Tulsa Golden Hurricane 2025 Season Preview: A New Era Under Tre Lamb

The Tulsa Golden Hurricane is about to rise from the ashes of a disastrous 2024 campaign.

After limping to a 3-9 record (1-7 in AAC play) and fielding one of the worst defensive units in college football last season, Tulsa decided to dismiss Kevin Wilson after just two seasons at the helm. In his place steps Tre Lamb, a 35-year-old coaching wunderkind with a proven track record of program transformation and a reputation for quick turnarounds.

The question on everyone’s mind: Can Lamb resurrect a program that ranked 131st out of 133 FBS teams in total defense last year?

The Pain Points That Derailed 2024

Defensive collapse doesn’t begin to describe what happened to Tulsa football last season.

The Golden Hurricane surrendered a staggering 496.8 yards per game, with their pass defense leaking 316.0 yards per contest through the air. These weren’t just bad numbers—they represented a complete defensive meltdown that undermined any chance of competitive play in the American Athletic Conference.

The 2024 season featured three exhilarating wins:

  • A 62-28 demolition of Northwestern State in the season opener
  • A heart-stopping 23-20 overtime victory against Louisiana Tech
  • A thrilling 46-45 Homecoming triumph over UTSA that gave fans momentary hope

But these bright spots were overwhelmed by crushing defeats that exposed Tulsa’s vulnerability:

  • A 45-10 dismantling by Oklahoma State that wasn’t even as close as the score suggests
  • A 49-7 annihilation by Army that highlighted fundamental defensive deficiencies
  • A season-ending 63-16 embarrassment against Florida Atlantic sealed Wilson’s fate

Nothing less than a complete defensive rebuild will suffice for 2025.

Why Tre Lamb Might Be The Perfect Solution

Tre Lamb doesn’t just build football programs—he transforms them with shocking speed.

Born September 16, 1989, in Calhoun, Georgia, Lamb arrives in Tulsa with an impressive résumé that showcases his ability to engineer immediate turnarounds. His coaching journey reveals a consistent pattern:

  • At Tennessee Tech, as offensive coordinator, he helped elevate the team from consecutive two-win seasons to a respectable 6-6 record in 2019
  • During his Gardner-Webb tenure (2020-2023), he delivered back-to-back conference championships and the program’s first-ever FCS playoff victory.
  • Most recently at East Tennessee State, he flipped a 3-8 team into a 7-5 contender in just one season.

Athletic Director Justin Moore couldn’t hide his enthusiasm when announcing Lamb’s hiring, stating, “He is young, energetic, and a proven winner. We feel he is exactly who we need to lead our program and restore a tradition of winning for Tulsa in this new era of college football.”

Though his 27-25 overall record (1-2 in NCAA Division I playoffs) comes primarily at the FCS level, Lamb’s consistent ability to revitalize struggling programs makes him an intriguing bet for a Tulsa program desperate for new energy.

His arrival represents more than just a coaching change—it signals the dawn of a new era.

The Coaching Brain Trust Built For Rapid Change

Lamb isn’t tackling this rebuilding project alone.

The new head coach has assembled a staff combining youthful energy with tactical expertise, each member carefully selected to address Tulsa’s most glaring weaknesses:

  • Brad Robbins (Offensive Coordinator/Quarterbacks Coach) brings innovative offensive concepts
  • Ty Darlington (Co-Offensive Coordinator/Tight Ends Coach) adds schematic flexibility
  • Josh Reardon (Defensive Coordinator/Safeties Coach) faces the monumental task of rebuilding Tulsa’s porous defense
  • Mike Gray (Co-Defensive Coordinator/Linebackers Coach) provides additional defensive expertise
  • Kam Martin (Associate Head Coach/Running Backs Coach) rounds out the leadership team

This staff faces the complex challenge of implementing new systems while maximizing the talents of returning players and newcomers.

Their success will ultimately determine whether Lamb’s first season becomes the foundation for a program renaissance or just another false start.

Roster Reconstruction: The Talent Influx

No turnaround happens without an influx of new talent.

Tulsa’s 2025 roster reconstruction follows a dual approach, balancing high school recruiting with strategic transfer portal additions to address immediate needs and build for the future.

The Golden Hurricane secured 14 high school signees, with several standouts poised to make an impact:

  • Javion Antai (OL, 6’4″, 285 lbs) brings local talent and tremendous size from Jenks High School, OK
  • Hudson Ball (DE, 6’2″, 240 lbs) arrives from Shiloh Christian High School, AR, targeting Tulsa’s desperate need for defensive playmakers
  • Banks Bowen (QB, 6’3″, 208 lbs) represents the future under center, coming from Lawrence High School, KS

Even more promising are the immediate-impact transfers joining the program:

  • Micah Tease (WR) brings SEC-level athleticism from Texas A&M
  • Sevion Morrison (RB) provides Big 12 experience after his stint at Kansas
  • Byron Turner Jr. (DE) arrives from Florida State as a potential defensive game-changer

Integrating these new pieces—particularly the transfer portal additions on defense—will be crucial to any year-one improvement under Lamb’s leadership.

Their development represents the first test of the new coaching staff’s player development abilities.

Cleaning Up The NIL Mess

Behind the scenes, Tulsa must address the NIL controversy that plagued the program throughout 2024.

Multiple players, including quarterback Cooper Legas and linebacker Myles Jackson, publicly alleged that former coach Kevin Wilson made verbal promises regarding NIL compensation that were never fulfilled. Wilson denied these claims, creating a cloud of distrust that potentially affected team morale and performance.

To prevent similar issues moving forward, Tulsa has established more robust NIL frameworks:

  • Partnerships with platforms like INFLCR and Opendorse to facilitate legitimate sponsorship connections
  • Creation of the Golden Hurricane Exchange to connect student-athletes with potential sponsors
  • Establishment of Hurricane Impact, an independent nonprofit collective, to solicit and distribute NIL funds

How Lamb and the administration navigate this evolving landscape will significantly impact their ability to attract and retain top talent.

In today’s college football ecosystem, effective NIL management isn’t optional—it’s essential for program stability and competitive recruiting.

The 2025 Schedule: A Balanced Opportunity

Tulsa’s 12-game slate offers a strategic mix of challenges and opportunities.

For the first time since 2004, all six home games at H.A. Chapman Stadium are scheduled for Saturday kickoffs, creating consistency for fans and players alike. These key matchups will likely shape the season’s trajectory:

  • August 30: Season opener vs. Abilene Christian (home)
  • September 6: Early road test at New Mexico State
  • November 15: Historic first-ever meeting with Oregon State (home)

This balanced schedule provides Lamb’s program with winnable non-conference games to build momentum while offering measurement opportunities against higher-caliber opposition.

How the Golden Hurricane performs in these contests will offer the first objective evidence of whether Lamb’s rebuilding project is ahead of schedule, on track, or facing unexpected hurdles.

Five Keys To Unlocking 2025 Success

Tulsa’s path from 3-9 doormat to competitive program requires five improvements.

  1. Defensive Resurrection Nothing matters more than fixing a defense that ranked near the bottom nationally in nearly every statistical category. Coordinators Reardon and Gray must implement schemes that maximize available talent while masking inevitable deficiencies during this rebuilding phase.
  2. Transfer Integration The transfer portal additions must acclimate quickly and perform above their previous levels, particularly on defense, where immediate impact is required to remain competitive.
  3. Offensive Identity Establishment Developing a clear, consistent offensive approach that plays to the roster’s strengths is essential in a conference known for offensive firepower. Tulsa cannot afford offensive inconsistency with its defensive limitations.
  4. Cultural Transformation Lamb must change the program’s culture and expectations, leveraging his track record of rapid turnarounds to instill belief in players accustomed to defeat.
  5. NIL Infrastructure Development Creating transparent, effective NIL processes will help attract and retain talent while avoiding the controversies that plagued the previous regime.

Success in 2025 doesn’t necessarily mean a championship season but establishing these foundational elements for sustainable program growth.

The metrics for year one success should be measured in competitiveness rather than wins and losses.

Realistic Expectations For Hurricane Fans

Patience might be the most important virtue for Tulsa supporters in 2025.

While Lamb’s history of rapid turnarounds provides cause for optimism, Golden Hurricane fans should maintain measured expectations. The defensive holes are too numerous, and the cultural changes too fundamental, to expect an overnight transformation from 3-9 to conference contention.

Consider these benchmarks for a successful 2025 campaign:

  • Achieving bowl eligibility (6-6) would represent significant progress
  • Defensive improvement from 131st nationally to top-100 would signal real growth
  • Competitive play in AAC contests, even in defeat, would demonstrate culture change
  • Player development is visible through individual statistical improvement
  • Recruiting momentum building toward the 2026 class

Establishing a foundation of competitive play and demonstrating clear progress throughout the season will be more important than the win total.

Every rebuilding project requires realistic timeline expectations—even for a coach with Lamb’s track record of quick fixes.

The New Hurricane Warning

A storm is brewing in Tulsa that might blow away years of mediocrity.

In Tre Lamb, the Golden Hurricane has secured a young, energetic coach with a demonstrated knack for program building and a history of exceeding expectations. With a strategic influx of talent through both high school recruitment and the transfer portal, coupled with a manageable schedule featuring six home games, the pieces are in place for Tulsa to begin its climb back toward relevance.

While 2025 represents just the first step in a longer journey, it offers something that the program has been missing for years: legitimate hope.

The Tre Lamb era begins now, and with it comes the potential for a Golden Hurricane resurgence that transforms a team from punching bag to puncher.

Football in Tulsa might just be fun again.

Become an Insider

Don’t miss another deep dive into college football’s most crucial storylines and program developments. Our team-by-team analysis gives you the insider perspective to understand where each program is headed in 2025 and beyond. Subscribe for free now to access our comprehensive breakdowns, exclusive hot seat rankings, and in-depth conference analysis delivered to your inbox. Join thousands of college football insiders who trust Coaches Hot Seat to keep them ahead of the game. Hit the link below to unlock all our premium content and never miss another update.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Week 12 Hot Seat Rankings Reveal The New Math of Firing Coaches: When Balance Sheets Trump Box Scores

Graphic by Tony Altimore @TJAltimore on X

When Money Changes Everything: College Football’s New Math

If you want to understand what’s happening in college football right now, forget about the polls, the playoff rankings, and even the win-loss records. Instead, study Tony Altimore’s (@TJAltimore on X) financial visualization of athletic department debt. This document looks less like a sports analysis and more like a hedge fund’s risk assessment of distressed assets. What Altimore has captured, in clean lines and horrifying clarity, is the moment when college football’s financial chickens have come home to roost.

The numbers are staggering enough to make a Wall Street quant nervous. Major athletic departments have the kind of revenue shortfalls that would make a leveraged buyout specialist think twice, all while trying to maintain the facade that their business model isn’t fundamentally broken. Our Hot Seat Rankings arrive in this financial maelstrom, a list that increasingly reads like a collection of toxic assets nobody knows how to value.

Consider the range of buyouts in play: Marshall could rid itself of Charles Huff for the price of a mid-level administrator’s salary ($125,917), while Baylor would need to liquidate the equivalent of a small endowment ($20-25 million) to move on from Dave Aranda. In any rational market, these numbers represent the cost of doing business. But in 2024’s college football economy, where athletic departments are juggling NIL collectives, revenue sharing, the House Settlement, facility arms races, and operational deficits that would make a venture capitalist blanch, even UMass’s relatively modest $800,000 obligation to Don Brown looks less like a buyout and more like a luxury they might not be able to afford.

We’re witnessing the emergence of a new market inefficiency: coaches who become unsackable not through their success but through the financial implications of their failure. In a world where half our Hot Seat candidates owe their job security to their buyout clauses rather than their win percentages, we’ve entered a realm where being too expensive to fire has become its own kind of competitive advantage.

Welcome to college football’s new normal, where balance sheets matter more than playbooks, and the most important numbers aren’t on the scoreboard but in the fine print of contracts that increasingly look like they were designed by derivatives traders rather than athletic directors.

Here’s our Top 10 for this week, plus a little insider information on each:

1. Don Brown – UMass

Don Brown sits atop college football’s hot seat list in a way that perfectly captures the industry’s bias for action over patience. UMass administrators, energized by their MAC invitation and staring at a manageable $800,000 buyout, seem eager to start fresh before the 2025 conference transition. The kind of institutional momentum creates its own gravity – the desire to make a splashy hire before joining a new conference to signal ambition and commitment to a brighter future. But there’s a fascinating market inefficiency at play here that nobody’s talking about: Brown might be the rare coach whose value to the program is about to increase precisely when they’re most inclined to remove him. His decades of MAC experience as a defensive coordinator at Central Michigan and Connecticut (during its MAC era) and his deep New England recruiting roots represent institutional knowledge that money can’t easily buy. UMass is preparing to make a classic institutional mistake: paying to remove expertise they’ll need to acquire again, all in service of a fresh start that might not be as fresh as they imagine. After all, the next coach will face the same fundamental challenges – navigating one more year of independence before transitioning to the MAC – with less experience in both contexts.

2. Charles Huff – Marshall

Huff’s position has improved slightly with a recent win, but he is in year 4 of a 5-year contract, and his small $125,917 buyout means Marshall could make a change without significant financial strain. His hot seat status remains high, though the recent win may have bought him some time.

3. Stan Drayton – Temple

This week, a 52 – 6 loss to Tulane has intensified the pressure on Drayton. With no specified buyout disclosed, Temple might have flexibility in making a coaching change if they decide to go that route. The program’s struggles in the American Athletic Conference likely contribute to his hot seat status.

4. Trent Dilfer – UAB

Dilfer’s hot seat status has worsened with another loss. His $4,116,667 buyout is significant for UAB, which might give him more time. However, his unusual comments, media interactions, and poor on-field results have quickly put him in a precarious position despite being only in his second year.

5. Dave Aranda – Baylor

Despite a bye week, Aranda remains on the hot seat. His substantial $20-25 million buyout is a major factor in Baylor’s decision-making process. Recent wins have improved his standing, and there’s an industry consensus that he’s trending towards returning in 2025, partly due to the financial implications of a coaching change.

6. Sam Pittman – Arkansas

Sam Pittman moves down to #6 on our Hot Seat Rankings in what might be college football’s most emotionally complicated coaching situation. He’s the kind of figure who makes fans want to invite him over for dinner while simultaneously wanting to throw their remote through the TV during games. His Arkansas team has shown improvement this year, but in a way that feels like watching a gifted student consistently turn in C+ work – there’s something both promising and maddening about it all. The blowout loss to Ole Miss exposed the fundamental disconnect: a team with SEC talent playing with the discipline of a midnight pickup game. And here’s where it gets interesting – and credit to Jackson Collier of the Hardwood Hogs Podcast (@JCHoops on X) for surfacing a contract provision that adds another layer to this Southern football soap opera: If Pittman can scrape together seven wins between Louisiana Tech and one more victory (including a potential bowl game), he triggers an automatic raise and extension. It’s the kind of clause that transforms Arkansas’s $10 million buyout decision from merely expensive to existentially complex. The boosters’ dilemma is almost Shakespearean: How do you fire someone everyone likes who’s making the team better but not as much better as it should be? Especially when the cost of doing so keeps threatening to go up?

7. Sonny Cumbie – Louisiana Tech

A loss this week has likely increased the pressure on Cumbie. With a $1,625,000 buyout, Louisiana Tech has some flexibility if it chooses to make a change. The program’s performance in Conference USA will determine his future.

8. Kevin Wilson – Tulsa

Wilson’s first season at Tulsa has been challenging, but a recent comeback win against UTSA may have improved his standing. His buyout details aren’t specified, but Tulsa’s financial situation and patience with new coaches could influence his job security.

9. Ryan Walters – Purdue

Despite the most recent 45-0 loss to Ohio State, reports suggest Walters is expected to get more time at Purdue. His $9,590,625 buyout and the administration’s recognition of NIL challenges in the Big Ten could provide him additional job security despite the team’s struggles this season.

10. Hugh Freeze – Auburn

Freeze’s $20,312,500 buyout is a significant factor in his job security. Auburn’s recent performance and Freeze’s past success at Ole Miss are considerations. While he’s on the hot seat, the financial implications of a coaching change might give him more time to turn the program around.

What’s your take? Let us know here

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

The Great Coaching Correction of 2024

In the high-stakes college football casino, the usual season-end trading frenzy has given way to something more unusual: fiscal restraint. We’re calling it “The Great Coaching Correction of 2024.” You see, athletic departments across the country are staring down a triple-witching hour of financial obligations that would make even a seasoned hedge fund manager break into a cold sweat: massive coaching buyouts, the impending $20 million House settlement expense per school, and another estimated $20 million (first year) hit from revenue sharing with athletes. Suddenly, the market for coaching talent is behaving less like cryptocurrency in 2021 and more like banks during a Federal Reserve stress test.

Billy Napier, Florida

Consider Billy Napier at Florida, a case study in modern football economics. In a world where 70% of Florida’s NIL payments flow to underclassmen—a stat that would make any Wall Street analyst question the business model’s sustainability—Napier has somehow convinced his CEO, Scott Strickland, to double down on their position. It’s the contrarian bet that either makes or ends careers. The market had priced Napier for failure after the Miami and Texas A&M disasters, but like a value investor spotting hidden assets, Strickland saw something others missed: stability in chaos. Or perhaps more accurately, he saw the price tag of starting over.

Napier’s Change Meter: Ice Cold

Sam Pittman, Arkansas

Meanwhile, Sam Pittman presents a different sort of market inefficiency in Arkansas. At 62, with a hip that’s giving out, he’s like an aging blue-chip stock with solid fundamentals but questionable long-term prospects. The twist? This comes courtesy of Jackson Collier of the Hardwood Hawgs Podcast – hidden in plain sight in his contract is a provision that would make any compensation committee blush: hit seven wins, including a bowl game, and trigger an automatic extension and raise. This incentive structure would make even the most hardened private equity executive wonder about governance. Let me repeat that – if he gets to seven wins – LA Tech plus one other, including the bowl – he gets a raise and extension. Completely doable.

Pittman’s Change Meter: Cool

Dave Aranda, Baylor

But the real arbitrage play is happening in Waco, Texas, where Dave Aranda’s job security has behaved like a volatile tech stock—swooping early, rebounding late, and keeping traders guessing. After opening 2-4 with wins against only Air Force and something called Tarleton State, Aranda’s position looked about as secure as a crypto wallet password. Yet here he is, three wins later, trading above his September lows on volume. His contract runs through 2029, and in this bear market for buyouts, that’s starting to look less like a liability and more like a forced diamond-hands strategy. If he is a smidge above .500, he stays.

Change Meter: Lukewarm trending cool

Charles Huff, Marshall

The distressed assets division brings us to Marshall’s Charles Huff, a coach whose contract is expiring like a soon-to-mature junk bond. At 27-20 over four seasons, including a telling 5-1 against non-Power Four competition this year, Huff’s position looks like a classic case of a middle-market firm unable to compete with the more prominent players. The smart money is betting on a change, though in this capital-constrained environment, even obvious moves come with additional scrutiny.

Huff’s Change Meter: Hot

Kevin Wilson, Tulsa

Then there’s Kevin Wilson at Tulsa, running a program performing like a penny stock in a bear market. When your highlight reel consists of a single comeback win against UTSA and a victory over 3-5 Louisiana Tech, you’re trading in territory usually reserved for companies about to be delisted. At 5-14 in two seasons, Wilson—a former blue-chip coordinator at Ohio State and Oklahoma—has turned premium pedigree into discount-bin performance.

Wilson’s Change Meter: Hot

Trent Dilfer, UAB

The most fascinating short position in the market might be Trent Dilfer at UAB. In less than two years, he’s taken Bill Clark’s ascending program—six straight winning seasons, two conference titles—and performed a dismantling usually reserved for failed hedge funds. His now-infamous “It’s not like this is freakin’ Alabama” quip reads like a CEO dismissing disappointing earnings by saying, “We’re not Apple.” The market rarely forgives such hubris, but at a $4.1 million buyout, the cost of forgiveness in this economy starts to look like a luxury good.

Dilfer’s Change Meter: Hot to Warm

Don Brown, UMass

At the extreme end of the risk spectrum sits Don Brown at UMass, whose position has moved from “distressed asset” to “complete write-off.” The market has spoken, and this particular security is being delisted.

Brown’s Change Meter: Scorching

High Profile, Power 4 Rumored Hot Seats

However, perhaps the most telling indicator comes from the “too big to fail” institutions—Florida State, USC, Oklahoma, Nebraska—where the Mike Norvells and Lincoln Rileys of the world operate with the kind of security usually reserved for government bonds. These programs have determined that stability, even at a premium, is preferable to the volatility of the coaching free agency market, especially with the looming costs of settlements and revenue sharing casting shadows over their balance sheets.

Change Meter: Ice Cold

Ultimately, college football’s coaching market operates with all the efficiency of a teenager with their first credit card. It overreacts to both success and failure, frequently misprices assets, and occasionally makes moves that would make a bankruptcy lawyer blush. But like all markets, it eventually finds its level—even if that level involves paying millions to make someone go away. This year, though, a cold dose of fiscal reality has tempered the usual irrational exuberance. When your industry is staring down $40+ million in new mandatory expenses, even the most trigger-happy athletic director thinks twice about adding another eight-figure buyout to the books.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES