi finds himself in unfamiliar territory—the hot seat. Despite a decent overall record (72-56, .563) and the 2021 ACC Championship, back-to-back disappointing seasons have fans restless. What makes Narduzzi’s situation particularly fascinating is his rumored $30 million buyout that runs through 2030. The quarterback competition between sophomore Eli Holstein and freshman Mason Heintschel will likely determine both Pitt’s ceiling and Narduzzi’s job security. Most critically, Narduzzi must solve the team’s fourth-quarter collapses and November mental toughness issues that defined their 2024 implosion.
After 12 seasons, 87 wins, and zero ACC Championship appearances, Doeren faces the classic “good but not great” dilemma. His 44-46 ACC record and disappointing 6-7 campaign in 2024 have Wolfpack fans asking uncomfortable questions. Despite a contract through 2029 and a $15.7 million buyout, Doeren clearly feels the pressure—he’s completely overhauled his coaching staff, promoting Kurt Roper to offensive coordinator and hiring D.J. Eliot and Charlton Warren to lead the defense. If another mediocre season unfolds, AD Boo Corrigan might finally be forced to make the difficult conversation about whether NC State needs new leadership to reach the next level.
After back-to-back 7-6 campaigns, Key has positioned Georgia Tech for what could be their most successful season in years. The Yellow Jackets rank 26th nationally and 3rd in the ACC in returning production—bringing back 64% of their offensive and 65% of their defensive production, including star quarterback Haynes King (72.9% completion rate), leading rusher Jamal Haynes, and top receiver Malik Rutherford. Their 2024 season showed flashes of greatness, including upsets of Florida State and Miami, plus pushing Georgia to eight overtimes. With a third year in offensive coordinator Buster Faulkner’s system, a favorable schedule, and returning talent, the Yellow Jackets have all the ingredients for a special season. The one glaring weakness Key must address? A pass rush that generated just 18 sacks all season (last in the ACC).
We have Key listed as “WARM” on our hot seat meter only because his winning record of .529 is below the Georgia Tech minimum standard of .534. However, we think Georgia Tech could emerge as the surprise team in the ACC this season (which would move Key’s Hot Seat status to COOL.)
Brown faces a pivotal second year after an impressive 10-3 debut season that included victories over three AP-ranked teams and a Holiday Bowl win over Washington State. Now comes the hard part: proving it wasn’t just a one-year wonder. Syracuse has lost several cornerstone players, including record-setting quarterback Kyle McCord (4,779 yards, 34 TDs) and dynamic running back LeQuint Allen (1,021 rushing yards, 521 receiving yards, 20 total TDs). The Orange face what might be college football’s most demanding schedule in 2025, with matchups against Tennessee, Clemson, SMU, Miami, and Notre Dame. Brown has leveraged the transfer portal aggressively, securing the 11th-ranked transfer class nationally, but with LSU transfer Rickie Collins taking over at quarterback with limited collegiate experience, expectations should be managed realistically.
O’Brien exceeded expectations in his first season at BC, compiling a 7-6 record, including a stunning upset over #10 Florida State. While most analysts focus on the Florida State upset and his NFL/Alabama pedigree, they miss the deeper story: BC built their success on a foundation of dominant rushing (166.1 yards per game) and a defense that created chaos (17 interceptions, 31 sacks). Despite significant transfer portal losses—including QB Thomas Castellanos to Florida State and RB Kye Robichaux to graduation—O’Brien has strategically addressed needs by adding Alabama transfer QB Dylan Lonergan and several key defensive pieces. The combination of contractual stability (including a unique clause preventing NFL departures) and early success gives O’Brien something rare in college football: time to build his program the right way.
The most significant development in Clemson’s program isn’t winning the ACC Championship in 2024 or making another College Football Playoff appearance—it’s Dabo Swinney finally deciding to evolve. After years of resisting modern trends, Swinney has embraced the transfer portal, adding perfect pieces like Will Heldt (Purdue edge rusher), Jeremiah Alexander (Alabama LB), and Tristan Smith (Southeast Missouri State WR) to complement an already loaded roster. Critically, Swinney isn’t abandoning his principles but enhancing them, as evidenced by a strong 2025 recruiting class featuring 5-star DL Amare Adams and 4-star RB Gideon Davidson. With defensive coordinator Tom Allen implementing his aggressive system and QB Cade Klubnik entering his third year in offensive coordinator Garrett Riley’s system, Clemson has combined everything that made them great (championship culture, elite development) with everything they needed (modern roster building, innovative schemes).
After back-to-back 9+ win seasons, Brohm has established Louisville as a program on the rise. The Cardinals lost significant talent—including QB Tyler Shough, WR Ja’Corey Brooks, and defensive standouts—but Brohm has weaponized the transfer portal, adding 21 players (ranking 21st nationally and 4th in the ACC). The crown jewel is USC transfer QB Miller Moss, who torched Louisville for 372 yards and six touchdowns in the 2023 Holiday Bowl. With explosive RBs Isaac Brown and Duke Watson returning, eight home games, and a favorable schedule, Brohm has positioned Louisville for another breakthrough season. ESPN’s SP+ ranks Louisville 22nd nationally, and Bill Connelly projects them as a potential 4th seed in the expanded playoff. The only question is whether the new pieces can gel quickly enough to capitalize on this golden opportunity.
After shocking the college football world with an 11-3 record and perfect 8-0 conference run in their ACC debut, Lashlee has rapidly cooled his seat. The Mustangs aren’t just happy to be in the ACC—they’re legitimate contenders. Quarterback Kevin Jennings returns after a stellar season (3,245 passing yards, 23 TDs), and SMU has strategically used the transfer portal to add perfect pieces like Zion Nelson (OT), Anthony Evans (WR), and Terry Webb (DL). While detractors point to losses against Power Four competition, they ignore how close those games were and how much talent SMU brings back. If Lashlee can improve defensive consistency against elite competition, make better in-game adjustments, and replace lost offensive production, SMU has legitimate national championship upside in just their second ACC season.
After a surprising 9-4 record (5-3 in conference play) in 2024, Diaz has quickly established himself as one of the ACC’s brightest coaching stars. Duke made the biggest quarterback splash in program history this offseason by securing former Tulane star Darian Mensah, who commanded a reported $8 million deal over two years. The defense, Diaz’s specialty, returns several key playmakers including All-American cornerback Chandler Rivers and All-American safety Terry Moore. The Blue Devils’ 2025 recruiting class ranks #33-35 nationally, the highest-rated class in program history. The brutal 2025 schedule—featuring nine bowl teams from 2024 and road trips to Clemson, SMU, Miami, and Notre Dame—will test whether Diaz can build sustainable success or if 2024 was simply a one-year wonder.
After four consecutive 3-9 seasons under Dave Clawson, Wake Forest’s complete coaching overhaul under Dickert signals a program ready for transformation. Dickert doesn’t just bring a 23-20 record from Washington State—he brings experience navigating extreme adversity, having managed through financial crisis, the Pac-12 collapse, and significant roster exodus. He’s completely rebuilt Wake’s coaching staff, adding offensive coordinator Rob Ezell (whose South Alabama offense averaged 34.4 points per game), defensive coordinator Scottie Hazelton, and creating a 10-member recruiting infrastructure that simply didn’t exist before. While early ACC power rankings place Wake Forest 16th heading into 2025 with statistical projections suggesting a modest improvement to 5-7, Dickert’s comprehensive approach emphasizes building a foundation rather than seeking quick wins. For a program that looked increasingly directionless in 2024, Dickert’s arrival represents something invaluable: a coherent vision for the future.
The college football world collectively gasped when the legendary NFL coach announced he was taking his talents to Chapel Hill after 24 seasons, 6 Super Bowl rings, and more than 300 victories with the New England Patriots. After a disappointing 6-7 season in 2024 that ended Mack Brown’s second tenure, UNC made the most shocking hire in recent memory. Belichick’s impact was immediately visible—players took the field wearing jerseys without names or numbers, the most visible sign of the “team-first” philosophy that defined his New England dynasty. While the university has committed to a nearly 25% increase in football spending, Belichick faces unique challenges in his college coaching debut: NCAA rules restricting player contact, mastering recruiting and NIL landscapes, and adapting his demanding style for younger athletes. With quarterback uncertainty (Purdue transfer Ryan Browne and freshman Bryce Baker lead a thin depth chart) and a roster in transition, 2025 will be about building a foundation rather than making an immediate championship push.
The college football world collectively gasped when legendary NFL coach Bill Belichick announced he was taking his talents to Chapel Hill.
After 24 seasons, 6 Super Bowl rings, and more than 300 victories with the New England Patriots, the most accomplished coach in NFL history is attempting something entirely new at age 72—rebuilding a college program that finished a disappointing 6-7 in 2024.
This unprecedented coaching hire raises fascinating questions:
Can the NFL’s most successful tactician adapt to the college game?
Will Belichick’s notoriously demanding style connect with a younger generation of players?
Is UNC positioned to become the ACC’s next powerhouse program?
How quickly can Belichick implement his championship culture at North Carolina?
Let’s discuss this seismic coaching change for the Tar Heels’ 2025 season and beyond.
The 2024 Season Proved UNC Football Needed a Complete Reset
A frustrating pattern of inconsistency defined North Carolina’s 2024 campaign.
Despite flashes of offensive brilliance (30.92 points per game), the Tar Heels’ defensive shortcomings (28.08 points allowed) prevented the team from gaining meaningful momentum throughout the season. The ground game flourished with 2,727 rushing yards, but an inconsistent passing attack and porous pass defense ultimately doomed UNC to a sub—.500 record.
The season-ending 35-30 loss to NC State perfectly encapsulated the team’s struggles:
Explosive plays (like Omarion Hampton’s 75-yard touchdown run)
Crippling defensive breakdowns
Momentum-killing penalties
An inability to close out winnable games
This disappointing season marked the end of Mack Brown’s second tenure in Chapel Hill, creating the opening for college football’s most shocking coaching hire in recent memory.
The Belichick Effect Has Already Transformed UNC’s Culture
“I don’t really have any expectations,” Belichick stated about his first season at North Carolina, emphasizing that success will depend on individual player buy-in and effort.
But don’t mistake Belichick’s measured public stance for a lack of internal ambition. The changes under his leadership were immediately visible during spring practice. Players took the field wearing jerseys without names or numbers—the most visible sign of the “team-first” philosophy that defined his New England dynasty.
The university has doubled down on this cultural revolution by:
Committing to a nearly 25% increase in football spending
Supporting an aggressive talent acquisition strategy through recruiting and transfers
Providing Belichick the autonomy to rebuild the program in his image
Allowing him to implement his physical, fundamentals-based practice approach
“Everybody that buys into it and wants to be a part of it, will be a part of it,” Belichick emphasized when discussing his approach to building the program.
The players have responded enthusiastically to this cultural shift. “The players have responded well. They seem generally excited and enthused to be playing football,” Belichick noted in early comments about his transition to the collegiate ranks.
Talent Acquisition Has Become a Top Priority
Building a championship-caliber roster requires elite talent.
The Tar Heels have signed 19 new players, including 17 freshmen and two transfers: offensive lineman Daniel King from Troy and kicker Jaffer Murphy from Lake Erie. This recruiting class ranks No. 32 nationally (No. 43 excluding transfers), providing a solid foundation for the program’s future.
However, several roster questions remain heading into the 2025 season:
Quarterback uncertainty (Purdue transfer Ryan Browne and freshman Bryce Baker lead a thin depth chart)
Defensive improvement needs at multiple positions
Offensive line development under Belichick’s physical approach
Special teams capabilities, a longtime Belichick emphasis
The coaching staff’s ability to develop this talent while continuing to recruit high-level players will determine UNC’s trajectory in the coming years.
Belichick Faces Unique Challenges in His College Coaching Debut
The transition from NFL icon to college coach presents Belichick with unfamiliar obstacles.
NCAA rules restrict coaches to just eight hours per week of player meetings, a fraction of what Belichick had at his disposal in New England. This limitation could hinder his ability to implement the complex schemes and detailed preparation that defined his NFL success.
Other significant challenges include:
Mastering the recruiting trail and NIL landscape
Adapting his notoriously demanding coaching style for younger athletes
Managing roster volatility in the transfer portal era
Balancing his tactical preferences with available personnel
Connecting with a new generation of players
“The response has been great,” Belichick remarked about his connection with younger players, suggesting that initial concerns about a generational disconnect may be overblown.
What Should Tar Heel Fans Reasonably Expect in 2025?
Former NFL player Jason McCourty made headlines with his bold prediction that Belichick could lead UNC to the College Football Playoff in his first year.
While such immediate success would be remarkable, most reasonable observers view 2025 as a foundation-building season rather than an immediate championship push. Success in year one might be measured by:
Competitive play against ACC opponents
Significant defensive improvement
Development of young talent, particularly at quarterback
Establishing a sustainable recruiting pipeline
Enhanced physical play, especially in the trenches
Belichick plans to use spring practice to develop players through contact and physicality, particularly in the run game and along the line of scrimmage—a philosophy that aligns with his long-established belief that championship teams are built from the inside out.
The marriage between one of football’s greatest tactical minds and a program hungry for national relevance will be one of college football’s most fascinating storylines in 2025.
For a university often defined by basketball excellence, Belichick’s arrival signals that North Carolina is deadly serious about competing at the highest level on the gridiron.
THE FINAL COUNTDOWN: ACC DEEP DIVE FINALE + EXCLUSIVE HOT SEAT RANKINGS COMING TUESDAY
Here’s the brutal truth most college football writers won’t tell you:
By the time their “analysis” hits your inbox, the smart money has already moved.
We’re wrapping up our intense, no-holds-barred examination of the ACC—program by program, coach by coach, recruit by recruit. And guess what? Our exclusive ACC Hot Seat Rankings aren’t following the typical publishing schedule.
They’re coming early.
Next Tuesday.
Only for subscribers.
While other outlets are still collecting their thoughts, our subscribers will already know:
Which ACC coach is one bad season away from cleaning out his office
The up-and-coming coordinator quietly fielding calls from three different programs
Why one “stable” program is actually sitting on a powder keg of internal drama
BECOME AN INSIDER
The college football landscape changes in heartbeats, not seasons.
Our team-by-team analysis doesn’t just tell you what happened—it reveals what’s HAPPENING. Right now. Behind closed doors. In text messages between ADs and agents that never make ESPN.
Subscribe for free now to unlock:
Comprehensive breakdowns of each FBS program’s trajectory
Exclusive hot seat rankings based on sources inside athletic departments
In-depth conference analysis delivered straight to your inbox
You’re joining thousands of college football insiders who leverage our intelligence to stay ahead of the conversation.
The difference between being informed and being influential?
Wake Forest football needed a complete coaching overhaul after limping to a disappointing 4-8 record in 2024.
The Demon Deacons are hitting the reset button with new head coach Jake Dickert, who arrives in Winston-Salem after compiling a 23-20 record at Washington State. The former Cougars coach brings a proven track record of bowl appearances (three in four years) and a reputation for developing NFL talent. More importantly, he brings a desperately needed fresh perspective to a program that had clearly plateaued.
Here’s what Wake Forest fans need to know about the complete transformation underway:
The coaching staff has been rebuilt from the ground up
Dickert didn’t just bring a few familiar faces – he’s orchestrated a complete overhaul of the Demon Deacons’ coaching structure.
Rob Ezell (Offensive Coordinator): His South Alabama offense averaged a blistering 34.4 points per game in 2024
Scottie Hazelton (Defensive Coordinator): Brings 29 years of experience with stops at Michigan State and Texas
Effrem Reed (Running Backs): Known for developing productive rushing attacks at South Alabama
Nick Edwards (Wide Receivers): Former Washington State coach with NFL experience
Jared Kaster (Offensive Line): Another WSU connection specializing in trench development
Nick Whitworth (Special Teams): Brings consistency to an often overlooked phase of the game
Beyond on-field coaches, Dickert has built an infrastructure designed for long-term success. The program now boasts a 10-member recruiting team led by GM Rob Schlaeger and Assistant GM Russ Kieselhorst – positions that didn’t exist in the previous regime.
This isn’t just a coaching change. It’s a complete program reimagining.
Dickert survived college football chaos at Washington State
What makes Dickert uniquely qualified for this rebuilding job isn’t just his 23-20 record – it’s the circumstances under which he achieved it.
Seemingly insurmountable challenges defined his tenure at Washington State:
Financial crisis: The athletic department faced an $11 million budget reduction
Pac-12 collapse: Found his program suddenly conference-less as the Pac-12 imploded
NIL disadvantages: Lost star quarterback Cam Ward to Miami’s seven-figure NIL deal
Roster exodus: Saw 20 players enter the transfer portal in 2024 alone
Staff turnover: Constantly rebuilt his coaching staff as assistants departed
Yet, Dickert managed three bowl appearances and multiple wins over ranked opponents.
“We’re going to start from the start,” Dickert stated in his introductory press conference, signaling his methodical approach to program rebuilding.
The strategic overhaul should be immediate and noticeable
Wake Forest’s on-field product will look dramatically different in 2025.
The 2024 Demon Deacons were mediocre on offense (25.67 points per game) and downright awful on defense (32.50 points allowed). Both units lacked a clear identity – a problem Dickert’s staff is designed to solve.
Under offensive coordinator Rob Ezell, expect:
A balanced but explosive attack (his South Alabama offense averaged 34.4 PPG)
Creative utilization of running back Demond Claiborne
A quarterback competition that will define spring practice
Defensively, Scottie Hazelton brings an aggressive, turnover-focused approach that should immediately energize a unit that looked lost in 2024. Having defensive end Jasheen Davis (career: 25.5 sacks, 52 TFLs) and safety Nick Andersen (122 tackles in 2024) gives Hazelton proven playmakers to build around.
The scheme changes alone should make Wake Forest more competitive in 2025.
Realistic expectations? Think long-term investment, not immediate dividends.
Let’s be honest: Wake Forest isn’t going to transform into a 10-win team overnight magically.
Early ACC power rankings have the Demon Deacons sitting at 16th heading into 2025, and statistical projections suggest a modest improvement to around 5-7. The mathematical probability of bowl eligibility stands at approximately 41%.
But the real story of 2025 won’t be found in the win-loss column.
It will be about establishing a foundation, implementing systems, and beginning the cultural transformation that Dickert envisions. His comprehensive approach – expanding the recruiting infrastructure, prioritizing player development, and implementing sustainable processes – reflects a coach building for long-term success rather than quick wins.
“There’s a certain type of player who belongs at Wake Forest,” Dickert noted, emphasizing his understanding that Wake’s unique position as a high-academic ACC institution requires a specific recruiting approach.
This isn’t a one-year fix. It’s year one of a complete program rebuild.
The verdict: Wake Forest finally has a clear direction
For a program that looked increasingly directionless in 2024, Dickert’s arrival represents something invaluable: a coherent vision for the future.
The coaching staff has proven success at various levels of college football, and the expanded infrastructure demonstrates institutional commitment. Dickert’s experience navigating extreme adversity at Washington State has prepared him for the challenge of elevating Wake Forest in the increasingly competitive ACC landscape.
Although the 2025 season may not produce a dramatic turnaround in the standings, it will give Wake Forest something it desperately needs: a foundation for sustainable success and a clear identity moving forward.
That alone makes it a season worth watching.
THE FINAL COUNTDOWN: ACC DEEP DIVE FINALE + EXCLUSIVE HOT SEAT RANKINGS COMING TUESDAY
Here’s the brutal truth most college football writers won’t tell you:
By the time their “analysis” hits your inbox, the smart money has already moved.
We’re wrapping up our intense, no-holds-barred examination of the ACC—program by program, coach by coach, recruit by recruit. And guess what? Our exclusive ACC Hot Seat Rankings aren’t following the typical publishing schedule.
They’re coming early.
Next Tuesday.
Only for subscribers.
While other outlets are still collecting their thoughts, our subscribers will already know:
Which ACC coach is one subpar season away from cleaning out his office?
Which program will be the surprise of the 2025 season?
Why one “stable” program is sitting on a powder keg of internal drama?
BECOME AN INSIDER
The college football landscape changes in heartbeats, not seasons.
Our team-by-team analysis doesn’t just tell you what happened—it reveals what’s HAPPENING. Right now. Behind closed doors. In text messages between ADs and agents that never make ESPN.
Subscribe for free now to unlock:
Comprehensive breakdowns of each FBS program’s trajectory
Exclusive hot seat rankings based on sources inside athletic departments
In-depth conference analysis delivered straight to your inbox
You’re joining thousands of college football insiders who leverage our intelligence to stay ahead of the conversation.
The difference between being informed and being influential?
Tony Elliott’s career at Virginia hangs by a thread.
After three disappointing seasons, UVA’s embattled head coach enters 2025 with the hottest seat in the ACC and a fanbase running dangerously low on patience. His 11-23 record (.324 winning percentage) has made Virginia the conference’s most consistent underachiever, but a combination of promising transfers and a favorable schedule offers one final opportunity for redemption.
Is there hope for a turnaround, or are we witnessing the final chapter of Elliott’s Virginia story?
The Numbers Don’t Lie: Elliott’s Coaching Crisis
The survival threshold for Elliott sits at eight wins.
With a meager .324 winning percentage that falls well below Coaches Hot Seat’s “Minimum Acceptable” standard of .419, calculated for UVA, Elliott has exhausted nearly all goodwill in Charlottesville. The statistics paint a brutal picture of his tenure:
11-23 overall record spanning three seasons without a bowl appearance
4-8 mark in one-score games, revealing a troubling pattern in clutch moments
Zero winning seasons since taking over in 2022
$15 million NIL payroll for 2025 that demands immediate returns
$4 million buyout that continues to decrease annually
The situation becomes even more precarious considering Athletic Director Carla Williams’ contract expires in June 2025, potentially setting the stage for a complete program reset should results fail to improve dramatically.
Why Has Elliott Failed Where Others Succeeded?
Poor offensive execution has derailed Elliott’s Virginia tenure from the start.
Despite arriving with a championship pedigree as Clemson’s offensive coordinator, Elliott’s pro-style system under coordinator Des Kitchings has consistently underperformed. The 2024 season showcased several critical flaws that have defined the Elliott era:
Personnel mismanagement epitomized by Anthony Colandrea’s benching and subsequent transfer to UMass
Defensive vulnerabilities that surrendered 263.1 passing yards and 145.3 rushing yards per game
The most damning statistic? Elliott’s Cavaliers have gone just 4-8 in one-score games, revealing a program that consistently falters in critical moments.
The Transfer Portal Lifeline: Virginia’s 2025 Reinforcements
Virginia’s 25th-ranked transfer class might save Elliott’s job.
After watching 21 players exit the program, including starting quarterback Anthony Colandrea, Elliott orchestrated an aggressive transfer portal strategy that brought 17 new players to Charlottesville. The influx addresses nearly every position group with experienced talent:
Chandler Morris (QB, TCU): A proven Power 5 starter with 5,500+ career passing yards, 42 touchdowns, and a 67.4% completion percentage
Mitchell Melton (DL, Ohio State): Brings 4.5 sacks of production from one of college football’s elite programs
Fisher Camac (DT, UNLV): Coming off an impressive 11.5 tackles for loss season
This massive roster overhaul specifically targets Virginia’s most glaring weaknesses from 2024: quarterback inconsistency, pass rush deficiencies, and defensive vulnerability.
A Schedule Built for Success
The 2025 schedule gives Elliott his clearest path to salvation.
Unlike previous seasons where challenging matchups doomed Virginia to early failure, the 2025 slate provides legitimate opportunities for Elliott to build momentum and confidence:
Seven home games including winnable contests against Stanford, Wake Forest, and Virginia Tech
Notable ACC absences as schedule rotation spares UVA from facing powerhouses Clemson and Miami
Strategic bye weeks that provide recovery opportunities before critical conference games
Potential fast start with manageable non-conference opponents in Coastal Carolina and William & Mary
If Elliott can’t capitalize on this favorable draw, no excuses will be left to justify his continuation as head coach.
SWOT Analysis: Virginia’s 2025 Season Outlook
Strengths That Could Save Elliott
The Cavaliers aren’t without weapons heading into 2025.
Significantly upgraded quarterback play with Morris
Revamped defensive front seven through transfer portal
Special teams reliability (Will Bettridge 18/21 FGs in 2024)
Experienced defensive playmakers (LB Kam Robinson: 64 tackles, 5 sacks; S Jonas Sanker: 98 tackles)
Weaknesses That Could Derail The Season
Persistent issues continue to threaten Virginia’s progress.
Secondary depth remains questionable against pass-heavy ACC opponents
Offensive line rebuilding after losing three starters
Running back depth concerns following Kobe Pace’s transfer
Consistent penalty and turnover issues suggesting deeper discipline problems
Opportunities For Immediate Improvement
Several factors could accelerate Virginia’s revival.
Schedule alignment provides winnable games to build momentum
Transfer additions address most pressing roster needs
Fourth year in Elliott’s system offers continuity advantages
Defensive improvements could take pressure off developing offense
Threats To Watch For
External factors could complicate Elliott’s redemption story.
Growing fan discontent affecting home field advantage
Competitive ACC landscape offering limited margin for error
Administrative uncertainty with AD’s contract situation
The Final Verdict: Can Elliott Survive?
Tony Elliott has one last chance to prove he belongs.
After three years of disappointment, excuses have run dry in Charlottesville. The roster reconstruction offers legitimate reasons for optimism, but Elliott’s history of underperformance casts a long shadow over the program’s future.
The magic number appears to be eight—as in eight regular season wins. Anything less likely signals the end of Elliott’s Virginia tenure, especially if administrative changes occur at the athletic director position.
For long-suffering Virginia fans, the 2025 season represents not just another campaign but a crucial inflection point for a program desperately seeking relevance in an increasingly competitive ACC landscape.
Will Elliott finally translate potential into performance, or is this simply the calm before another coaching change in Charlottesville?
The clock is ticking.
THE FINAL COUNTDOWN: ACC DEEP DIVE FINALE + EXCLUSIVE HOT SEAT RANKINGS COMING TUESDAY
Here’s the brutal truth most college football writers won’t tell you:
By the time their “analysis” hits your inbox, the smart money has already moved.
We’re wrapping up our intense, no-holds-barred examination of the ACC—program by program, coach by coach, recruit by recruit. And guess what? Our exclusive ACC Hot Seat Rankings aren’t following the typical publishing schedule.
They’re coming early.
Next Tuesday.
Only for subscribers.
While other outlets are still collecting their thoughts, our subscribers will already know:
Which ACC coach is one bad season away from cleaning out his office
The up-and-coming coordinator quietly fielding calls from three different programs
Why one “stable” program is actually sitting on a powder keg of internal drama
BECOME AN INSIDER
The college football landscape changes in heartbeats, not seasons.
Our team-by-team analysis doesn’t just tell you what happened—it reveals what’s HAPPENING. Right now. Behind closed doors. In text messages between ADs and agents that never make ESPN.
Subscribe for free now to unlock:
Comprehensive breakdowns of each FBS program’s trajectory
Exclusive hot seat rankings based on sources inside athletic departments
In-depth conference analysis delivered straight to your inbox
You’re joining thousands of college football insiders who leverage our intelligence to stay ahead of the conversation.
The difference between being informed and being influential?
After experiencing one of their most successful seasons in recent memory, the Orange program now faces the daunting task of building on their 2024 breakthrough while navigating substantial roster turnover and what many analysts consider the toughest schedule in the ACC.
Let’s break down what lies ahead for Syracuse in 2025:
The 2024 Renaissance Set a New Standard
The Orange revival under first-year head coach Fran Brown transformed the program’s trajectory overnight.
Here’s what made 2024 memorable:
A remarkable 10-3 record (5-3 in ACC play), securing their first 10-win season since 2018 and only their third since 2000
A dominant 52-35 victory over Washington State in the Holiday Bowl
Victories over three AP-ranked teams (Miami, UNLV, and Georgia Tech) for the first time since 1998
A high-powered offense averaging 467.6 yards and 34.08 points per game
The 2024 success created legitimate excitement within a fan base that had weathered numerous lean years, but now comes the hard part: proving it wasn’t just a one-year wonder.
The Transfer Portal Giveth and Taketh Away
The roster reconstruction heading into 2025 presents Syracuse’s biggest challenge.
Syracuse has lost several cornerstone players from last year’s breakthrough squad:
The quarterback position represents the most significant question mark, with LSU transfer Rickie Collins expected to take the reins despite limited collegiate experience. The redshirt freshman has impressive physical tools but faces the monumental task of replacing McCord’s production in a high-pressure environment.
In the backfield, sophomore Yasin Willis (36 carries, 130 yards in 2024) must fill the considerable void left by Allen’s departure. The receiving corps needs sophomores Zeed Haynes and Emanuel Ross to step into expanded roles after losing Trebor Pena and Jackson Meeks, who combined for 162 receptions and 1,962 yards last season.
Brown has leveraged the transfer portal aggressively, securing the 11th-ranked transfer class nationally to address these gaps, but player development and chemistry remain significant unknowns heading into the season.
The 2025 Schedule Looks Like a Gauntlet Designed by a Sadist
If roster challenges weren’t daunting enough, Syracuse might face college football’s most demanding schedule in 2025.
Consider what lies ahead:
Opening against 2024 College Football Playoff participant Tennessee in Atlanta
Road trips to Clemson, SMU, Miami, and Notre Dame—all programs expected to be ranked in the top 15
Four total games against 2024 College Football Playoff teams
Limited opportunities for “breather” games against lower-tier competition
Syracuse will need to maximize its home-field advantage at the JMA Wireless Dome, where it posted a 6-1 record last season. Winning all its home games would put it on the cusp of bowl eligibility, but stealing victories on the road against elite competition will be necessary to approach last year’s success.
With this schedule, the path to bowl eligibility becomes exceedingly narrow, making every winnable game absolutely critical.
SWOT Analysis: Breaking Down Syracuse’s 2025 Outlook
Strengths
The program’s foundation remains solid despite personnel changes.
Coaching Continuity: Brown’s impressive first-year success demonstrated both tactical acumen and recruiting prowess, and he’s retained key coordinators Jeff Nixon and Elijah Robinson
Momentum: The Orange closed 2024 on a four-game winning streak, establishing a winning culture that has carried through the offseason
Passing Game Framework: Despite McCord’s departure, Syracuse’s offensive system is designed to generate passing yards in bunches
Weaknesses
Several statistical vulnerabilities could become more pronounced in 2025.
Rushing Inefficiency: Even with Allen in 2024, Syracuse averaged just 3.2 yards per carry and 97.6 rushing yards per game
Pass Defense Vulnerability: The Orange allowed 227.3 passing yards per game with opponents completing nearly 66% of their attempts
Discipline Issues: Syracuse averaged 7.1 penalties for 59.2 yards per game, often stalling drives or providing opponents advantageous field position
X-Factors for Success
Three elements will determine whether Syracuse can defy expectations in 2025:
Collins’ Development Curve: The speed at which Collins acclimates to the starting role will largely determine Syracuse’s offensive ceiling
Ground Game Emergence: Syracuse desperately needs improved rushing production to achieve offensive balance and take pressure off an inexperienced quarterback
Defensive Playmaking: The Orange defense recorded 11 interceptions last season but needs to generate more turnovers to create short fields and scoring opportunities
Expecting Syracuse to match last year’s 10-win total would defy logic.
Given the combination of significant roster turnover and a brutal schedule, analysts generally project a regular-season record between 7-5 and 8-4, representing a successful transition year considering the circumstances.
The first month will be particularly telling. If Syracuse can emerge from September with at least a 2-2 record, they’ll position themselves for another bowl appearance. However, a 1-3 or 0-4 start could create a challenging hole to climb out.
For Syracuse fans, the 2025 season represents a critical barometer: Was 2024’s success a fleeting moment tied to a specific roster, or the beginning of a sustainable program resurrection under Brown’s leadership?
The answer lies somewhere in the brutal gauntlet of games ahead.
THE FINAL COUNTDOWN: ACC DEEP DIVE FINALE + EXCLUSIVE HOT SEAT RANKINGS COMING TUESDAY
Here’s the brutal truth most college football writers won’t tell you:
By the time their “analysis” hits your inbox, the smart money has already moved.
We’re wrapping up our intense, no-holds-barred examination of the ACC—program by program, coach by coach, recruit by recruit. And guess what? Our exclusive ACC Hot Seat Rankings aren’t following the typical publishing schedule.
They’re coming early.
Next Tuesday.
Only for subscribers.
While other outlets are still collecting their thoughts, our subscribers will already know:
Which ACC coach is one bad season away from cleaning out his office
The up-and-coming coordinator quietly fielding calls from three different programs
Why one “stable” program is actually sitting on a powder keg of internal drama
BECOME AN INSIDER
The college football landscape changes in heartbeats, not seasons.
Our team-by-team analysis doesn’t just tell you what happened—it reveals what’s HAPPENING. Right now. Behind closed doors. In text messages between ADs and agents that never make ESPN.
Subscribe for free now to unlock:
Comprehensive breakdowns of each FBS program’s trajectory
Exclusive hot seat rankings based on sources inside athletic departments
In-depth conference analysis delivered straight to your inbox
You’re joining thousands of college football insiders who leverage our intelligence to stay ahead of the conversation.
The difference between being informed and being influential?
The Mustangs aren’t just joining the conversation—they’re about to dominate it.
After surprising the college football world with an 11-3 record and perfect 8-0 conference run in their ACC debut, Southern Methodist University is loaded and ready to prove 2024 was no fluke. The question isn’t whether SMU belongs—it’s whether the rest of the ACC is ready for what’s coming next.
Kevin Jennings Is The Best Quarterback Nobody’s Talking About
One sentence: that’s all it takes to understand SMU’s offensive ceiling in 2025.
The Mustangs’ attack revolves around quarterbackKevin Jennings, who silently assembled one of the most impressive statistical seasons in the conference last year:
3,245 passing yards (among ACC leaders)
23 touchdowns against just 12 interceptions
Command of an offense that averaged 429.5 yards per game
Dual-threat ability that kept defensive coordinators sleepless
Jennings showed remarkable growth throughout last season, displaying impressive command of the offense and making plays inside and outside the pocket that give SMU a foundation to build around.
What makes SMU’s quarterback situation even more enviable is the addition of transfer Tyler Van Dyke, providing elite-level insurance if Jennings misses any time.
The Transfer Portal Has Been SMU’s Secret Weapon
The Mustangs didn’t just dip their toes in the transfer waters—they dove in headfirst and emerged with game-changers.
While other programs scramble to patch roster holes, SMU strategically targeted and secured players who fit specific needs:
Zion Nelson (OT): An instant starter who will anchor the offensive line
Rocket Rahimi (S): The former San Jose State standout adds physicality to the secondary
Terry Webb (DL): Fills the gap left by Elijah Roberts with immediate pass-rush potential
MarcellusBarnes (CB): Provides depth and versatility to an already talented secondary
What’s most impressive about SMU’s portal strategy is their focus on quality over quantity. The coaching staff has identified specific needs and targeted experienced players who fit their culture and systems.
The portal additions don’t just fill gaps—they potentially upgrade positions of strength.
The 2024 Season Wasn’t A Fluke. It Was A Warning.
SMU’s success last season wasn’t luck or scheduling magic.
The numbers tell the story of a legitimately balanced team:
Perfect 8-0 in regular season ACC play
429.5 yards per game of total offense (261.9 passing, 167.6 rushing)
Held opponents to 326 yards per game
Reached the College Football Playoff in Year One
Lost a nail-biter to Clemson in the ACC Championship
The most frightening part for ACC opponents? This team is still ascending.
While detractors point to losses against Power Four competition, they conveniently ignore how close those games were and how much returning talent SMU brings back for 2025.
“What this team accomplished in their first ACC season can’t be overstated. Going undefeated in conference play and reaching the playoff showed that SMU belongs at this level of competition.” — College Football Analyst.
The honeymoon is over—it’s time for SMU to take the next step.
Three Areas Where SMU Must Improve To Win The ACC
No team is perfect, and SMU’s coaching staff knows exactly where improvement is needed.
Defensive consistency against elite competition: The Mustangs defense showed flashes of brilliance in 2024 but faltered in crucial moments against Clemson and Penn State. The addition of Terry Webb and a revamped defensive line aims to generate more consistent pressure without excessive blitzing.
In-game adjustments against top-tier opponents: The coaching staff struggled to counter-punch effectively when the initial game plan encountered resistance in the biggest games. Year Two in the conference should bring better situational awareness and tactical flexibility.
Replacing lost offensive production: With the departure of top rusher Brashard Smith and several key receivers, new playmakers must emerge. LJ Johnson Jr. and transfer Christopher Johnson will lead the backfield, while Jordan Hudson looks to become the primary receiving threat.
If these three areas see improvement, SMU will have a legitimate national championship upside.
The 2025 Schedule: Where The Games Will Be Won And Lost
Not all conference schedules are created equal, and SMU’s 2025 slate offers landmines and opportunities.
The critical matchups that will define the season:
at Clemson: The ultimate measuring stick against the conference standard-bearer
vs. Miami: A home showdown that could determine ACC Championship positioning
vs. Louisville: Another home test against a program on a similar trajectory
at Baylor (Non-Conference): An opportunity to make a statement against a regional Power Four opponent
Industry projections set SMU’s win total around 9.5 for the season, making them an enticing “over” bet for those who believe the program’s momentum will continue.
The most favorable aspect? SMU avoids Florida State and North Carolina, potentially easing their path through conference play.
Rhett Lashlee Is Building A Sustainable Powerhouse On The Hilltop
Culture doesn’t happen by accident.
Head coach Rhett Lashlee enters his fourth season at SMU with growing national recognition for both his offensive genius and program-building abilities. His offensive system produced a perfectly balanced attack in 2024 (261.9 passing yards and 167.6 rushing yards per game) while remaining adaptable to his personnel.
One of Lashlee’s greatest strengths is maximizing what his players do best. His offensive system presents complex problems for opponents while remaining clear and executable for the players within it.
What’s next for the coaching staff is proving they can:
Out-scheme the ACC’s elite coaches
Make faster in-game adjustments
Develop the next wave of playmakers
Convert recruiting momentum into on-field results
The foundation has been laid—now it’s about building a sustainable program that competes for championships annually.
The Bottom Line: SMU Is No Longer Just Happy To Be Here
The days of SMU being considered a novelty in the ACC are officially over.
The Mustangs transformed from curious conference newcomers to legitimate title contenders in just one season. With Jennings returning at quarterback, strategic transfer additions, and a year of invaluable experience, SMU enters 2025 with the talent and confidence to compete with anyone.
What’s happening at SMU isn’t just a one-year wonder. The infrastructure, talent, and coaching are clearly in place for sustained success at this level. The question isn’t whether they belong—it’s how high they can climb.
For a program with SMU’s rich history now writing exciting new chapters, the 2025 season represents an opportunity to prove that their ACC debut was just the beginning.
The Mustangs aren’t building for the future—their time is now.
After a mediocre 6-6 campaign in 2024 culminating in a Duke’s Mayo Bowl appearance against Minnesota, the Hokies enter 2025 with their entire program trajectory hanging in the balance. Head coach Brent Pry finds himself squarely on the hot seat with a 16-21 record over three seasons, while significant roster turnover and a revamped coaching staff add further layers of uncertainty.
The question on everyone’s mind isn’t just whether Virginia Tech can improve—it’s whether this proud program can reclaim its position among college football’s relevant powers.
The 2024 Season: Opportunities Squandered
Virginia Tech’s 2024 season was defined by moments they’d rather forget.
The Hokies stumbled out of the gate with a painful 34-27 loss at Vanderbilt and later dropped another winnable non-conference game against Rutgers 26-23. One-score games became their nemesis, with the team losing five such contests including a particularly controversial defeat at Miami that left the fan base fuming.
Despite the disappointment, several individual performances stood out:
Running back Bhayshul Tuten emerged as the offensive centerpiece, rushing for an impressive 1,159 yards and scoring 15 touchdowns while averaging a robust 4.7 yards per carry.
Kicker John Love demonstrated remarkable accuracy by converting 16 of 18 field goal attempts and maintaining perfection on extra points.
Quarterback Kyron Drones showed flashes of brilliance, completing 136 of 224 passes for 1,562 yards and 10 touchdowns.
These individual bright spots couldn’t mask a team that averaged 189.4 passing yards per game and struggled with defensive consistency, allowing 215.9 passing yards per contest.
The Coaching Overhaul: Pry’s Last Stand?
Brent Pry has pushed his chips to the center of the table.
Following the underwhelming 2024 campaign, Pry made decisive and necessary changes to his coaching staff. Gone are defensive coordinator Chris Marve, offensive line coach Ron Crook, and senior director of strength and conditioning Dwight Galt IV—all casualties of a season that failed to meet expectations.
Their replacements represent Pry’s final attempt at building a staff capable of saving his job:
Philip Montgomery arrives as offensive coordinator, bringing a track record of explosive offenses from his time at Baylor and Tulsa.
Sam Siefkes takes over defensive coordinator duties, implementing new tactical approaches to shore up a unit that allowed 215.9 passing yards per game in 2024.
Both coordinators must deliver immediate results to silence prominent analysts like ESPN’s Adam Rittenberg and The Athletic’s Andy Staples, who have explicitly identified Pry as a coach whose job security hangs by a thread.
With the countdown officially underway, Pry’s fate will depend on whether these new voices can translate to on-field success.
The Transfer Portal: A Two-Way Street
The transfer portal era has fundamentally reshaped college football roster management, and Virginia Tech felt its full impact.
With over 30 new players entering the program while numerous contributors from 2024 sought opportunities elsewhere, the Hokies are essentially fielding a new team. The exodus of talent created significant voids:
The offensive backfield loses Bhayshul Tuten, whose production (1,159 yards, 15 touchdowns) served as the engine of an offense that averaged 178.4 yards per game on the ground.
The defensive front must replace stalwarts like Antwaun Powell-Ryland (16 sacks) and Aeneas Peebles (All-American Third Team).
Additional departures include cornerback Jalen Stroman, linebacker Keli Lawson, and offensive lineman Xavier Chaplin (Auburn), creating depth concerns across multiple position groups.
To counter these losses, the Hokies aggressively pursued transfer talent:
Cameron Seldon (Tennessee) arrives as a versatile weapon capable of contributing at both running back and receiver.
Running back reinforcements include Braydon Bennett (Coastal Carolina), Terion Stewart (Bowling Green), and Marcellous Hawkins (Division II).
The defensive front adds Ben Bell (Texas State), Arias Nash (Mercer All-SoCon Second-Team), and Jahzari Priester.
Secondary help comes via safety Sherrod Covil Jr. (Clemson) and defensive back Isaiah Brown-Murray (East Carolina).
How quickly this rebuilt roster can develop chemistry may ultimately determine Virginia Tech’s ceiling in 2025.
Position-by-Position: Areas of Strength and Concern
The quarterback position represents a rare island of stability.
Kyron Drones returns after an up-and-down 2024 campaign that showed flashes of brilliance amid consistency issues. His dual-threat capabilities (completing 136 of 224 passes for 1,562 yards and 10 touchdowns, while also being a running threat) give Philip Montgomery an intriguing centerpiece around which to build his offense.
William “Pop” Watson III also returns, providing experienced depth and competition after completing 34 of 58 passes for 481 yards and a touchdown in limited action last season. The quarterback room’s development under Montgomery’s tutelage will be crucial to elevating an offense that struggled with passing consistency in 2024, averaging just 189.4 yards per game through the air with a 59% completion rate.
Beyond quarterback, uncertainty reigns:
Running Back: The competition between transfers Stewart, Bennett, and Hawkins should be one of fall camp’s most closely watched battles, with Cameron Seldon’s versatility adding another dimension.
Wide Receiver: Young talent like Takye Heath, Keylen Adams, and Chanz Wiggins offers promise but limited experience. Montgomery’s system typically features significant receiver involvement, making this group’s development essential.
Defensive Line: Following the departures of Powell-Ryland and Peebles, the defensive line will be completely rebuilt. Transfers Nash, Priester, and Bell must have an immediate impact, particularly in the pass rush.
Secondary: After allowing nearly 216 passing yards per game in 2024, Covil and Brown-Murray additions add importance for a unit that must create more turnovers after finishing 2024 with a negative turnover margin.
The marriage between new personnel and new schemes will define Virginia Tech’s 2025 campaign.
The Schedule Gauntlet: No Room for Early Stumbles
Virginia Tech’s path to improvement doesn’t come with any warmup period.
The Hokies open with consecutive games against SEC opposition, setting a challenging tone for the season. This mirrors their 2024 start when they opened with a disappointing 34-27 loss at Vanderbilt that set the stage for early-season struggles. The upcoming ACC slate features traditional rivals and emerging powers, creating few opportunities for reprieve, especially after going 2-2 against non-conference opponents last season.
Analysts have offered mixed projections:
Some forecast a modest improvement to 7-5
Others anticipate another 6-6 finish
Most agree that anything less than six wins could trigger significant changes in Blacksburg.
The margin between progress and regression appears razor-thin.
The Defining Factors: Five Keys to Success
Several critical elements will determine whether 2025 becomes a turning point or just another chapter of continued stagnation.
Offensive Evolution: Philip Montgomery’s impact on the offense, particularly in developing a more consistent passing attack to complement the running game, could transform the Hokies’ scoring potential.
Defensive Identity: How quickly Sam Siefkes can implement his system and develop cohesion among a unit featuring numerous new faces will be critical to the team’s overall success.
Transfer Integration: With so many roster additions via the transfer portal, team chemistry and rapid assimilation will be essential, especially during early-season challenges.
Close-Game Execution: After struggling in one-score games in 2024, improving late-game situations could be the difference between bowl eligibility and a losing record.
Coaching Stability: The pressure on Pry and his revamped staff creates urgency and uncertainty. How the staff handles this pressure will set the tone for player performance.
For Virginia Tech, 2025 represents more than just another season—it’s a referendum on the program’s direction under Brent Pry’s leadership.
With significant changes in personnel and coaching philosophy, the Hokies have embraced transformation in pursuit of returning to their former prominence. While the challenges are substantial—from replacing departed stars to navigating a difficult schedule—there’s cautious optimism in Blacksburg that the infusion of transfer talent coupled with strategic coaching changes provides a pathway to improvement.
As Lane Stadium prepares to echo once again with “Enter Sandman,” the stakes couldn’t be higher.
Four consecutive 3-9 seasons have left Stanford football fans wondering if they’re stuck in a cruel time loop.
But 2025 brings dramatic changes that could finally alter the program’s trajectory:
Andrew Luck returns as the program’s first-ever General Manager
Head coach Troy Taylor enters year three firmly on the hot seat
Sophomore quarterback Elijah Brown steps into the spotlight
A wave of transfer portal additions aims to patch glaring weaknesses
Athletic Director Bernard Muir prepares to step down after 13 years
Let’s examine why this season could bring Cardinal football either a new dawn or cement its fall from relevance.
Andrew Luck’s Return Could Be Stanford’s Game-Changer
The most fascinating college football experiment of 2025 is happening on The Farm.
Andrew Luck—Stanford legend, former #1 NFL draft pick, and the face of the program’s golden era—returns in the unprecedented role of General Manager. This unconventional move signals that Stanford recognizes business as usual isn’t working.
But what exactly will Luck’s role entail?
Taking administrative burdens off Taylor’s plate so he can focus on coaching
Leveraging his Stanford connections for recruiting and alumni relations
Working directly on roster management and transfer portal strategy
Bringing strategic football insights from his NFL experience
Boosting the program’s visibility and credibility nationally
The partnership is designed to allow Taylor to focus more on coaching and game planning while Luck manages other aspects of the program. If Luck’s football acumen translates to his front office role, this arrangement could significantly benefit the on-field product.
The arrangement represents a strategic lifeline for Taylor, who gains both a valuable resource and a potential buffer against mounting pressure.
Troy Taylor’s Hot Seat Is Scorching
The math doesn’t look good for Stanford’s third-year head coach.
Taylor’s .250 winning percentage (6-18) falls dramatically below what Coaches Hot Seat analysts calculate as the minimum acceptable threshold of .506 for Stanford coaches. The consecutive 3-9 seasons have tested the patience of even the most understanding Cardinal supporters.
Why the pressure is mounting:
Multiple college football experts, including Andy Staples and On3 analysts, have specifically named Taylor on their 2025 hot seat lists
Last year’s 59-28 loss to NC State was viewed by many as a breaking point
Stanford’s defense ranked second-worst in FBS (461.7 yards allowed per game)
The Cardinal’s first season in the ACC failed to produce any noticeable improvement
Taylor’s recruiting success—including landing promising quarterback Bear Bachmeier for the 2025 class—provides some job security. But the administration’s willingness to make significant changes suggests that on-field results must follow the recruiting wins.
The Quarterback Room: Young, Talented, and Unproven
Stanford’s offensive future rests on sophomore Elijah Brown’s shoulders.
The former four-star ESPN 300 prospect saw limited action in 2024 due to injury but showed flashes of the talent that made him a coveted recruit. With veterans Ashton Daniels and Justin Lamson transferring out, Brown’s development becomes critical to Stanford’s offensive success.
What makes Brown a potential difference-maker:
Strong arm talent paired with pocket mobility
Full year of experience in Taylor’s system
High football IQ that fits Stanford’s academic profile
Natural leadership qualities that teammates respond to
Ceiling that far exceeds recent Cardinal quarterbacks
“Elijah has all the tools you want in a quarterback,” Taylor noted during spring practice. “He’s spent a year learning our system, and now it’s about translating that knowledge to game situations.”
The question remains whether Brown can elevate fast enough to make Stanford competitive in the unforgiving ACC.
Transfer Portal Reinforcements Target Key Weaknesses
Stanford’s approach to the transfer portal has evolved dramatically from previous years.
The Cardinal have added several key players to address glaring weaknesses from 2024:
Wide Receiver: Caden High (South Carolina State), Jordan Onovughe (Colorado), and CJ Williams (Wisconsin) replace NFL-bound Elic Ayomanor
Secondary: Jordan Washington, a first-team All-Ivy honoree, joins Collin Wright and Julian Neal to bolster a struggling pass defense.
Offensive Line: Multiple additions aim to rebuild a unit that allowed 39 sacks in 2024 (ranked 122nd nationally)
However, significant holes remain, particularly at linebacker following the departures of leading tacklers Tristan Sinclair and Gaethan Bernadel.
The success of these transfer additions will largely determine whether Stanford can compete in 2025 or face another losing season.
Statistical Identity Crisis Reveals Program Drift
Stanford football’s traditional identity has disappeared.
Once known for smashmouth running and stifling defense, the 2024 Cardinal barely resembled their successful predecessors:
Rushing offense: 132.7 yards per game (3.6 YPC)
Passing became primary weapon (191.3 YPG, 18 TDs)
Defense allowed 37.7 points per game (nearly last nationally)
Total defense gave up 461.7 yards per game (second-worst in FBS)
Pass defense surrendered 280.6 yards per game (131st nationally)
One positive trend: ball security. Stanford averaged just 1.8 turnovers per game, indicating good decision-making and protection.
For Stanford to return to relevance, they must either reclaim their traditional identity or fully commit to a new one under Taylor. The current statistical profile shows a program caught between philosophies.
2025 Schedule: Navigating The ACC Gauntlet
Stanford’s second ACC season presents both daunting challenges and potential breakthrough opportunities.
The most challenging matchups:
Miami: A potential ACC title contender
Notre Dame: The annual rivalry continues to be an uphill battle
North Carolina: Now led by legendary coach Bill Belichick
Florida State: Despite recent struggles, still a major talent advantage
Potential win opportunities:
Virginia: Home contest against another program in transition
San Jose State: Local matchup where Stanford should have talent edge
Boston College: Winnable ACC road game
“Our schedule is challenging, but that’s the reality of playing in the ACC,” Taylor acknowledged. “We’ve targeted several games where we believe we can compete at a high level.”
Five Players Who Will Define Stanford’s Season
The Cardinal’s success depends on breakthrough performances from these key players:
Elijah Brown (QB): The sophomore’s development into a consistent ACC-caliber quarterback could lift the entire offense.
David Bailey (DE): After recording 8.5 sacks in 2024, Bailey returns as the defense’s most disruptive force and must anchor an improved pass rush.
Emmett Mosley Jr. (WR): The sophomore showed promise in limited action last season and could emerge as Brown’s favorite target.
Micah Ford (RB): Stanford needs to reestablish its running game, and Ford has the physical tools to be the feature back.
Collin Wright (CB): As a veteran in the secondary, Wright must help stabilize a pass defense that ranked among the nation’s worst in 2024.
What Actually Counts As Progress In 2025?
After four consecutive 3-9 seasons, Stanford fans’ expectations have reached rock bottom.
Most analysts project the Cardinal to finish with 4-8 or 5-7 record, which would break their streak of three-win campaigns but still leave them short of bowl eligibility.
For Taylor to truly secure his position, Stanford must show:
Competitiveness against the ACC’s middle tier
Avoidance of embarrassing blowouts against elite teams
At least one signature upset victory
Development of young players like Brown, Mosley, and Bachmeier
Defensive improvement from abysmal to at least mediocre
A clear footballing identity, whether traditional Stanford or something new
Establishing an identity might be more important than the final record. Stanford’s traditional formula of physical offensive line play, a reliable running game, and disciplined defense provided a clear blueprint during the program’s successful years.
The bottom line? Stanford football stands at a crossroads.
The program has made unconventional moves—hiring Luck as GM and more aggressively embracing the transfer portal—to break free from the mediocrity that has defined recent seasons. Whether these changes translate to on-field success remains the program’s biggest question.
But for the first time in several seasons, there’s a palpable sense that Stanford football is evolving rather than stagnating—and for a proud program with championship ambitions, that represents the first step toward reclaiming relevance in the increasingly competitive landscape of college football.
Become an Insider
Don’t miss another deep dive into college football’s most crucial storylines and program developments. Our team-by-team analysis gives you the insider perspective to understand where each program is headed in 2025 and beyond. Subscribe for free now to access our comprehensive breakdowns, exclusive hot seat rankings, and in-depth conference analysis delivered to your inbox. Join thousands of college football insiders who trust Coaches Hot Seat to keep them ahead of the game. Hit the link below to unlock all our premium content and never miss another update.
The Pittsburgh Panthers are staring down a season that could define the next half-decade of their program.
Pitt’s 2024 Jekyll & Hyde Season Still Has Everyone Confused
The 2024 Pitt Panthers gave fans the football equivalent of whiplash.
First, they stunned the college football world by racing to a 7-0 start—their best since 1982. Then, they crashed and burned so spectacularly you’d think they’d forgotten how to play the game entirely, losing 6 straight to finish 7-6.
Here’s what makes this story so fascinating:
The Panthers started by beating rivals Cincinnati (28-27) and West Virginia (38-34) in back-to-back nail-biters
They climbed to #18 in the polls after demolishing Syracuse 41-13
They proceeded to lose every remaining game, including a wild 6-overtime bowl loss to Toledo
The team outgained opponents by 30+ yards per game while losing six straight
The craziest part? The stats show Pitt actually outperformed their opponents in nearly every category for the season. They gained more yards, created more first downs, and were more efficient in both passing and rushing.
So why on earth did they collapse so dramatically?
That’s the million-dollar question Pat Narduzzi needs to answer—fast.
The Superstars That Somehow Didn’t Transfer (And Why They Matter)
In the era of the transfer portal, keeping elite talent is half the battle.
Pitt won this round by retaining two genuine stars who could transform their 2025 campaign.
Kyle Louis (LB) isn’t just good—he’s an absolute defensive menace:
101 tackles (led team)
15.5 tackles for loss
7 sacks
4 interceptions
National ranking: #47 returning player
First-Team All-American honors
Desmond Reid (RB) is the definition of a triple-threat weapon:
966 rushing yards, 5 TDs
579 receiving yards, 4 TDs
159 punt return yards, 1 TD
6.5 yards per touch (elite efficiency)
National ranking: #80 returning player
These two stars give Pitt a foundation most ACC teams would kill for. But two players—even elite ones—can’t win games alone.
The real question is: will the rest of the roster step up?
The Most Important Position Battle That Will Make Or Break Pitt’s Season
Let’s cut to the chase: Pitt’s quarterback situation will determine everything in 2025.
The Panthers have a fascinating battle brewing between:
Eli Holstein – The sophomore who flashed potential (2,228 yards, 17 TDs) but struggled with consistency and decision-making (7 INTs)
Mason Heintschel – The incoming 4-star freshman with dazzling high school numbers (7,300+ yards, 79 TDs) and something to prove
Holstein brings experience and mobility (328 rushing yards, 3 TDs), while Heintschel brings the allure of untapped potential and a fresh arm.
Narduzzi’s quarterback decision won’t just impact the 2025 season—it could determine his own job security.
Every other position group looks solid. The quarterback room is where Pitt’s ceiling will be determined.
The Transfer Portal Gave And Took Away (But Mostly Gave)
The transfer portal hit Pitt with expected casualties: 20 players exited, gutting their secondary and depth chart.
But something unexpected happened on the way to disaster.
Pat Narduzzi quietly assembled one of the ACC’s most impressive transfer hauls:
Defensive Reinforcements:
Jaeden Moore (DE, Oregon) – Power 5 pass rusher
Joseph Zelinsky (DE, Eastern Michigan) – Senior leader
Blaine Spires (DE, Utah State) – Six years of experience
Jayden Bonsu (S/LB, Ohio State) – Versatile former 4-star
Offensive Additions:
Kendall Stanley (OT, UNC Charlotte) – Immediate line upgrade
Keith Gouveia (OG, Richmond) – Interior reinforcement
These aren’t depth pieces—they’re potential game-changers who address Pitt’s specific weaknesses from 2024.
The big question: can these transfers mesh quickly enough to make an immediate impact?
Pat Narduzzi’s Seat Is Heating Up (Despite A $30M Buyout)
After a decade at the helm, Narduzzi finds himself in unfamiliar territory: the hot seat.
The numbers tell a complex story:
72-56 record (.563 winning percentage)
2021 ACC Championship
Back-to-back Top 25 finishes (2021-2022)
10 First-Team All-Americans coached
But recent results have fans restless:
3-9 disaster in 2023
Epic 6-game collapse in 2024
2-5 bowl record
Mediocre recruiting rankings (60th in 2022, 53rd in 2023)
The elephant in the room? Narduzzi’s contract runs through 2030 with a rumored $30 million buyout.
That financial reality means 2025 isn’t just another season—it’s potentially a referendum on the entire program’s direction.
Three Make-or-Break Factors That Will Define Pitt’s 2025 Campaign
If you’re looking for the exact recipe for Pitt’s 2025 success (or failure), these three ingredients matter more than everything else combined:
1. Fourth Quarter Performance The Panthers led or were tied in the fourth quarter in 4 of their 6 losses. They don’t need to reinvent their program—they need to finish games.
2. Quarterback Decision & Development Whether Holstein takes a sophomore leap or Heintschel seizes the job as a freshman, Pitt needs dramatically improved QB play to compete for an ACC title.
3. November Mental Toughness Pitt went 0-5 in November/December last year. The team’s conditioning, depth, and psychological resilience all need massive upgrades to avoid another late-season collapse.
The good news? These are all fixable problems.
The bad news? Time is running out for Narduzzi to prove he can fix them.
The Bottom Line: 2025 Is When We Learn If Pitt Is A Contender Or Pretender
Pitt football is standing at a crossroads, and the 2025 season will reveal which path they’re truly on.
The talent and experience are there, and the hunger after last season’s collapse should be there.
What remains to be seen is whether the Panthers have learned from their 2024 Jekyll and Hyde act or if they’re doomed to repeat it.
For a program that held an ACC Championship trophy just three seasons ago, 2025 isn’t just another year—it’s a chance to prove it belongs among the conference elite.
Or it could be the beginning of the end for the Narduzzi era.
Either way, the Panthers won’t have to wait long to start answering these questions. The clock is already ticking toward kickoff.
Become an Insider
Don’t miss another deep dive into college football’s most crucial storylines and program developments. Our team-by-team analysis gives you the insider perspective to understand where each program is headed in 2025 and beyond. Subscribe for free now to access our comprehensive breakdowns, exclusive hot seat rankings, and in-depth conference analysis delivered to your inbox. Join thousands of college football insiders who trust Coaches Hot Seat to keep them ahead of the game. Hit the link below to unlock all our premium content and never miss another update.
Get insider college football intel delivered to your inbox
Want insider analysis on college football program moves before they happen? Get hard-hitting insights, no fluff – straight to your inbox. Subscribe to the Coaches Hot Seat newsletter and be on the cutting edge of what’s happening in the world of college football.
