Blog Article

Bloomgren Era Ends at Rice – Fifth Coaching Change This Season

Mark Haines on October 28, 2024

Well, folks, the Mike Bloomgren experiment in Houston has finally ended. Rice has decided to move on from their head coach after seven seasons, a 24-52 record, and a disappointing 2-6 start to this year.

Bloomgren did manage to get the Owls to back-to-back bowl games, which is something, I guess. But let’s be honest, a losing record like that just isn’t cut it in today’s college football landscape.

It’s tough to see a coach lose his job, but sometimes a change is necessary. Hopefully, Rice can find someone to take them to the next level.

As for Bloomgren, I’m sure he’ll land on his feet somewhere. He’s a good coach with a solid track record. Maybe a fresh start is precisely what he needs.

The Coaching Carousel is Picking Up

The college football coaching carousel is spinning.

Four coaches have been shown the door this year, even before Bloomgren got the boot. Let’s recap:

Jeff Tedford (Fresno State): Stepped down in July due to health concerns. It was a tough break for Fresno State, as Tedford had them back on track.
Blake Anderson (Utah State): Fired in July after allegedly contacting a domestic violence victim and witness. It is a serious situation and a reminder that off-field issues can have major consequences.
Will Hall (Southern Miss): Let go after a disappointing 1-6 start. Sometimes, the results aren’t there, and a change is needed.
Mike Houston (East Carolina): Also fired after a rough start to the season. This is another case of expectations not being met.

With Bloomgren out at Rice, there will be five coaching changes in October. We expect fewer coaching changes than we saw during the 2023 season, but the pace of changes will accelerate as the season continues.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

Why ‘Fire the Coach!’ Feels Like a Solution, But Multi-Million Dollar Buyouts Say Otherwise

Mark Haines on October 23, 2024

We’ve all been there. Your team is on a losing streak, the season’s slipping away, and that “Fire the coach!” chant starts echoing in your head. It’s cathartic. It feels like someone is taking action, like something is being done to right the ship.

Lately, however, athletic directors seem to be hitting the “snooze” button on those hot seat alarms. Coaches who, in years past, would be packing their bags are somehow clinging to their jobs. Why?

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the financial cost.

Firing a coach isn’t just about the head coach’s buyout (though those numbers are eye-popping enough on their own, as you can see in the chart below featuring buyouts for the top 20 on our Coaches Hot Seat Rankings). There’s a ripple effect that impacts the entire athletic department and can hamstring a program for years.

Take a look at that list. Those buyout numbers are staggering. Schools are paying tens of millions of dollars to coaches not to coach. That money could be used to improve facilities, hire top-tier assistants, and support other athletic programs.

And it’s not just the head coach’s salary. Assistant coaches have buyouts, too, which can add millions more to the tab. Suddenly, that “quick fix” looks like a costly gamble.

But wait, there’s more!

As if those costs weren’t enough, the recent House v. NCAA settlement has created a new financial landscape in college athletics. Schools can now directly pay their athletes a share of the revenue they generate. This is a game-changer, but it also means athletic departments have even less financial wiggle room. Those House settlement expenses are estimated to be around $20 million per school in 2025.

Think about it: a massive buyout combined with the new athlete compensation rules can seriously strain a school’s budget. And it’s not like the spending stops there. You’re still paying the fired coach and his staff NOT to coach while simultaneously shelling out money for the new coaching staff’s salaries. It’s like trying to buy a new car while paying off your student loans and a hefty credit card bill and still making payments on the old car you just traded in. Something’s gotta give.

So, what’s the takeaway?

It seems athletic directors are thinking twice before hitting that panic button. They’re facing a financial landscape that demands a more strategic approach. They’re weighing the long-term costs and benefits instead of bowing to pressure and making a rash decision. Maybe those hot seat coaches are getting a longer leash because school administrators are playing the long game, prioritizing financial stability and sustainable success over quick fixes.

Sometimes, patience and a long-term strategy are the more intelligent plays, even if they don’t provide the instant gratification of a coaching change.

What do you think? Is the cost of firing a coach worth it? Let me know here.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

Another One Bites the Dust: Will Hall and the Southern Miss Saga

Mark Haines on October 21, 2024

Man, the coaching hot seat is scorching right now. First Mike Houston at ECU, and now Will Hall at Southern Miss? It’s a brutal reminder that winning is the only thing that matters in college football.

Hall came to Hattiesburg with a ton of promise. Deep ties to Mississippi and a successful stint at Tulane – it felt like a perfect fit. But sometimes, even the best-laid plans go up in flames.

A 1-6 start? Ouch. That’s not just a slump; that’s a full-blown meltdown. And when your only win comes against an FCS team? Well, let’s say the writing was on the wall.

Look, I’m not here to pile on. Coaching is a tough gig, especially in today’s pressure cooker environment. But the reality is, results matter. Fans demand them, and athletic directors expect them. When those results don’t come, something’s got to give.

It’s easy to point fingers at the offense, the defense, or the players. But at the end of the day, the head coach is the one who takes the fall. That’s the burden of leadership and a heavy one to bear.

So, what’s next for Southern Miss? They’ve got an interim coach in place, and the search for a new leader is on. It’s a chance for a fresh start, a new vision, a renewed sense of hope.

But for Will Hall, it’s a tough lesson learned. In this game, you’re only as good as your last season. And sometimes, that’s just not good enough.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

The Ship Has Sailed: Mike Houston and the Harsh Realities of College Football

Mark Haines on October 20, 2024

Let’s be honest: college football is a ruthless business. It’s a world where expectations are sky-high, patience wears thin, and yesterday’s hero can quickly become today’s casualty. Mike Houston just learned that lesson the hard way.

He arrived at East Carolina with a vision, ready to rebuild a program yearning for success. And for a while, it seemed like he was building something special. Back-to-back winning seasons and a bowl game victory were tangible signs of progress. But as anyone who’s ever played the game knows, momentum can shift instantly.

The 2023 season was a brutal turning point. A dismal 2-10 record exposed cracks in the foundation, and the pressure started mounting. Despite a glimmer of hope early in 2024, that crushing loss to Charlotte felt like a knockout punch.

Losing stings. But in this game, losing to your in-state rivals? That stings even more. An 0-7 record against North Carolina FBS schools? That’s a tough pill to swallow for any fanbase.

Let’s not forget the ever-spinning carousel of talent. College football today is a different beast. The transfer portal, NIL deals—it’s a constant battle to keep your roster stocked with playmakers. Houston struggled to navigate those choppy waters, ultimately costing him.

Now, the Pirates are left picking up the pieces, searching for a new captain to steer the ship. It’s a reminder that in this world, you’re only as good as your last season.

So, who’s next on the chopping block? The coaching hot seat is heating up, and the drama is just getting started. This is college football in 2024.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

The $110 Million Question: Is Lincoln Riley’s USC Experiment Unraveling?

Mark Haines on October 18, 2024

Picture this: It’s 2021, and USC just dropped a cool $110 million on Lincoln Riley, college football’s offensive wunderkind. The champagne’s flowing, the Spirit of Troy – the greatest marching band in the history of the universe – is playing “Conquest,” and Trojan fans are waving the “victory” sign while simultaneously dreaming of national titles.

Fast-forward to 2024, and the Trojans are stumbling into the Big Ten with offensive and defensive lines as sturdy as a Hollywood movie set. Fans wonder if they’ve bought tickets to a blockbuster or a B-movie flop.

What’s going on? Let’s break it down, play by excruciating play.

The Golden Boy’s Tarnished Crown

Remember when Riley was the toast of Los Angeles? Seems like ancient history now.

Year one: 11-3. Not bad. Riley waltzed in, waved his offensive magic wand, and voila! USC was relevant again. Caleb Williams did his best Houdini impression on the field, escaping tackles and expectations. The Trojans were back, baby!

Or so we thought.

Year two: A stumble. The offense still hummed, but the trenches? They were like a revolving door in a hurricane.

Year three: A faceplant into Big Ten reality. USC’s gone 8-8 against power conference teams since that 2022 Pac-12 title game loss. Ouch. It’s like watching a Hollywood blockbuster with amazing special effects but a plot full of holes.

But here’s the kicker: Riley’s teams are getting pushed around like a shopping cart in a tornado. Michigan and Minnesota – yes, Minnesota, land of 10,000 lakes and 11 immovable defensive linemen – manhandled USC in the trenches.

The Trojans have become the fancy sports car that can’t handle a pothole. All flash, no bash.

The Numbers Game: Hot Seat Alert

Hold onto your visors, folks. The number crunchers here at Coaches Hot Seat have cooked up a fancy algorithm, and it’s spelling trouble in Tommy Trojan land. Our proprietary metric, “Minimum Acceptable” (MA) winning percentage for USC? A cool .697.

Riley’s current record? It’s dipped below that magic number faster than a Hollywood star’s career after a bad facelift. We’re talking .667 overall, with a measly .308 against ranked teams. Yikes!

Winning percentage for Jones, McKay, Robinson I, Carroll, and Riley after eight games into their 3rd year at USC. The blue line represents USC’s minimum acceptable winning percentage before the seat starts to heat up (as determined by Coaches Hot Seat.)

Winning record vs AP Ranked teams after eight games into the 3rd year at USC for each coach. AP Rankings started in 1936, so Howard Jones is omitted.

The Ghost of Trojans Past

Let’s talk about expectations. At USC, they’re higher than the Hollywood sign.

Howard Jones, John McKay, John Robinson I, Pete Carroll. These aren’t just names; they’re legends. By year three, they were all either holding national championship trophies or knocking on the door.

Howard Jones? By year three, he had USC steamrolling towards its first national title. The man built a football powerhouse when LA’s biggest attraction was still orange groves.

John McKay? Year three, 1962. National champs. Boom. He invented “Student Body Right” and ran it down everyone’s throat. Why? Because he could.

John Robinson I? National title by year three. The man could recruit and develop talent like he had a crystal ball and a hypnotist on staff.

Pete Carroll? Okay, he took until year three to win a national title. Slacker. But by then, USC was already the coolest show in town. Half of Hollywood was at practice, and the other half wished they were.

Riley? He’s still trying to figure out which door to knock on. It’s like he’s got the keys to a Ferrari but can’t find the ignition.

The Rebuild Reality Check

Now, before we get too caught up in the USC glory days, let’s take a quick detour to Reality Check Boulevard. Remember Nick Saban at Alabama? Jim Harbaugh at Michigan? These guys didn’t exactly set the world on fire right out of the gate, either.

Saban, the holy grail of college coaching, went a pedestrian 7-6 in his first year at Alabama. It took him three seasons to bring home the national title. Harbaugh? He needed seven years to finally beat Ohio State and make the College Football Playoff.

So, is Riley behind schedule? Maybe. But he’s not exactly in uncharted territory. The difference? Saban and Harbaugh embraced their school’s cultures faster than a Hollywood starlet embraces Botox. They recruited locally like their lives depended on it. And most importantly, they built their teams from the trenches out.

Riley’s got the time. But does he have the blueprint?

The Trenches: From Sandcastle to Fortress?

Here’s where things get interesting, folks. Right now, USC’s offensive and defensive lines are about as imposing as a velvet rope at a nightclub. But hold your horses – or should we say, hold your Trojans.

Riley’s squad is full of raw talent that is developing faster than a Polaroid picture. These young warriors are busting their chops every day, and word on the street is that next year, they might just transform from a sandcastle into a fortress. It’s like watching a before-and-after montage in a Hollywood makeover film—the potential is there; it just needs time to be realized.

But here’s the rub: being young and promising in college football is like bringing a spork to a knife fight. You might make some interesting moves, but you’re not winning many battles… yet. The key word here is ‘yet.’

This is the late-season record for Jones, McKay, Robinson I, Carrol, and Riley through week eight of each respective coach’s third season.

The Recruiting Puzzle: Missing Pieces in USC’s Own Backyard

Here’s a wild stat: In the last three years, USC signed just 15% of California’s top 60 high school players. None were linemen.

Let that sink in.

USC, the program that once had SoCal high schools on speed dial, is now the stranger at the party. It’s like forgetting your ATM pin at your local bank.

Riley and his staff? They’re like tourists in their own recruiting backyard. Local high school coaches, once USC’s best friends, are wondering if Riley even knows their names.

One prominent SoCal coach (let’s call him Coach X – this isn’t the Marvel Universe, but secret identities matter) put it bluntly: “I’ve had more meaningful conversations with my Uber drivers than with USC’s recruiting staff.”

Ouch. That’s gonna leave a mark.

It’s like a Hollywood star forgetting where they came from. And in college football, that’s a cardinal sin. Make that a cardinal and gold sin.

The Transfer Portal: College Football’s Fool’s Gold?

Riley’s leaning on the transfer portal like it’s a crutch. Sure, it’s flashy. It makes headlines. “USC Lands 5-Star Transfer!” Sounds great, right?

But here’s the thing: Riley’s building a house with rental furniture. It looks great for the open house, but what happens when the lease is up?

The Offensive Conundrum: A One-Man Band

Here’s a plot twist: Riley, the offensive genius, needs help. Shocking, right? It’s like finding out Gordon Ramsay can’t make a grilled cheese.

Word on the street is that Riley needs to hire an offensive coordinator who knows the run game, like Riley knows Instagram filters. Someone to collaborate with, to balance out that air-raid obsession. Because right now, Riley’s offense is as one-dimensional as a paper doll.

And while we’re at it, how about Riley starts acting like a head coach? You know, the guy who’s supposed to oversee the whole shebang, not just the fancy passing plays. Right now, he’s outsourcing the defense like it’s a call center, taking zero responsibility when things go south. That’s not leadership; that’s dodgeball.

The Media Game: Riley’s Fumble

Here’s where it gets interesting. USC is Hollywood’s team. The media isn’t just part of the job; it’s part of the show.

McKay had one-liners sharper than a Spielberg script. Following the 51–0 loss to Notre Dame in 1966, “I told my team it doesn’t matter. There are 750 million people in China who don’t even know this game was played. The next day, a guy called me from China and asked, ‘What happened, Coach?” Boom. Mic drop before mic drops were a thing.

Robinson made reporters feel like family. He spun yarns that would make Mark Twain jealous. The media didn’t just cover USC; they were part of the story.

Carroll? He turned press conferences into pep rallies. He was P.T. Barnum in khakis and a headset. The man could sell sunshine to Southern California.

Riley? He’s treating the media like a blitz he can’t read. Cantankerous. Defensive. It’s a bad look; in LA, looks matter – just ask any Hollywood producer.

After a recent loss, Riley snapped at a reporter, “You clearly don’t understand football if you’re asking that question.” Yikes. That’s not burning bridges; that’s nuking them from orbit.

And it’s not just the media. Former players? They feel about as welcome as a vegan at a barbecue. The Trojan Family? More like the Trojan Distant Cousins Twice Removed.

The Tradition Gap: Riley’s Cultural Blindspot

Here’s a shocker: Riley is about as connected to USC tradition as a flip phone is to 5G. He has the Trojan history book, but it might as well be written in hieroglyphics.

Open practices? Nah, Fort Knox is more accessible. The legendary #55 jersey for linebackers? Gathering dust. The Notre Dame rivalry? Riley’s campaigning to drop it faster than a Hollywood diva drops last season’s fashion.

It’s like he’s directing a remake of a classic film but hasn’t bothered to watch the original. No wonder the team comes out flatter than week-old soda against rivals like Notre Dame and UCLA.

During his first season, Riley’s teams performed well against UCLA and Notre Dame. Last year, they came out “flat” and lost to both. Note: UCLA’s first game against USC occurred at the end of Jones’s third season, and the first against Notre Dame occurred during Jones’s second season.

The Big Ten Reality Check

USC is about to trade in its surfboard for a snow shovel. The Big Ten isn’t just a new conference; it’s a whole new world. It’s like moving from “Baywatch” to “Game of Thrones.” Winter is coming, and USC looks woefully underprepared.

If Minnesota pushed USC around, what would happen against Ohio State? It’s like watching a chess player realize he’s signed up for a boxing match.

Riley’s offenses are Ferraris. The Big Ten? It’s demolition derby country. USC’s about to learn that sometimes, you need a tank, not a sports car.

The Long Game: USC’s Football Future

Here’s the thing about college football: today’s decisions echo into tomorrow faster than you can say “dynasty.” Riley’s current approach isn’t just affecting win-loss columns; it’s reshaping USC’s entire football ecosystem.

By neglecting local high school relationships, Riley risks more than just missing out on the next star quarterback. He’s potentially dismantling decades-old pipelines that have fed USC’s success. It’s like cutting off the roots and expecting the tree to grow taller.

And that cultural disconnect? It’s not just annoying alumni. It’s slowly eroding the very identity that made USC football a brand name. The Trojan mystique, that intangible quality that made kids dream of wearing cardinal and gold, is fading faster than a Hollywood star’s relevance.

If Riley doesn’t course correct, USC might win some games, but at what cost? A program that feels more like a mercenary squad than a storied college football powerhouse? A fanbase more connected to their transfer portal apps than their own team’s history?

The clock isn’t just ticking on Riley’s tenure. It’s ticking on USC’s football soul.

The $87 Million Question

Here’s the rub: Riley has an $87 million buyout, and he’s not going anywhere soon. That’s not a contract; it’s a fortress with a moat full of money.

But in college football, “soon” is relative. Two more seasons of this, and even that golden parachute might not look so shiny. It’ll be more like a lead balloon.

Jennifer Cohen, USC’s athletic director, is putting on a brave face worthy of a Spielberg close-up. “I have full confidence in him,” she says, with all the conviction of a B-list actor swearing they’re “just friends” with their co-star. But here’s the twist in our Hollywood tale: Cohen didn’t cast Riley in this big-budget drama, and word on the Tinseltown grapevine is that their chemistry reads about as well as “Ishtar.”

The Bottom Line

Is Lincoln Riley’s seat hot? Not yet. But it’s warming up faster than a Kardashian’s Instagram post.

The next two seasons aren’t just crucial. They’re everything. Riley needs to:

Remember SoCal high schools exist. Maybe take a tour. Kiss babies. Whatever it takes.
Keep beefing up those trenches and polishing those special teams. Currently, USC’s lines are about as imposing as a velvet rope at a nightclub—they’re a work in progress, And their special teams are more “special” than “team.”
Hire an offensive coordinator who knows what a fullback is. Collaboration isn’t just a buzzword, coach.
Start acting like a head coach. Your job is to oversee the program. You’re so far into the offensive weeds that you can’t see the entire game.
Master the media dance, or at least fake it till you make it. In LA, perception is the only reality that matters. Today, you’re treating reporters like they’re Oklahoma fans at a USC pep rally. Flip that script, coach. In this town, a good soundbite recruits better than any assistant.
Embrace the Trojan culture and Trojan family. They are not just history; they are your secret weapon.

The Final Act: Riley’s Redemption Arc?

Here’s the thing, Trojan faithful: Lincoln Riley isn’t just some hack director stumbling onto the USC lot. He’s got the chops, the vision, and, let’s face it, the paycheck of a blockbuster auteur. With a few script rewrites – beefing up the local recruiting, hiring a run-game whisperer of an OC, and maybe taking a crash course in “How to Make Friends and Influence Media” – this show could still be a smash hit.

The trenches are on the verge of a glow-up that would make any Kardashian jealous. The talent is there; it just needs seasoning. And let’s be honest: Rome wasn’t built in a day, and neither was any dynasty worth its salt. Saban needed time. Harbaugh needed time. Hell, even Carroll didn’t turn water into wine overnight.

This is the Home vs Road record for Jones, McKay, Robinson I, Carrol, and Riley through week eight of each respective coach’s third season.

So, while Riley’s seat might be warming up faster than a convertible’s leather on a SoCal summer day, it’s not hot… yet. The potential for a USC renaissance lurking just beneath the surface like a plot twist in a Tarantino flick.

The question is: can Riley pull it all together before the credits roll? Can he merge his offensive genius with the grit and glamour of USC football? Only time will tell. But one thing’s for sure – everyone loves a good comeback story in this town. Over to you, Coach Riley. The stage is set, the cameras are rolling, and the Trojan Family awaits its happy ending.

One Last Thing: The Brisket Incident: A Meaty Metaphor

Picture this: It’s April 2021, and Lincoln Riley, the offensive mastermind, decides to show off his culinary chops. The result? A brisket so dry it could’ve been used as a coaster at the Sahara. Social media exploded faster than a USC fan’s expectations after a five-star recruit commitment.

Fast forward three years, and the internet hasn’t forgotten. That brisket has become the culinary equivalent of USC’s defensive line – tough, chewy, and leaving a bad taste in everyone’s mouth.

But here’s where the plot thickens, folks. In a twist worthy of a Tarantino flick, we’ve got a Southern California solution that could save Riley’s bacon (or in this case, his brisket):

Enter Gus’s Barbeque, the Trojan Horse of the smoked meat world.

Phone: 626-799-3251. Website link: Gus’s BBQ

It’s like the transfer portal for BBQ – ready to step in and save the day when your homegrown talent isn’t cutting it.

See, in Los Angeles, it’s not about whether you can do it yourself – it’s about knowing who to call. Riley might not be able to smoke a brisket, but if he can learn to swallow his pride and dial-up Gus’s, he might turn this meat metaphor around.

And isn’t that what USC needs right now? A coach who knows when to call an audible, when to bring in the specialists? Whether it’s BBQ or football, sometimes you need to admit you’re out of your depth and bring in the pros.

So, Coach Riley, here’s some free advice: Next time you’re thinking of firing up the grill, maybe fire up that phone instead. After all, in LA, it’s not what you know; it’s who you know who smokes the competition.

And who knows? If Riley can master this playbook – knowing when to cook it himself and when to call in the reinforcements – he might serve up a juicier season than any brisket Gus could smoke.

Now, that would be a comeback story that even Hollywood couldn’t script.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

The $87 Million Question: Hugh Freeze and Auburn’s Football Gamble

Mark Haines on October 9, 2024

Auburn University finds itself at a crossroads in the gladiatorial college football arena, where millionaire coaches pace sidelines and billion-dollar TV deals fuel an insatiable machine. The whispers have already started. The faithful readers of CoachesHotSeat.com, those amateur Nostradamuses of the gridiron, are asking the question that sends shivers down the spine of every Auburn fan: Could Hugh Freeze be fired this year?

It’s a question that isn’t just about wins and losses. It’s about cold, hard cash—$87 million of it, to be exact.

That’s the jaw-dropping sum Auburn has either already spent or might have to spend on coaching changes. $67 million shelled out since 2000 to make coaches go away, and potentially another $20 million waiting in the wings for Freeze. It’s a number that would make Wall Street blush and leave most university presidents reaching for the antacid. And now, less than two years into his tenure, Hugh Freeze might be the next name on that expensive list.

Let’s examine the situation at Auburn and see if Freeze will pack his bags before the leaves change color next fall.

The Freeze Gambit

679 days ago, Auburn rolled the dice on Hugh Freeze.

Picture this: A coach with a checkered past but an undeniable offensive mind parachuting into a program desperate to wash away the stench of the Bryan Harsin era. Freeze arrived talking a “big game”. He’d develop quarterbacks. He’d close the talent gap. He’d turn things around “fairly fast.”

Fast forward to today, and Auburn fans wonder if they’ve been sold a bill of goods.

The 2024 season has been a tire fire of epic proportions. Three home losses, including a humiliating defeat to Cal, have left the Tigers staring down the barrel of their fourth straight losing season. Bowl eligibility? That’s a pipe dream at this point.

But here’s the kicker: If Auburn wants to pull the plug on the Freeze experiment on December 1, 2024, it’ll cost them a cool $20,312,500. That’s not a typo. That’s the price of failure in the SEC.

The Quarterback Whisperer Who Lost His Voice

Freeze built his reputation on offensive fireworks and quarterback development. At Arkansas State, Ole Miss, and Liberty, his offenses lit up scoreboards like pinball machines. But at Auburn? The offense has all the potency of a wet firecracker.

Michigan State transfer Payton Thorne was supposed to be the answer. Instead, he’s become the poster child for Freeze’s struggles. Interceptions have become his love language, and Freeze’s public criticism of his signal-caller has raised eyebrows across the college football landscape.

Bo Wallace, who played under Freeze at Ole Miss, didn’t mince words: “We’re approaching the point that he’s thrown so many quarterbacks under the bus that maybe no one wants to play for him?? Don’t be a coward and blame it on kids.”

Ouch.

The $87 Million Elephant in the Room

Now, let’s talk about that $87 million. Since 2000, Auburn has burned through coaches like a teenager with their first credit card. Tommy Tuberville, Gene Chizik, Gus Malzahn, Bryan Harsin – each departure came with a price tag that would make most Fortune 500 companies blush. And if Freeze joins this not-so-illustrious club, the total bill will hit a staggering $87 million.

It’s a number that begs the question: What could Auburn have done with that money instead? How many academic scholarships could it have funded? How many state-of-the-art facilities could it have built? Hell, how many Cam Newtons could it have bought? (That’s a joke, NCAA. Please don’t investigate.)

But here’s the rub: In the arms race that is college football, Auburn isn’t alone. Texas A&M, another SEC school with more money than sense, has reportedly spent nearly $95 million on coaching buyouts in the same timeframe.

It’s madness. But it’s the madness that defines modern college football.

The Recruiting Paradox

Here’s where things get weird. Freeze and his staff are crushing it on the recruiting trail despite the on-field dumpster fire. Auburn’s 2025 class is ranked 3rd nationally. The 2026 class? It’s sitting pretty at 2nd.

It’s like watching a magician pull rabbits out of a hat while the theater burns down around him. Impressive? Sure. But also a little beside the point.

The $20 Million Question

So here we are. Auburn is staring down the barrel of another lost season. They’ve got a coach who can’t seem to develop quarterbacks or win games but can convince 17-year-olds that Auburn is the place to be. They’re facing a potential $20 million buyout for a coach less than two years into his tenure.

What’s a tiger to do?

The coming weeks will be crucial. Games against Oklahoma, Missouri, and the Death Star, which is Alabama, loom large. If Freeze can engineer a miracle turnaround, he might buy himself more time. If not? Well, Auburn might find itself reaching for the checkbook once again.

Whatever happens, one thing is clear: The situation at Auburn is a perfect microcosm of the beautiful, maddening, financially irresponsible world of college football. It’s a world where the pressure to win trumps all, fiscal responsibility is an afterthought, and the next big payday is always just one coaching change away.

As for Hugh Freeze and Auburn? They’re just along for the ride, hoping they can get off before the bill comes due.

What do you think? Should Auburn stick with Freeze?

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

The Hot Seat Burns: Purdue Parts Ways with Graham Harrell Amidst Offensive Struggles

Mark Haines on September 30, 2024

In the high-stakes college football world, where every play counts and every game matters, the pressure cooker environment can sometimes boil over. And in West Lafayette, Indiana, the temperature had been rising steadily.

The Fall From Grace

Just four games into the 2024 season, Purdue’s offensive coordinator, Graham Harrell, found himself out of a job. The Boilermakers, sitting at a disappointing 1-3 record following a lackluster 28-10 loss to Nebraska, decided a change was needed.

Head coach Ryan Walters, in a move that surprised many, pulled the trigger on Harrell’s dismissal, stating, “Decisions like this are never easy. After evaluating our start to the season, I felt that it was best for our team to make a change now. We are appreciative of Graham’s contributions to our program and wish him the best going forward.”

It’s the kind of moment that sends shockwaves through the locker room, a stark reminder that no one’s position is truly secure in this game.

The Offense Sputters

The numbers painted a grim picture of Purdue’s offensive woes. Against Nebraska, they went nearly four quarters without scoring, their ground game managed a paltry 50 yards, and quarterback Hudson Card struggled to find his rhythm. It was the second time the Boilermakers failed to reach 100 yards rushing this season, a statistic that would make any offensive coordinator cringe.

In football, where points are king, such performances are unacceptable.

A Year of Unfulfilled Promise

Harrell’s tenure at Purdue had been marked by inconsistency. While the Boilermakers averaged a respectable 23.9 points per game in 2023, his first year at the helm, their passing game lagged, and they struggled to put up big numbers against conference opponents.

It’s the classic story of a coach who shows flashes of brilliance but ultimately fails to deliver on the high expectations placed upon him.

The Search for a Spark

The Search For A Spark

Now, Purdue finds itself at a crossroads. With Harrell gone, the search begins for a new offensive coordinator, someone who can ignite the spark that has been missing. It’s a pivotal moment for the Boilermakers, a chance to turn their season around and salvage something from the ashes of their early struggles.

Change is inevitable in the ever-evolving landscape of college football. Sometimes, it’s the catalyst for greatness; other times, it’s simply a necessary step in the journey. Only time will tell which path Purdue will take.

The Coaching Carousel Turns

As the coaching carousel spins, Graham Harrell’s name joins the list of those seeking a new opportunity. His resume, which includes stints at USC and West Virginia, speaks to his potential, but questions remain about his ability to produce results consistently.

The hot seat is always waiting, a constant reminder that the margin for error is slim in this game. For Harrell, it’s a chance to reflect, regroup, and prepare for the next chapter in his coaching career.

And for Purdue, it’s a new beginning, a fresh start, and a chance to rewrite the narrative of their season. The game goes on, and the pursuit of victory continues.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

What We’re Watchin Saturday – Week 4 Edition

Mark Haines on September 20, 2024

Preview of Six Marquee Matchups & Full Viewer Guide

Week 4 in college football isn’t just another Saturday on the calendar. It’s a crucible, a proving ground where pretenders are unmasked, and contenders emerge bloodied but unbowed.

Picture this: Twenty-two young men, their futures hanging in the balance, lined up on a field about to become their battleground. The air crackles with tension. In the stands, thousands hold their breath, their hopes and fears palpable.

This weekend, we’re in for a feast of gridiron drama. Six marquee matchups pit the Top 25 teams against each other in conference showdowns that could reshape the season’s landscape. The anticipation is palpable. These aren’t just games; they’re narrative-defining moments, each with the potential to launch or derail championship dreams.

But here’s the kicker: It’s not just about the rankings. It’s about the stories unfolding on that field—the quarterback fighting for redemption after last week’s crushing interception. The underdog team, written off by pundits, hungry to prove the world wrong. The coach on the hot seat, his career potentially riding on the next four quarters. These are the personal struggles that make college football so compelling.

As we enter Week 4, remember that every snap, decision, and moment of glory or failure in college football isn’t just changing the scoreboard. It’s changing lives.

So, which battles will define this weekend? Which teams will rise to the occasion, and which will crumble under huge expectations? The unpredictability of college football makes it so thrilling—strap in, folks. We’re about to find out.

Early Games

Kansas @ West Virginia: The Big 12’s Wounded Warriors

Game Time: Noon Eastern, 9:00 AM Pacific

Television: ESPN 2

Announcers: Brian Custer, Rod Gilmore

Two teams, not just 1-2, but 1-2 with asterisks. Kansas and West Virginia aren’t just limping into conference play; they’re stalking, licking wounds that are still raw, still stinging.

The Jayhawks? They’ve tasted defeat by the slimmest of margins. Two games, six points. That’s not a losing streak; that’s a tightrope walk gone wrong. Twice. Against Illinois and UNLV, Kansas didn’t just lose; they glimpsed victory and felt its warmth, only to have it snatched away at the last second.

And West Virginia? They’ve been through the gauntlet. A season opener against Penn State that felt like climbing Everest in flip-flops. Then, a gut-wrenching loss to Pitt, their rival, in a game that wasn’t just about football but about state pride.

These aren’t just 1-2 teams. These are 1-2 teams with chips on their shoulders the size of Mount Rushmore.

In the Big 12, where chaos reigns supreme, these wounded warriors aren’t seeking sympathy. They’re looking for blood. Their recent history isn’t a burden; it’s rocket fuel.

Think about it. In a conference where today’s underdog is tomorrow’s champion, who’s more dangerous than a team with something to prove? Kansas and West Virginia aren’t just playing for a win. They’re playing for redemption, validation, and the right to say, “Those first three games? That wasn’t us. THIS is us.”

This isn’t just a game. It’s a resurrection in cleats. Two battered but unbroken teams have a chance to rewrite their season’s narrative in bold, unmistakable strokes.

Who’s going to seize this moment? The team that doesn’t just play with desperation but with a cold, calculated hunger that turns near-misses into bull’s-eyes.

Afternoon Games

No. 11 USC @ No. 18 Michigan: When Titans Collide

Game Time: 3:30 PM Eastern, 12:30 PM Pacific

Television: CBS

Announcers: Brad Nessler, Gary Danielson

Two college football behemoths, their histories intertwined like ancient oaks, suddenly uprooted and replanted in the same forest. USC and Michigan. The very names evoke images of packed Rose Bowls, crisp January air filled with the clash of cardinal and maize.

But this isn’t January. This is September, and the landscape has shifted seismically.

Conference realignment. Two words that sound bureaucratic but hit like a linebacker. Suddenly, these West Coast-Midwest battles aren’t just for roses anymore. They’re for survival in the new Big Ten jungle.

Let’s break it down:

USC and Michigan have danced this dance before, but always with an air of novelty. Six-four in the Trojans’ favor, their meetings as rare and anticipated as solar eclipses. Now? They’re conference rivals. The novelty’s gone, replaced by naked necessity.

Michigan, the defending national champions, is stumbling like a punch-drunk boxer. The exodus of talent and coaches has left them vulnerable and exposed. That Texas game? It wasn’t just a loss. It was a public undressing, a harsh reminder that yesterday’s glory doesn’t guarantee today’s victory.

USC? They’re the new kid on the block with a chip on their shoulder the size of the Hollywood sign. That Week 1 takedown of LSU wasn’t just a win but a statement. “We’re not here to participate,” they screamed without words. “We’re here to dominate.”

Now, these two programs collide in Ann Arbor. It’s not just a game. It’s a clash of cultures, histories, and expectations. Michigan is fighting to prove it’s not yesterday’s news, and USC is eager to show it’s tomorrow’s headlines.

This isn’t just about football. It’s about adaptation. It’s about two storied programs that realize that history is just a prologue in this new world. The real story? It’s being written right now, with every snap, every tackle, every touchdown.

Who emerges victorious? The team that doesn’t just play the game but rewrites the rules of engagement. The team that looks at this brave new world of college football and doesn’t just adapt but thrives.

This isn’t just a game. It’s a glimpse into the future of college football.

Memphis vs. Navy: The AAC’s Unlikely Showdown

Game Time: 3:30 PM Eastern, 12:30 PM Pacific

Network: CBSSN

Announcers: Carter Blackburn, Randy Cross

Two undefeated teams, each with a story that reads like a Hollywood script, colliding in a conference battle that could redefine the AAC landscape. This clash of narratives is so compelling that you’d think it was fiction if you weren’t watching it unfold in real-time.

Memphis. The Tigers. Last week, they waltzed into Tallahassee and did the unthinkable. They didn’t just beat Florida State; they shattered the Seminoles’ world. It wasn’t an upset; it was a heist. They stole more than a win; they stole the nation’s attention.

And Navy? They’re not just winning; they’re annihilating. 43.5 points per game. That’s not an offense; that’s a natural disaster. The Midshipmen aren’t just beating teams; they’re leaving scorch marks on the scoreboard.

But here’s where it gets interesting:

Memphis isn’t just winning; it’s pickpocketing. It is tenth in the nation in turnovers gained. They don’t just defend; they hunt. Every snap is an opportunity, every loose ball a treasure.

For Navy, the equation is simple but brutal: Protect the ball, or watch your undefeated dream sink faster than a submarine with screen doors.

This isn’t just a game of football. It’s a game of keep-away, played at the highest stakes. Navy’s offense, a force of nature, against Memphis’s defense, a pack of hungry wolves. Something’s got to give.

Who comes out on top? The team that doesn’t just play their game but dictates the terms of engagement. Navy needs to hold onto the ball like it’s the last lifeboat on a sinking ship. Memphis? They must turn the field into a minefield, where every step Navy takes could be their last.

This is more than an AAC battle. It’s a collision of momentum, a test of wills. Memphis is riding the high of a historic upset, and Navy is surfing a tidal wave of offensive dominance.

This game isn’t just a contest in the AAC, where chaos is the only constant. It’s a potential turning point in the conference narrative.

No. 12 Utah @ No. 14 Oklahoma State: The Big 12’s Geriatric Showdown

Boone Pickens statue in front of Boone Pickens Stadium, home of Oklahoma State University Football in Stillwater, OK

Game Time: 4:00 PM Eastern, 1:00 PM Pacific

Network: Fox

Announcers: Jason Benetti, Brock Huard

Two quarterbacks are so seasoned they could teach college courses instead of taking snaps. Cam Rising and Alan Bowman have a combined 49 years of life experience and 14 years of college eligibility. This isn’t just a football game; it’s a clash of football’s Benjamin Buttons.

In this game – age isn’t just a number—it’s a weapon.

Utah and Oklahoma State. Two teams, both 3-0, both eyeing the Big 12 crown like it’s the last slice of pizza at a frat party. But this isn’t just about undefeated records or conference standings. This is about two quarterbacks who’ve seen more college football than some coaches.

Let’s break it down:

Cam Rising, 25, Utah’s prodigal son. He’s seen more comebacks than Rocky Balboa, including his return from injury last week. Rising isn’t just playing quarterback; he’s conducting a master class in resilience.

Alan Bowman, 24, Oklahoma State’s gunslinger. He’s changed schools more times than some people change their oil. But in Stillwater, he’s found his home, rhythm, and swagger.

This isn’t just a quarterback duel. It’s a battle of football sages, two players who’ve forgotten more about college football than most have learned.

But here’s the kicker: This game isn’t just about the quarterbacks. It’s about Utah, the new kid on the Big 12 block, walking into Stillwater like it’s high noon at the OK Corral. It’s about Oklahoma State defending its turf with the ferocity of a junkyard dog.

The question isn’t just who wins. It’s how Utah handles the pressure cooker that is Boone Pickens Stadium. It’s whether Oklahoma State can leverage home-field advantage into a statement win.

This game is a litmus test for both teams’ Big 12 title aspirations. It’s a chance for Rising to cement his legacy and for Bowman to prove he’s found his true home.

Who comes out on top? The team that doesn’t just play the game but owns the moment. The quarterback who doesn’t just read the defense but reads the damn future.

Welcome to Big 12 football in 2024, where the quarterbacks are older than some of the playbooks, and every game is a potential season-definer.

Evening Games

No. 8 Miami @ South Florida: The Hurricane Meets Its Storm Chaser

Tampa, FL, USA - May 28, 2024: The Lee Roy Selmon Athletics Center at the University of South Florida is a 104,000 sq ft athletic facility for most of the schools athletic teams.

Game Time: 7:00 PM Eastern, 4:00 PM Pacific

Network: ESPN

Announcers: Bob Wischusen, Louis Riddick

Quarterback Cam Ward is rewriting the Miami playbook faster than South Beach nightclubs change their VIP lists. Three games in, he’s not just leading the Hurricanes; he’s conducting a symphony of pigskin destruction with the entire nation tuning in.

The U isn’t just back—it’s evolved.

But hold on to your Cuban sandwiches because this story will take a sharp turn onto I-75 towards Tampa.

South Florida. The Bulls. On paper, they’re David to Miami’s Goliath. But here’s the twist: This David’s been practicing his slingshot on the likes of Alabama. Yeah, that Alabama. The Crimson Tide barely escaped Tampa with their pride intact, let alone a comfortable win.

Let’s break it down:

Cam Ward isn’t just good; he’s video-game-with-cheat-codes good. Leading the nation in touchdown passes? Check. Second in passing yards? Double-check. He’s not just padding stats; he’s redefining what it means to be a Miami quarterback.

But South Florida? They’re not here to admire Ward’s stats. They’re 8th in the country in turnovers forced per game. That’s a wrecking crew with a taste for quarterback dreams.

This is a litmus test. Miami’s been feasting on cupcakes (sorry, Florida), but South Florida? They’re serving up a full-course meal of reality.

The question isn’t just whether Miami can win. It’s whether they can prove they belong in the national conversation. It’s whether Cam Ward can translate his video game numbers into real-world domination when the stakes are higher than a Tampa high-rise.

And South Florida? They’re not just playing for a win. They’re playing for respect, recognition, and the right to say they’re more than just “that team that almost beat Bama.”

Who comes out on top? The team that doesn’t just play the game but defines it. The team that looks at the narrative everyone’s written and says, “Nah, we’ve got a better story to tell.”

This contest is where the underdogs bite as hard as the favorites, and reputations are made and broken faster than you can say “Go Bulls” or “It’s all about the U.”

California @ Florida State: When the Football Gods Play Opposite Day

July 13, 2019 Berkeley / CA / USA - Golden Bear Statue on UC Berkeley campus, symbol of UC Berkeley and its athletic teams, the California Golden Bears; the Campanile (Sather Tower) in the background

Game Time: 7:00 PM Eastern, 4:00 PM Pacific

Network: ESPN2

Announcers: Roy Philpott, Sam Acho

Picture this: A world where California is undefeated, Florida State can’t buy a win, and the ACC stretches from sea to shining sea. Welcome to college football in 2024, where reality has gone off the rails faster than a runaway locomotive.

Florida State, oh, how the mighty have fallen. Three games, three losses. The Seminoles aren’t just struggling; they’re redefining what it means to underperform. It’s like watching a Ferrari compete in a demolition derby – all that potential, reduced to a smoking heap of missed opportunities and shattered expectations.

And California? The Golden Bears are undefeated, strutting into Tallahassee like they own the place. It’s a Cinderella story so improbable that even Disney writers would call it far-fetched.

Let’s break it down:

Florida State isn’t just losing; they’re inventing new ways to disappoint. It’s as if they’re allergic to the end zone, afraid of tackling, and convinced that winning is overrated. The Seminoles have gone from feared predators to bewildered prey faster than you can say “tomahawk chop.”

California, meanwhile, is living proof that sometimes, the universe has a sense of humor. Undefeated? In the ACC? It’s like watching a surfer catch a wave in the Sahara.

But here’s the kicker: Cal fans, bless their hearts, aren’t celebrating. They’re waiting for the other cleat to drop. They’ve seen this movie before and know their team has a PhD in snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. It’s not paranoia if they’re out to lose, right?

This isn’t just a game. It’s a cosmic joke, a gridiron twilight zone where up is down, west is east, and California is teaching Florida how to play football.

Who comes out on top? The team that embraces the absurdity. Florida State must remember they’re Florida State, for crying out loud. And Cal? They need to forget every heartbreaking loss and every near-miss and play like they’ve got nothing to lose – because, let’s face it, they don’t.

The stage is set in Tallahassee, where the palm trees are confused, the football gods are laughing, and we’re all witnesses to what happens when college football goes through the looking glass.

No. 6 Tennessee @ No. 15 Oklahoma: When Titans Collide and History Comes Full Circle

NCAA Football 2013: Iowa State vs. Oklahoma NOV 16

Game Time: 7:30 PM Eastern, 4:30 PM Pacific

Network: ABC

Announcers: Chris Fowler, Kirk Herbstreit

Two college football behemoths, their histories as rich as oil fields, are colliding in a game that’s more than just a battle for victory— it’s a seismic shift in the sport’s landscape. Welcome to Norman, Oklahoma, where the ghosts of the gridiron past are about to witness a glimpse into football’s future.

Tennessee vs. Oklahoma. It’s not just a game; it’s a time machine, a crystal ball, and a revenge plot all rolled into one.

Let’s break it down:

Tennessee rolls into Norman like a runaway freight train, hauling the nation’s top-ranked scoring offense and a defense stingier than a depression-era banker. They’re not just winning games; they’re redefining dominance.

Oklahoma? They’re the home team with a chip on their shoulder the size of the Sooner Schooner. Three wins in four meetings against the Vols? That’s not history; that’s a challenge.

But here’s where it gets juicy:

Tennessee’s head coach, Josh Heupel, isn’t just returning to Oklahoma. He’s coming home. This is the prodigal son story, but with a twist sharper than a Oklahoma tornado. Heupel, the quarterback who brought glory to Norman, the offensive coordinator unceremoniously shown the door. Now he’s back, not as a penitent but a conqueror.

And the quarterbacks? Nico Iamaleava and Jackson Arnold. These aren’t ordinary players; they’re glimpses into the future of college football. Young guns with rocket arms and dreams bigger than the Oklahoma sky.

This isn’t just a game. It’s a collision of narratives that is so rich that Shakespeare would be taking notes.

Who comes out on top? The team that doesn’t just play the game but rewrites the script. Tennessee is looking to prove they’re not just SEC royalty, but national throne contenders—Oklahoma, defending their turf and their legacy against the ghosts of their past.

The stage is set. Norman, Oklahoma—where history and future collide with the force of a thousand touchdowns. In one corner, Tennessee’s offensive juggernaut. On the other, Oklahoma’s home-field mystique. And circling it all, Josh Heupel’s return to the place that made him and then unmade him.

Week 4 Schedule & Viewer Guide

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

Why Riley & Day Are Poised to Shatter Expectations (Or Crash and Burn)

Mark Haines on August 28, 2024

The Coaches on the (Supposed) Hot Seat: Lincoln Riley and Ryan Day
The college football season hasn’t started, and the “hot seat” talk is already in full swing. Pundits and fans are sharpening their pitchforks, ready to skew any coach who doesn’t deliver immediate, flawless results. Lincoln Riley at USC and Ryan Day at Ohio State are two names that keep popping up. Let’s examine whether these coaches genuinely feel the heat or it’s just the usual preseason hype.

Lincoln Riley: The USC Savior or a Trojan Horse?
On the surface, it seems absurd to suggest Lincoln Riley is on the hot seat. He led USC to a Pac-12 Championship appearance and coached Caleb Williams to a Heisman Trophy in his first season. But the Trojans stumbled to an 8-5 record in 2023. While still potent with Williams at the helm, the defense was a sieve, and the offense couldn’t overcome the defensive woes. The sting of losses to Notre Dame and UCLA still lingers (how do you not have your team “hyped” to play your two biggest rivals?), and some question whether Riley is the right man for the job.

So, is Riley’s seat hot?
Not really. Let’s be honest; he inherited a program in shambles. Rebuilding takes time, and Riley has made significant progress. The move to the Big Ten is a new ballgame, and he deserves a chance to adapt. His track record speaks for itself – the man knows how to develop quarterbacks and attract top talent. USC’s administration didn’t shell out millions for a quick fix; they’re invested in Riley’s long-term vision.

But, there’s always a ‘but’…

Winning cures all. Riley’s current winning percentage is .704, barely above the acceptable USC minimum of .691(calculated by Coaches Hot Seat.)
USC isn’t just about winning; it’s about tradition. Riley needs to embrace the legacy of coaches like Jones, McKay, Robinson, and Carroll. They set the standard at USC.
Recruiting matters. Southern California is a goldmine of talent. Riley must focus on locking down the local kids, not chasing pipe dreams nationwide.
The Notre Dame rivalry is sacred. Riley’s talk of ditching it and being “more like Alabama” is blasphemy to Trojan fans. USC has its own unique identity, and Riley needs to respect that.
• It’s the little things, too. Assigning jersey numbers with history, opening up to the media, and stop whining about the schedule. Act like you’re a $10 million coach at USC.

Ryan Day: The Buckeye Burden
Ryan Day’s resume at Ohio State is stellar: a 55-8 record and two Big Ten championships. But those three consecutive losses to Michigan? They’re a scarlet letter on his otherwise impressive tenure. The Buckeye faithful crave dominance, especially against their arch-nemesis. The pressure to beat Michigan and win a national championship is immense.

Is Day’s job in jeopardy?
Not yet. He’s consistently delivered success, and the team is primed for another strong season. The expanded College Football Playoff gives them more chances to contend for a title, even if they slip up against Michigan. Day’s track record and the program’s strength suggest he’s not on the hot seat…yet.

But the pressure is mounting…

Losing to Michigan again would be catastrophic. It’s not just about the rivalry; it’s about maintaining the program’s aura of invincibility.
Missing the playoffs, even with the expanded format, would be a major letdown after a hyped offseason.
A blowout loss in a big game could raise questions about Day’s leadership and ability to make adjustments.
Any signs of player discontent or locker room issues could snowball into a full-blown crisis.
A significant decline in performance, with multiple losses and a lack of competitiveness, could seal Day’s fate.

The Bottom Line
Both Riley and Day are under the microscope. But for now, their seats are lukewarm at best. They have the talent, the resources, and the support to turn things around. The 2024 season will be a defining one for both coaches. Will they rise to the occasion, or will the hot seat rumors become a self-fulfilling prophecy? Only time will tell.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE

Blog Article

Comcast’s Big Ten Blackout: A Major Fumble on the Goal Line

Mark Haines on August 27, 2024

We’ve got a real head-scratcher on our hands, courtesy of Comcast Xfinity and their handling of the Big Ten Network’s new additions.

John Canzano over at the Bald Faced Truth Newsletter has been digging into this, and it’s not pretty.
The Bottom Line: Comcast is blacking out Big Ten Network games featuring Oregon, Washington, UCLA, and USC. Yes, you read that right. The very schools that jumped ship from the Pac-12, partly for better TV distribution, are now facing blackouts in their inaugural Big Ten season.

The Fumble: Comcast and the Big Ten Network are at odds over whether live games should be part of the basic cable package or require an upgraded sports tier. Comcast wants that extra $10 a month. The Big Ten Network? Not so much.

The Fallout: Fans are understandably furious. Many shelled out the extra cash based on Comcast’s assurances, only to find live games are MIA. We’re talking football, soccer, volleyball – the whole shebang.

The Bigger Picture: This isn’t just about a few missed games. It’s about broken promises, poor communication, and a major fumble on Comcast’s part. Remember those Pac-12 distribution woes that haunted fans for years? Yeah, this feels a bit like déjà vu.

The Silver Lining: Other providers like Hulu, YouTube TV, etc., aren’t having any issues. So, if you’re fed up with Comcast’s shenanigans, you’ve got options.

The Takeaway: Comcast needs to get its act together. Fast. This isn’t how you welcome new teams and their fans to the Big Ten family. Let’s hope they resolve this mess before the first football games kick off. Otherwise, they risk alienating a massive chunk of their customer base.

Stay tuned: We’ll keep you updated on this developing story. In the meantime, let’s hope Comcast sees the light and does right by its customers.

B1G Ten Network Access Issues

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE