In today’s reactive world, genuine leadership has become increasingly rare.
When Florida Gators men’s basketball coach Todd Golden faced serious misconduct allegations before the season, Athletic Director Scott Stricklin had a critical choice to make:
Take the easy path and suspend Golden immediately to protect the university’s reputation
Stand firm in the principles of due process and support his coach while the investigation unfolds
Bow to external pressure demanding immediate action
Risk his own career by refusing to rush to judgment
Trust that the truth would eventually emerge
Your ability to lead isn’t measured during times of prosperity, but in moments of intense pressure and scrutiny. Most leaders crumble when faced with public outrage and cancel culture. But the greatest leaders understand that true courage means standing by your principles when it would be easier not to. This is exactly what Scott Stricklin did for Todd Golden and the Florida Gators.
Stricklin’s Bold Stance Against Cancel Culture
According to Orlando Sentinel’s Mike Bianchi, Stricklin’s approach was nothing short of revolutionary in our current climate.
The easy move would have been immediate suspension. After all, nobody predicted the Gators would become a national championship contender. The stakes seemed low, and the potential PR damage high.
But Stricklin chose a different path.
He allowed the investigation to proceed without prejudgment, keeping Golden in his position despite the serious nature of the allegations. This wasn’t just a basketball decision—it was a moral one.
The Athletic Director’s Powerful Explanation
Stricklin recently explained his decision-making process to Bianchi with remarkable clarity.
“Both morally and legally, it was the right thing to do,” Stricklin stated. “Anyone can make an allegation, but it doesn’t mean it’s true. He [Golden] has rights just like the people who make allegations have rights. And so there’s a process and we followed that process.”
This single sentence reveals everything you need to know about Stricklin’s character.
The Foundation of Trust That Made It Possible
Why was Stricklin able to stand firm when others would have folded?
It came down to a foundation of trust built over time:
Golden had consistently demonstrated honesty since their first meeting
Stricklin had developed a leadership philosophy built on investing in people
He understood that even successful individuals occasionally face challenges
He remembered Billy Donovan’s wisdom that great coaches overcome adversity without distraction
“Todd has been completely honest and truthful since I first met him and I had no reason to think that was any different in this situation,” Stricklin explained.
The Lesson Every Leader Should Take Away
The next time you’re faced with a crisis, remember Scott Stricklin.
Instead of reacting to public pressure, he stayed true to his principles and allowed due process to unfold. Rather than protecting his own reputation at all costs, he risked it by standing by his coach.
As Stricklin himself said, “You’re investing in people. And I have a lot of faith in our people.”
That’s what real leadership looks like.
Become an Insider
Don’t miss another deep dive into college football’s most crucial storylines and program developments. Our team-by-team analysis gives you the insider perspective to understand where each program is headed in 2025 and beyond. Subscribe for free now to access our comprehensive breakdowns, exclusive hot seat rankings, and in-depth conference analysis delivered to your inbox. Join thousands of college football insiders who trust Coaches Hot Seat to keep them ahead of the game. Hit the link below to unlock all our premium content and never miss another update.
In the high-stakes college football casino, the usual season-end trading frenzy has given way to something more unusual: fiscal restraint. We’re calling it “The Great Coaching Correction of 2024.” You see, athletic departments across the country are staring down a triple-witching hour of financial obligations that would make even a seasoned hedge fund manager break into a cold sweat: massive coaching buyouts, the impending $20 million House settlement expense per school, and another estimated $20 million (first year) hit from revenue sharing with athletes. Suddenly, the market for coaching talent is behaving less like cryptocurrency in 2021 and more like banks during a Federal Reserve stress test.
Billy Napier, Florida
Consider Billy Napier at Florida, a case study in modern football economics. In a world where 70% of Florida’s NIL payments flow to underclassmen—a stat that would make any Wall Street analyst question the business model’s sustainability—Napier has somehow convinced his CEO, Scott Strickland, to double down on their position. It’s the contrarian bet that either makes or ends careers. The market had priced Napier for failure after the Miami and Texas A&M disasters, but like a value investor spotting hidden assets, Strickland saw something others missed: stability in chaos. Or perhaps more accurately, he saw the price tag of starting over.
Napier’s Change Meter: Ice Cold
Sam Pittman, Arkansas
Meanwhile, Sam Pittman presents a different sort of market inefficiency in Arkansas. At 62, with a hip that’s giving out, he’s like an aging blue-chip stock with solid fundamentals but questionable long-term prospects. The twist? This comes courtesy of Jackson Collier of the Hardwood Hawgs Podcast – hidden in plain sight in his contract is a provision that would make any compensation committee blush: hit seven wins, including a bowl game, and trigger an automatic extension and raise. This incentive structure would make even the most hardened private equity executive wonder about governance. Let me repeat that – if he gets to seven wins – LA Tech plus one other, including the bowl – he gets a raise and extension. Completely doable.
Pittman’s Change Meter: Cool
Dave Aranda, Baylor
But the real arbitrage play is happening in Waco, Texas, where Dave Aranda’s job security has behaved like a volatile tech stock—swooping early, rebounding late, and keeping traders guessing. After opening 2-4 with wins against only Air Force and something called Tarleton State, Aranda’s position looked about as secure as a crypto wallet password. Yet here he is, three wins later, trading above his September lows on volume. His contract runs through 2029, and in this bear market for buyouts, that’s starting to look less like a liability and more like a forced diamond-hands strategy. If he is a smidge above .500, he stays.
Change Meter: Lukewarm trending cool
Charles Huff, Marshall
The distressed assets division brings us to Marshall’s Charles Huff, a coach whose contract is expiring like a soon-to-mature junk bond. At 27-20 over four seasons, including a telling 5-1 against non-Power Four competition this year, Huff’s position looks like a classic case of a middle-market firm unable to compete with the more prominent players. The smart money is betting on a change, though in this capital-constrained environment, even obvious moves come with additional scrutiny.
Huff’s Change Meter: Hot
Kevin Wilson, Tulsa
Then there’s Kevin Wilson at Tulsa, running a program performing like a penny stock in a bear market. When your highlight reel consists of a single comeback win against UTSA and a victory over 3-5 Louisiana Tech, you’re trading in territory usually reserved for companies about to be delisted. At 5-14 in two seasons, Wilson—a former blue-chip coordinator at Ohio State and Oklahoma—has turned premium pedigree into discount-bin performance.
Wilson’s Change Meter: Hot
Trent Dilfer, UAB
The most fascinating short position in the market might be Trent Dilfer at UAB. In less than two years, he’s taken Bill Clark’s ascending program—six straight winning seasons, two conference titles—and performed a dismantling usually reserved for failed hedge funds. His now-infamous “It’s not like this is freakin’ Alabama” quip reads like a CEO dismissing disappointing earnings by saying, “We’re not Apple.” The market rarely forgives such hubris, but at a $4.1 million buyout, the cost of forgiveness in this economy starts to look like a luxury good.
Dilfer’s Change Meter: Hot to Warm
Don Brown, UMass
At the extreme end of the risk spectrum sits Don Brown at UMass, whose position has moved from “distressed asset” to “complete write-off.” The market has spoken, and this particular security is being delisted.
Brown’s Change Meter: Scorching
High Profile, Power 4 Rumored Hot Seats
However, perhaps the most telling indicator comes from the “too big to fail” institutions—Florida State, USC, Oklahoma, Nebraska—where the Mike Norvells and Lincoln Rileys of the world operate with the kind of security usually reserved for government bonds. These programs have determined that stability, even at a premium, is preferable to the volatility of the coaching free agency market, especially with the looming costs of settlements and revenue sharing casting shadows over their balance sheets.
Change Meter: Ice Cold
Ultimately, college football’s coaching market operates with all the efficiency of a teenager with their first credit card. It overreacts to both success and failure, frequently misprices assets, and occasionally makes moves that would make a bankruptcy lawyer blush. But like all markets, it eventually finds its level—even if that level involves paying millions to make someone go away. This year, though, a cold dose of fiscal reality has tempered the usual irrational exuberance. When your industry is staring down $40+ million in new mandatory expenses, even the most trigger-happy athletic director thinks twice about adding another eight-figure buyout to the books.
The college football coaching carousel is spinning.
Four coaches have been shown the door this year, even before Mike Bloomgren got the boot at Rice over the weekend. Let’s recap:
Jeff Tedford (Fresno State): Stepped down in July due to health concerns. It was a tough break for Fresno State, as Tedford had them back on track.
Blake Anderson (Utah State): Fired in July after allegedly contacting a domestic violence victim and witness. It is a serious situation and a reminder that off-field issues can have major consequences.
Will Hall (Southern Miss): Let go after a disappointing 1-6 start. Sometimes, the results aren’t there, and a change is needed.
Mike Houston (East Carolina): Also fired after a rough start to the season. This is another case of expectations not being met.
With Bloomgren out at Rice, there will be five coaching changes in October. We expect fewer coaching changes than we saw during the 2023 season, but the pace of changes will accelerate as the season continues.
Well, folks, the Mike Bloomgren experiment in Houston has finally ended. Rice has decided to move on from their head coach after seven seasons, a 24-52 record, and a disappointing 2-6 start to this year.
Bloomgren did manage to get the Owls to back-to-back bowl games, which is something, I guess. But let’s be honest, a losing record like that just isn’t cut it in today’s college football landscape.
It’s tough to see a coach lose his job, but sometimes a change is necessary. Hopefully, Rice can find someone to take them to the next level.
As for Bloomgren, I’m sure he’ll land on his feet somewhere. He’s a good coach with a solid track record. Maybe a fresh start is precisely what he needs.
The Coaching Carousel is Picking Up
The college football coaching carousel is spinning.
Four coaches have been shown the door this year, even before Bloomgren got the boot. Let’s recap:
Jeff Tedford (Fresno State): Stepped down in July due to health concerns. It was a tough break for Fresno State, as Tedford had them back on track.
Blake Anderson (Utah State): Fired in July after allegedly contacting a domestic violence victim and witness. It is a serious situation and a reminder that off-field issues can have major consequences.
Will Hall (Southern Miss): Let go after a disappointing 1-6 start. Sometimes, the results aren’t there, and a change is needed.
Mike Houston (East Carolina): Also fired after a rough start to the season. This is another case of expectations not being met.
With Bloomgren out at Rice, there will be five coaching changes in October. We expect fewer coaching changes than we saw during the 2023 season, but the pace of changes will accelerate as the season continues.
We’ve all been there. Your team is on a losing streak, the season’s slipping away, and that “Fire the coach!” chant starts echoing in your head. It’s cathartic. It feels like someone is taking action, like something is being done to right the ship.
Lately, however, athletic directors seem to be hitting the “snooze” button on those hot seat alarms. Coaches who, in years past, would be packing their bags are somehow clinging to their jobs. Why?
Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the financial cost.
Firing a coach isn’t just about the head coach’s buyout (though those numbers are eye-popping enough on their own, as you can see in the chart below featuring buyouts for the top 20 on our Coaches Hot Seat Rankings). There’s a ripple effect that impacts the entire athletic department and can hamstring a program for years.
Take a look at that list. Those buyout numbers are staggering. Schools are paying tens of millions of dollars to coaches not to coach. That money could be used to improve facilities, hire top-tier assistants, and support other athletic programs.
And it’s not just the head coach’s salary. Assistant coaches have buyouts, too, which can add millions more to the tab. Suddenly, that “quick fix” looks like a costly gamble.
But wait, there’s more!
As if those costs weren’t enough, the recent House v. NCAA settlement has created a new financial landscape in college athletics. Schools can now directly pay their athletes a share of the revenue they generate. This is a game-changer, but it also means athletic departments have even less financial wiggle room. Those House settlement expenses are estimated to be around $20 million per school in 2025.
Think about it: a massive buyout combined with the new athlete compensation rules can seriously strain a school’s budget. And it’s not like the spending stops there. You’re still paying the fired coach and his staff NOT to coach while simultaneously shelling out money for the new coaching staff’s salaries. It’s like trying to buy a new car while paying off your student loans and a hefty credit card bill and still making payments on the old car you just traded in. Something’s gotta give.
So, what’s the takeaway?
It seems athletic directors are thinking twice before hitting that panic button. They’re facing a financial landscape that demands a more strategic approach. They’re weighing the long-term costs and benefits instead of bowing to pressure and making a rash decision. Maybe those hot seat coaches are getting a longer leash because school administrators are playing the long game, prioritizing financial stability and sustainable success over quick fixes.
Sometimes, patience and a long-term strategy are the more intelligent plays, even if they don’t provide the instant gratification of a coaching change.
What do you think? Is the cost of firing a coach worth it? Let me know here.
Man, the coaching hot seat is scorching right now. First Mike Houston at ECU, and now Will Hall at Southern Miss? It’s a brutal reminder that winning is the only thing that matters in college football.
Hall came to Hattiesburg with a ton of promise. Deep ties to Mississippi and a successful stint at Tulane – it felt like a perfect fit. But sometimes, even the best-laid plans go up in flames.
A 1-6 start? Ouch. That’s not just a slump; that’s a full-blown meltdown. And when your only win comes against an FCS team? Well, let’s say the writing was on the wall.
Look, I’m not here to pile on. Coaching is a tough gig, especially in today’s pressure cooker environment. But the reality is, results matter. Fans demand them, and athletic directors expect them. When those results don’t come, something’s got to give.
It’s easy to point fingers at the offense, the defense, or the players. But at the end of the day, the head coach is the one who takes the fall. That’s the burden of leadership and a heavy one to bear.
So, what’s next for Southern Miss? They’ve got an interim coach in place, and the search for a new leader is on. It’s a chance for a fresh start, a new vision, a renewed sense of hope.
But for Will Hall, it’s a tough lesson learned. In this game, you’re only as good as your last season. And sometimes, that’s just not good enough.
Get insider college football intel delivered to your inbox
Want insider analysis on college football program moves before they happen? Get hard-hitting insights, no fluff – straight to your inbox. Subscribe to the Coaches Hot Seat newsletter and be on the cutting edge of what’s happening in the world of college football.
