Joe Moorhead Was Supposed To Fix Akron Football. Instead, He’s Turned Statistical Improvement Into An Art Form Of Losing

The math doesn’t lie at Akron.

Three seasons into his tenure at Akron, the veteran coach sits on college football’s third-hottest seat with a 0.659 Hot Seat Rating™ in the Coaches Hot Seat® rankings. This number reflects significant underperformance against expectations, where 1.0 represents meeting expectations and anything below signals mounting pressure. His 8-28 record tells the story of a program trapped between statistical improvement and actual wins, a cruel mathematical reality that has defined his existence in Ohio.

The numbers reveal a stunning contradiction: a supposed offensive mastermind who can’t win games.

The Statistical Paradox That Defines Frustration

Moorhead’s three-year journey at Akron reads like a case study in how progress doesn’t always equal success.

2022 Season Reality:

  • Record: 2-10
  • Offense: 21.6 points per game
  • Defense: 33.5 points allowed per game
  • The diagnosis: An offense with potential, destroyed by defensive incompetence

2023 Season Nightmare:

  • Record: 2-10 (again)
  • Offense: 16.3 points per game (brutal regression)
  • Defense: 28.0 points allowed per game (solid improvement)
  • The diagnosis: Fixed defense, broken offense—same losing result

2024 Season Mockery:

  • Record: 4-8 (modest improvement)
  • Offense: 20.4 points per game (rebound)
  • Defense: 32.0 points allowed per game (regression)
  • The diagnosis: One step forward, one step back, still losing

Here’s what makes this maddening: Moorhead himself admits they’ve had “10 one-score losses in two years, including five by a field goal or less and four of those in overtime.”

These aren’t blowouts suggesting systemic failure.

These are heartbreaking defeats that reveal a program tantalizingly close to competence but consistently unable to cross the finish line.

When Statistics Lie: The Buffalo Game That Broke Everyone’s Brain

Last season’s 41-30 loss to Buffalo perfectly encapsulated Akron’s mathematical impossibility.

The numbers that should have meant victory:

  • Akron outgained Buffalo 452-390 total yards
  • Dominated through the air 378-210 in passing yards
  • Won the third-down battle 43% to 23%
  • Ben Finley threw for 378 yards and four touchdowns

The reality that happened: Buffalo spotted a 38-7 lead before Akron remembered how to play football.

When your quarterback throws for 378 yards and four touchdowns but you still lose by double digits, the problem isn’t talent—it’s execution, culture, and coaching.

Individual Brilliance Wasted by Collective Incompetence

The 2024 roster showcased exactly the kind of talent that should translate to wins.

Offensive weapons that should have dominated:

  • Adrian Norton: 831 receiving yards, 19.3 yards per catch, 7 touchdowns
  • Ben Finley: 2,604 passing yards, 16 touchdowns over 12 games
  • Jordon Simmons: 664 rushing yards on 6.0 yards per carry
  • Garrison Smith: 81.3% field goal accuracy

The coaching failure: When you have explosive playmakers at every skill position and a reliable kicker, yet still struggle to win games, the responsibility falls squarely on scheme execution and leadership.

These individual performances should have combined to create a winning formula.

Instead, they highlighted the coaching staff’s inability to synthesize talent into consistent team success.

The Defensive Regression That Destroyed Progress

Here’s where Moorhead’s tenure becomes truly damning.

After limiting opponents to 335.0 yards per game in 2023, the 2024 defense collapsed to allowing 414.4 yards per contest—nearly returning to the abysmal 2022 levels.

The regression wasn’t subtle:

  • Pass defense: Opponents completed 64.4% (up from 55.9% in 2023)
  • Run defense: Allowed 183.3 yards per game on 4.6 yards per carry
  • Takeaways: Just 7 interceptions and 9 fumble recoveries in 12 games
  • Turnover rate: 1.3 per game (pathetic for modern college football)

In a sport where possessions are precious, this defensive inability to create turnovers severely limited Akron’s margin for error.

The 2025 Roster Overhaul: Desperation or Smart Strategy?

Understanding the pressure he faces, Moorhead has aggressively addressed roster deficiencies.

Defensive reinforcements:

  • Over 10 new defensive linemen
  • Multiple linebacker additions
  • Several players exceeding 290 pounds
  • New cornerbacks and safeties for improved coverage

Offensive upgrades:

  • Multiple running backs over 205 pounds
  • Offensive line featuring players over 300 pounds
  • Reduced dependence on individual playmakers
  • Better short-yardage reliability

The critical question: Will these roster upgrades translate to actual wins, or just better statistics in losing efforts?

Schedule Reality: Opportunity and Pitfalls

The 2025 schedule presents both hope and danger.

Non-conference games:

  • Wyoming (winnable)
  • Nebraska (measuring stick against Power Five)
  • UAB (should win)
  • Duquesne (must win)

MAC schedule challenges:

  • Eight conference games, including Toledo and Central Michigan
  • Potentially favorable matchups against UMass and Kent State
  • More home games late in the season

The pressure point: If Akron stumbles in winnable non-conference games or struggles early in MAC play, the familiar pattern of close losses and moral victories could quickly resurrect coaching change discussions.

The Cultural Problem That Statistics Can’t Fix

The psychological burden of consistent losing has infected this program’s DNA.

When players and coaches expect close games to slip away in the fourth quarter, those expectations often become reality. Breaking this cycle requires more than tactical adjustments—it demands a complete cultural shift that validates belief in eventual success.

Moorhead’s track record suggests understanding:

  • Previous championship experience at multiple stops
  • Background as an offensive innovator
  • History of developing NFL-caliber talent

The concerning pattern: His previous head coaching stint at Mississippi State ended in frustration despite superior talent, raising questions about his ability to maintain program culture over extended periods.

Make-or-Break Mathematics

The 2025 season represents Moorhead’s final realistic opportunity to demonstrate sustained improvement.

The brutal math:

  • Overall FBS head coaching record: 22-40
  • Akron record: 8-28 over three seasons
  • Hot seat rating: 0.659 (third-hottest in FBS)
  • Winning percentage: .222

The irony: Moorhead was supposed to be the sure thing—the experienced head coach, the familiar face, the proven winner. Instead, he’s become living proof that coordinating success and leading it are entirely different skills.

Another disappointing campaign would likely end his tenure and potentially damage his reputation as a coordinator candidate.

Bottom Line: Incremental Progress Isn’t Enough

Akron’s 2025 season will be defined by whether Moorhead can finally convert statistical improvement and individual talent into actual victories.

The roster upgrades provide tools for success.

The schedule offers winnable opportunities.

The pressure demands immediate results.

The simple equation: With a 0.659 hot seat rating and his track record at Akron, Moorhead needs wins—not moral victories, not improved statistics, but actual wins that demonstrate tangible program advancement.

For a program that has managed just 8 victories in 36 games under his leadership, 2025 represents far more than another season of development.

It’s the final calculation in determining whether Joe Moorhead can solve Akron’s perpetual problem of underachievement, or whether his tenure will become another cautionary tale about the difference between coordinating brilliance and leading it.

Want to know which other “under the radar” coaches are about to be on the hot seat?

I track the real hot seats (not just the obvious ones) every Friday in my free newsletter.

Join thousands of readers who get the stories before they become headlines: Coaches Hot Seat Insider.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Week 3 Coaches Hot Seat Rankings: Who’s Feeling the Burn and Who’s About to Get Torched?

1. Billy Napier – Florida

A High-Stakes Balancing Act

Billy Napier’s time in Gainesville is fast becoming a cautionary tale of what happens when a promising coaching hire collides head-on with the unforgiving realities of SEC football. After two-plus seasons at the helm of the Florida Gators, Napier has not only failed to ignite the fire fans had hoped for but also finds himself doused in a cold bath of doubt and second-guessing. His record? A tepid 11-15. His latest chapter? A 6-game losing skid that reads like a death spiral, punctuated by 11 losses in his last 14 outings against Power 5 competition.

Where Things Stand Now: A Program on the Brink

Napier’s Gators opened this season with a 41-17 faceplant against Miami—a performance with the Florida faithful clutching their pearls and boosters reaching for their checkbooks, not to invest but to buy out. The offense, lacking punch and rhythm, seems less like a coordinated attack and more like a jazz improvisation gone wrong. Meanwhile, the defense has been shredded with the kind of ease that has rivals circling like sharks in a tide of blood. And as if that weren’t enough, Nick Saban, the Oracle of Tuscaloosa, took a not-so-subtle jab at the program’s culture, suggesting it’s not up to SEC standards. When the godfather of college football speaks, the echo reverberates across the conference.

To add to Napier’s woes, he’s staring down the barrel of what many are calling the most challenging schedule in school history. No team in the country—not even a powerhouse like Florida—gets to skate by on mediocrity when the SEC gauntlet is loaded with landmines from top to bottom.

Pressure Cookers and Powder Kegs: Why Napier is Running Out of Time

If you’re a head coach at Florida, you’re not just managing a football team—you’re handling the emotional volatility of an entire state. And right now, the fanbase and boosters are running out of patience. Their expectations were sky-high when Napier arrived, believing he was the tactical mind who could return the Gators to glory. Instead, they’ve got a team that looks like it’s sleepwalking through the SEC. Add a string of early-season firings across college football and the precedent is set: no one is safe, not even in September.

But firing a coach isn’t as simple as pulling the plug. There’s the small matter of Napier’s buyout—an eye-watering $25 million if he’s let go this season. That’s the financial anchor that can keep even the hottest seats from spontaneously combusting. Plus, Florida’s historical tendency has been to at least give their head coaches until October.

The Road Ahead: A Future That Could Be Written in Weeks, Not Months

So, where does this leave Billy Napier? At a precipice, with both feet teetering over the edge. The next few weeks will be defining. You’d think last week’s win against Samford offered a brief reprieve, a momentary gasp of air, but it didn’t. A string of losses in SEC play could transform simmering discontent into outright mutiny. And at Florida, once the tide of booster sentiment turns, it can be impossible to turn back. The stakes? Enormous. The margin for error? Nonexistent. Napier isn’t just coaching for his job—he’s fighting to keep Florida from becoming another cautionary tale of how quickly things can fall apart in the unforgiving world of college football.

2. Sam Pittman – Arkansas

Arkansas: A Program Teetering on the Edge

For Sam Pittman, the head coach at Arkansas, the honeymoon phase has long since ended, and the stark reality of life in the SEC West has settled in. Coming off a nail-biting double-overtime loss to #16 Oklahoma State, 39-31, Pittman finds himself in a precarious position—caught between the promise of potential and the pressure of unmet expectations. And in Fayetteville, patience is not a virtue; it’s a fleeting luxury.

The Brutal Math of Close Games: A Coach’s Nightmare

Pittman’s record in close games tells the tale of a team that can’t seem to get out of its own way. Over the last two-plus seasons, the Razorbacks are a dismal 3-10 in games decided by seven points or less. That’s more than just bad luck; it’s a pattern. And patterns, especially the losing kind, have a way of becoming narratives that are hard to shake.

Mistakes, it seems, have been Pittman’s constant companion. Turnovers, penalties, and missed field goals are like recurring nightmares that the Razorbacks can’t wake up from. Even when the team shows flashes of brilliance, they stumble at the finish line. There’s a sense that they can compete, but when the clock’s winding down and the game’s on the line, they lack the killer instinct to close the deal.

Mounting Pressure: A Fanbase Running Out of Patience

There’s nothing like a season of self-inflicted wounds to turn up the heat on a head coach. After a disappointing 2023 campaign, Razorback fans are growing restless. They’re not just frustrated—they’re questioning whether Pittman can be the guy to lead this program back to relevance in a brutal SEC West. The expectations for 2024 were clear: show improvement, deliver wins, and reignite a fanbase that’s lost its spark. Anything short of that, and the whispers of discontent will grow into full-throated calls for change.

Pittman knows he’s not just coaching for his job—he’s managing a precarious balancing act between keeping fans engaged and maintaining the critical support of donors. Wins generate excitement, and excitement brings in money. Without either, the financial foundation of a program can start to look shaky.

Reasons for Hope? A Few Bright Spots Amid the Clouds

Still, it’s not all doom and gloom on The Hill. The Razorbacks showed fight in their double-overtime loss to a strong Oklahoma State team—enough to suggest that there’s some bite left in this squad. The schedule ahead also offers a glimmer of hope, with winnable games against UAB, Auburn, and Texas A&M. These matchups represent more than just potential wins; they’re lifelines for a coach whose seat is getting warmer by the week.

There’s also been a significant overhaul on the offensive side of the coaching staff, a move that signals Pittman is willing to make changes to right the ship. But in the cutthroat world of college football, especially in the SEC, moral victories and coaching shakeups only buy so much time. At some point, it comes down to one simple thing: winning.

The Weeks Ahead: Crunch Time for Pittman in Fayetteville

As it stands, Sam Pittman’s seat isn’t just warm—it’s on the verge of catching fire. The UAB game looms large, not just as a must-win but as a critical turning point for a season and, potentially, a tenure. Following that, the Razorbacks enter a gauntlet of SEC matchups against Auburn and Texas A&M. Wins in these games could provide Pittman the breathing room he desperately needs. Losses? They could make his seat unbearable.

In the high-stakes world of SEC football, every game is a referendum on a coach’s future. And for Sam Pittman, that future is hanging in the balance. If he can’t deliver victories—and soon—Arkansas Athletic Director Hunter Yurachek may have no choice but to start looking for a new direction.

[mepr-hide rules=”801″ unauth=”message”]

3. Dave Aranda – Baylor

The Balance Between Defense and Desperation

Dave Aranda finds himself walking a tightrope at Baylor, where the promise of defensive prowess is increasingly overshadowed by offensive ineptitude. The Bears’ recent 23-12 loss to #11 Utah in Week 2 is just the latest chapter in a saga of struggles against top-tier competition. Baylor fans are left wondering if Aranda’s tenure, once filled with optimism after a Sugar Bowl win, is now defined more by frustration than by future hope.

Offensive Woes: The Achilles’ Heel of Aranda’s Bears

The crux of Baylor’s problems lies in an offense that seems perpetually stuck in neutral. Putting up only 48 total yards in the first half against Utah is more than just a bad stat line; it’s a glaring indictment of an attack that’s failed to gain traction. And it’s not just a one-off issue—since that triumphant Sugar Bowl win in 2022, Baylor has gone 0-9 against ranked opponents. The narrative has become painfully clear: this team can’t win shootouts, and it struggles to even compete when faced with top-tier talent.

Fans and analysts alike are beginning to point fingers at both the offensive play calling and the development—or lack thereof—of the quarterback position. The frustration is palpable. If you can’t trust your quarterback to lead an effective offense, what’s left? And if Baylor’s best strategy is to simply “keep it close” rather than dominate, how far can that really take them in the hyper-competitive Big 12?

Pressure Mounting: A Fanbase on Edge

As each week passes, the pressure on Aranda is ratcheting up. The patience in Waco is wearing thin, and for good reason. Baylor has aspirations to be more than just a middling program. They want to compete for Big 12 titles and, ideally, carve out a spot in the expanded College Football Playoff picture. Right now, though, those dreams seem distant.

Questions around offensive strategy, execution, and quarterback trust are only intensifying. There’s a growing sense that the Bears are not only underperforming but also fundamentally failing to live up to their potential. If the offense doesn’t start firing soon, that pressure could turn from uncomfortable to untenable.

Signs of Hope: A Defense That’s Standing Tall

Yet, all is not lost for Dave Aranda. There’s a reason his seat isn’t yet scorching. The defense—his bread and butter—has shown signs of life. In that loss to Utah, it wasn’t the defense that let Baylor down; in fact, Aranda’s defensive play-calling helped keep the game within reach, especially in the second half. The unit’s resilience offers a glimmer of hope in an otherwise bleak landscape, suggesting that the core principles Aranda brought with him are still intact.

Moreover, there’s been some visible progress compared to last season, however incremental it might seem. And if there’s one thing that can buy a coach time, it’s evidence that things might be moving in the right direction, however slowly.

The Path Ahead: Aranda’s Defining Stretch

But make no mistake: the road ahead is fraught with peril for Dave Aranda. His seat is warming, and the thermostat is set by an offense that needs to find its footing—fast. The upcoming game against Air Force and the slate of conference matchups to follow will be telling. If Baylor can’t find a way to generate offense and secure wins against quality opponents, no amount of defensive savvy will be able to save Aranda’s job.

In this league, moral victories and solid defensive stands aren’t enough. Wins are the currency that matters. And unless Aranda can find a way to cash in on the offensive side of the ball, his defensive acumen may not be enough to keep him in Waco. For now, the seat is warming, but the flame is close to catching.

4. Scott Satterfield – Cincinnati

The Clock is Ticking on Game Management Woes

Scott Satterfield’s tenure at Cincinnati has hit a critical juncture early in the season. After a gut-wrenching 28-27 loss to Pitt in Week 2—a game where the Bearcats squandered a commanding 21-point lead—Satterfield’s ability to lead this program is facing intense scrutiny. In the competitive landscape of the Big 12, there’s little room for repeated mistakes, and Satterfield’s track record is quickly becoming more of a liability than an asset.

The Core Problem: A History of Poor Game Management

The narrative around Satterfield is getting more damning by the week. His teams have developed a bad habit of faltering when the stakes are highest. A 4-15 record in one-score games since 2019, excluding the 2018 season at Louisville, tells the story of a coach who struggles to close the deal. Whether it’s blowing leads, like the recent meltdown against Pitt, or questionable play-calling and decision-making in high-pressure moments, Satterfield seems to find new ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Cincinnati fans are already well-acquainted with the frustrations of last season, and the collapse against Pitt feels like an unwelcome déjà vu. The lack of composure and direction in critical situations is no longer just a trend; it’s a defining characteristic. And in the cutthroat environment of the Big 12, that’s not a reputation that leads to job security.

The Heat is On: Growing Discontent Among Fans and Boosters

The echoes of last season’s struggles are resonating loudly, and the fanbase is growing restless. What’s been most concerning isn’t just the losses, but the way they’ve come about. For a program transitioning into the Big 12, these kinds of collapses don’t just hurt the win-loss record; they erode trust in the direction of the team. Questions are mounting about Satterfield’s offensive strategy and his use of personnel. Are the Bearcats being put in the best position to succeed? So far, the results suggest otherwise.

And as frustration builds, so does the pressure. Cincinnati isn’t a program where mediocrity will be tolerated, especially with the increased visibility and expectations that come with Big 12 membership. The fanbase wants to see growth, adaptability, and most importantly, results. Anything short of that, and the calls for change will only grow louder.

Glimmers of Hope: Improvement Amidst the Chaos

Despite the growing heat on Satterfield, there are a few reasons for cautious optimism. The offense, while inconsistent, has shown flashes of potential improvement compared to last season. There have been standout individual performances, like Corey Kiner’s powerful rushing and Brendan Sorsby’s capable passing, that suggest the raw materials are there to build something more competitive.

Moreover, it’s still early in the season. There’s time to turn things around and prove that the collapse against Pitt was more an aberration than the norm. However, the window for proving that is narrowing rapidly.

The Weeks Ahead: A Make-or-Break Stretch for Satterfield

As it stands, Scott Satterfield’s seat is heating up, and fast. The upcoming game against Miami (OH) represents a crucial opportunity to regain some stability and momentum. More importantly, as Cincinnati heads into conference play, Satterfield must show he can manage games better and make the kinds of decisions that lead to wins, not heartbreaks.

If the Bearcats continue to stumble in winnable situations, Satterfield’s job security will be in serious jeopardy by mid-season. The path to redemption is clear but treacherous: demonstrate better game management, secure key victories, and give the fanbase a reason to believe that brighter days are ahead. If he fails to do so, Cincinnati may be looking for a new head coach sooner rather than later.

5. Joe Morehead – Akron

A Clock Ticking Louder in the MAC

Joe Moorhead’s journey at Akron has been anything but smooth, and after a brutal 52-6 loss to #2 Ohio State in the season opener, the path forward looks no easier. With just four wins in his first two years and an admission from Moorhead himself that Akron is “the worst football program in Division I football,” the reality is stark: this program is struggling to find any semblance of upward momentum.

The Heart of the Problem: A Program Stuck in Neutral

Three years into his tenure, Moorhead is facing the same criticisms that have haunted him from the start. Akron has lost ten one-score games in the past two seasons, including four in overtime—games that, with better execution or strategy, could have turned the tide for a beleaguered program. Instead, they stand as missed opportunities that underscore a worrying inability to finish strong.

There’s a sense that Akron’s struggles are not just tactical but psychological; the losing culture has dug deep roots, and Moorhead’s efforts to shift the belief system among his players haven’t yet borne fruit. When a head coach describes his own team in such dire terms, it raises the question: has Moorhead already lost faith in his ability to turn things around?

The Heat is Rising: A MAC Crisis in the Making

For a program like Akron, where the competitive bar in the MAC is relatively low, continued poor performance only serves to amplify the pressure on Moorhead. The inability to close out close games and break free from the cycle of losing has left fans and boosters increasingly restless. The whispers of frustration are growing louder with each passing week.

The expectation when Moorhead arrived was that he would leverage his reputation as one of the top offensive minds in college football to spark a turnaround. Instead, the Zips remain mired in mediocrity, with little sign that the corner is about to be turned.

A Glimmer of Hope: Mitigating Circumstances and Marginal Gains

However, Moorhead’s seat isn’t yet burning for a few reasons. His standing as a respected offensive strategist still carries weight, and there have been some areas of improvement, particularly in special teams play. Plus, it’s important to remember that the early part of Akron’s schedule hasn’t been forgiving—facing powerhouses like Ohio State and Rutgers makes any immediate turnaround hard to judge.

But Akron’s true test lies ahead in its MAC schedule. These are the games that Moorhead was brought in to win, and they represent his last, best hope to show significant progress.

The Path Ahead: A Make-or-Break Moment for Moorhead

As the MAC slate looms, Joe Moorhead finds himself at a crossroads. His seat is warming, and the thermostat is directly tied to Akron’s performance in winnable conference games. If the Zips can’t find a way to string together some victories and show tangible improvement, Moorhead may find himself looking for a way out—potentially back to the role of offensive coordinator, where his reputation still holds value.

For now, the heat is on but not yet scorching. However, if Akron continues on its current trajectory, Moorhead’s days in the lead chair could be numbered. The rest of this season is crucial, and it’s make-or-break time for the man tasked with fixing a program that’s been broken for far too long.

[/mepr-hide]

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES