Week 11 – Coaches Hot Seat Rankings

Week 11 is where the pretenders get exposed.

This is the part of the season where the rubber meets the road. Where your team and your staff prove they’ve “got it” – or don’t. The early-season excuses are gone. The “we’re still figuring things out” narrative doesn’t fly anymore. By Week 11, you either have a culture that wins close games, a roster that believes in the system, and donors who are writing checks – or you’re watching your career circle the drain in real-time. This is where coaches earn their next contract or start quietly updating their resumes. This is where athletic directors stop taking “we’ll turn it around” phone calls and start having very different conversations. Week 11 separates the programs that are building something real from those that are just delaying the inevitable. And for these ten coaches? We break each situation down below:

1. Jonathan Smith, Michigan State

Jonathan Smith is sitting on a $33M-$37M buyout that’s paid out over 62 monthly installments – the kind of number that makes firing him financially painful but not impossible. The problem? He’s already lost his fan base after humiliating losses, recruiting is cratering, and donors are hesitant to continue funding a sinking ship. New AD J Batt inherited this mess and now faces a massive decision to either force Smith to turn it around immediately or mobilize donors to eat the buyout and start over. Michigan State isn’t just losing games – they’re losing their identity. Every day Smith remains in place is another day that elite recruits look elsewhere.

2. Mike Locksley, Maryland

Mike Locksley has lost the locker room, and everyone knows it. NIL chaos has players checked out, fourth-quarter collapses have become routine, and October was an unmitigated disaster that had fans chanting for his firing in the stadium. His seat is scorching, #2 on the hot seat rankings, but he’s got one lifeline: a legitimately strong 2025 recruiting class that’s making the administration hesitate before pulling the trigger. The job market is also flooded with high-profile openings, which might give him a reprieve simply because Maryland doesn’t want to get into a bidding war and strike out. But make no mistake: donor support is evaporating, administration confidence is gone, and Locksley is one more ugly loss away from a Sunday morning firing.

3. Mike Norvell, Florida State

Mike Norvell dropped from #1 to #3 on the hot seat after a win over Wake Forest and enough player support to give the administration cover to hesitate on his $55M+ buyout. But dropping two spots isn’t a victory – it’s a temporary reprieve. He barely survived recent board meetings where his future was debated in real-time, boosters are in open revolt, and fan skepticism is at an all-time high. Behind closed doors, FSU is already planning for 2026 when that buyout becomes more manageable. Questions about fit, contract structure, and whether this marriage ever made sense continue to linger. Norvell bought himself time, but one more blowout loss and he’s right back at #1.

4. Luke Fickell, Wisconsin

Luke Fickell is torching every ounce of goodwill he built at Cincinnati, and it’s happening fast. Multiple blowout losses and a stagnant offense have Wisconsin fans throwing remotes through their TVs, while recruiting momentum has completely flatlined. The administration isn’t just disappointed, they’re demanding foundational change, the kind of language that means “fix this NOW or we’re moving on.” Recent staff decisions have only accelerated skepticism, and fan patience has completely evaporated, with social media ablaze and calling for a reset. The only thing keeping Fickell employed is his buyout, but donors are starting to ask the question every coach dreads: “How much would it actually cost to start over?” One more embarrassing loss, and that buyout begins looking like a bargain.

5. Justin Wilcox, California

Justin Wilcox has mastered the art of losing games in the fourth quarter, and Cal fans have moved past frustration into full acceptance mode. Navigating conference realignment chaos while failing to elevate recruiting has left the program stagnant at a time when adaptation is everything. The death knell? Donors have checked out completely; they’ve stopped writing checks, stopped believing in the vision, and started asking pointed questions about ROI. Doubts about future competitiveness aren’t whispers anymore; they’re loud conversations in booster meetings. Wilcox isn’t just on shaky ground – he’s standing on a fault line, and everyone is waiting for the earthquake.

6. Bill Belichick, North Carolina

Bill Belichick at North Carolina was supposed to be a revolution with six Super Bowl rings, transforming college football. Instead, it’s looking like a very expensive mistake. One Power Four win. Bowl eligibility hanging by a thread. And a coaching style built for NFL veterans that doesn’t translate to 18-year-olds who need recruiting, not drafting. The administration is losing patience fast because elite prospects are looking at UNC and seeing chaos, not a championship pedigree. Recruiting hasn’t improved; it has actually gotten worse. The contract details are murky but undoubtedly expensive, the kind of money that looked brilliant when everyone thought he’d win immediately and catastrophic now that he’s not. The experiment is failing, and everyone is watching to see how quickly UNC pulls the plug.

7. Shane Beamer, South Carolina

Shane Beamer fired his offensive coordinator and offensive line coach mid-season, a desperate move that screams “I’m fighting for my life.” And it might not be enough. Insiders are saying it plainly: unless South Carolina rallies for bowl eligibility, Beamer is done. Booster support is crumbling fast, with the money people who once championed his energy and “South Carolina guy” credentials now demanding answers about results. Pressure is coming from everywhere—fans, administration, donors—all pointing to the same conclusion: the current vision isn’t working. Recruiting is getting massacred by staff instability, because elite prospects don’t commit to programs where coaches are getting fired mid-season and the head coach’s future is a weekly radio debate. Beamer bought himself time with those firings, but bowl eligibility isn’t just a goal anymore—it’s a job requirement.

8. Tim Beck, Coastal Carolina

Tim Beck still has the backing of Coastal Carolina’s administration, thanks to recent bowl appearances, but that institutional patience has an expiration date that’s approaching quickly. Competitive culture is struggling in a Sun Belt where parity is real, and roster retention has become a nightmare in the portal era. Donors aren’t panicking yet, they’re not calling for his head yet, but they’re watching, whispering, and starting to ask the question every coach dreads: “What happens if we miss a bowl game this year?” That’s the line in the sand. Miss the postseason and the conversation changes overnight from “let’s give him more time” to “maybe it’s time for a new direction.” Beck has a lifeline, but it’s fraying fast.

9. Dave Aranda, Baylor

Dave Aranda’s shine has completely worn off at Baylor, and the 2021 Big 12 Championship feels like ancient history. A mediocre record, zero championship buzz, and a fan base that has moved from “trust the process” to “what exactly IS the process?” has the administration and boosters doing more than watching—they’re calculating buyout logistics. That’s not hot seat attention; that’s death row. The donor base is eroding, checking out, and wondering if their money is being invested wisely. Recruiting momentum is slowing to a crawl because elite prospects can smell uncertainty from a mile away. Aranda needs a strong finish, not just bowl eligibility, but something that reminds people why Baylor hired him in the first place. Because right now? Nobody remembers, and that’s the most dangerous position any coach can be in.

10. Mark Stoops, Kentucky

Mark Stoops was this close to being fired before a dramatic win at Auburn bought him a reprieve, but one victory doesn’t erase a multi-year SEC losing streak. Years of being demolished by conference opponents have left Kentucky feeling more like a basketball school’s side project than a legitimate SEC program, and the administration has had legitimate conversations about buyout numbers and replacement candidates. The buyout is sizeable but not insurmountable, meaning if things go south again, Kentucky can afford to move on. Stoops needs two things immediately: roster confidence (players who believe they can compete in the SEC) and donor confidence (boosters who believe their money isn’t being wasted). Both are shaky right now. The remaining games aren’t just about bowl eligibility; they’re about survival, and everyone is watching.

Where does your coach rank?

Want the full story on every coaching hot seat in America?

Newsletter subscribers get the expanded treatment, deep dives on each of the top 10 coaches, game previews that actually matter, and curated stories about coaching moves and timely college football topics delivered straight to their inbox every Tuesday and Friday during the season. No fluff. No filler. Just the insider information you need to stay ahead of the coaching carousel before it becomes headlines everywhere else. This isn’t just another college football newsletter—it’s your edge on understanding the power dynamics, buyout negotiations, and behind-the-scenes pressure that determines who stays and who goes. Subscribe here and get the complete picture twice a week.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Michigan Is 6-4 And Barely Functional. Michigan State Scores 13 Points Per Game And Can’t Stop Anyone. Here’s Why Saturday’s Rivalry Game Will Be A Clinical 30-13 Win For The Wolverines (And Why Neither Fanbase Should Celebrate)

There’s a moment in every rivalry when one team stops playing to win—and starts playing not to lose.

This is not a game between two good teams. This is a game between a disappointing Michigan squad that’s learned to stop embarrassing itself, and a Michigan State program that can’t stop the bleeding. The Wolverines aren’t elite. They’re just competent enough to handle a disaster.

Michigan Isn’t Good—They’re Just Less Bad Than Before

Control is not aggression.

For Michigan, it’s survival. After Oklahoma exposed them and USC humiliated them, Sherrone Moore’s program didn’t transform into something great. They transformed into something functional. They stopped trying to be what they’re not and started grinding out wins against inferior competition.

Justice Haynes runs hard because that’s all this offense can do.

7.4 yards per carry sounds impressive until you realize Michigan hasn’t played a defense worth a damn since Week 4. They’re averaging 188 rushing yards per game because they’ve played Maryland, Washington, and Illinois—not exactly murderers’ row. This isn’t a dominant rushing attack. It’s a mediocre offense that figured out how to pick on bad defenses.

Michigan fans aren’t celebrating this version of the team—they’re tolerating it.

Moore inherited a national championship roster and turned it into a 6-4 team that wins ugly. The offensive line is solid. The running back is good. Everything else? Pedestrian at best. This isn’t the program that won it all last year. This is the program desperately trying not to become irrelevant.

Michigan State Is a Complete Disaster

When you press for meaning, you lose it.

Michigan State isn’t just bad—they’re historically terrible. Four straight losses. 13 points per game in their last four conference games. 39.8 points allowed on average. Three straight second halves where they looked like they forgot football was a real sport.

Jonathan Smith’s second season in East Lansing has been a step backward.

The offense can’t score. The defense can’t stop anyone. The special teams are a liability. Smith’s rebuilds take time—his track record at Oregon State proves that—but right now, the Mel Tucker mess he inherited looks worse, not better.

Look at their play-calling. They abandon what works because nothing works. They force throws because they’re desperate. They substitute constantly because no combination of players makes a difference.

This is a program in free fall with no parachute.

The Actual Matchup: Mediocre vs Terrible

Football isn’t about momentum.

It’s about who can execute basic tasks without falling apart. Michigan can run the ball against bad defenses. Michigan State can’t stop anyone from running the ball. This isn’t strategy—it’s arithmetic.

Haynes will get his yards because Michigan State’s front seven is Swiss cheese. Michigan’s defense will suffocate an offense that couldn’t score on a JV squad. The Wolverines will win this game doing exactly what they’ve done for six weeks: run the ball, kill the clock, and wait for the other team to collapse.

That’s not dominance—that’s taking advantage of incompetence.

The third quarter will tell the story, like it always does. Michigan will come out running the same plays they’ve run all game. Michigan State’s defense will be tired, frustrated, and making mistakes. Haynes will break a couple of runs, Michigan will extend the lead, and the Spartans will quit.

Not because Michigan is great—because Michigan State is that bad.

This Rivalry Has Become One-Sided

Most people think rivalries equalize teams.

That’s a myth. Rivalries amplify the gap between programs going in opposite directions. Michigan is trending toward mediocrity. Michigan State is trending toward irrelevance.

When Haynes rips off his third big run, watch the Spartan sideline. Players will stop fighting. Coaches will stop believing. That’s when you know a program has lost its soul—when even rivalry week can’t manufacture a fight.

Michigan State came into this season hoping Jonathan Smith’s rebuild would show signs of life in year two. Instead, they’ve regressed. Smith’s track record suggests he can fix this—he turned Oregon State from laughingstock to contender—but rebuilding the Mel Tucker disaster takes time. Meanwhile, Michigan fans are wondering if Sherrone Moore is the guy to lead them back to relevance—or just another mediocre coach riding the fumes of Jim Harbaugh’s success.

The Real Story

It’s about two programs trying to figure out who they are.

Michigan isn’t elite anymore. They’re not even good. They’re just functional enough to beat bad teams and avoid total embarrassment. Moore has stabilized the program after a rough start, but stabilization isn’t excellence.

Michigan State, meanwhile, has no idea what they are—except terrible.

One team figured out how to stop the bleeding. The other can’t find the tourniquet. That’s not a rivalry game—that’s a mercy killing.

The Takeaway

Saturday won’t be close—it will be clinical.

Michigan 30, Michigan State 13. But don’t mistake clinical for impressive. Michigan will win because they’re playing a team that can’t score, can’t stop the run, and can’t manufacture any reason to believe things will get better.

This isn’t a statement win for Michigan—it’s a layup.

For Michigan State, it’s another reminder that this season can’t end fast enough. For Michigan fans, it’s another reminder that competent isn’t the same as contending.

And for the rest of college football? It’s a reminder that rivalry games only matter when both teams show up.

Saturday, only one team will bother.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

The Bush Push Was 20 Years Ago. USC Is Due For Another Heartbreaker At Notre Dame—Except This Time, The Trojans Are On The Wrong End: 30-27


USC rolls into South Bend with a 5-1 record, flashy offensive numbers, and a quarterback playing out of his mind.

Notre Dame sits at 4-2, licking their wounds from two heartbreaking losses to start the season. On paper, this looks like a coin flip. But here’s what everyone is missing: USC’s offensive explosion is a mirage—and Notre Dame’s elite defensive line is about to expose it.

Let me show you why.


The Narrative Everyone Believes

Jayden Maiava is having a Heisman-level season.

The kid leads the entire nation with a 93.5 QBR. He’s thrown for 1,852 yards through six games. His completion percentage (73.1%) is absurd. And he’s got weapons—Makai Lemon has 682 receiving yards and 6 touchdowns, Ja’Kobi Lane is averaging 17.4 yards per catch.

USC’s offense is averaging 552.3 yards per game.

Meanwhile, Notre Dame has already lost twice.

Both to ranked opponents. Both by a combined 4 points, sure—but losses are losses. So the question becomes: Can the Trojans’ explosive offense outduel Notre Dame at home?

Wrong question.


The Real Question No One Is Asking

Can USC’s inflated statistics hold up against the first legitimate defense they’ve faced all season?

Spoiler alert: They can’t.


The Truth Hidden In The Schedule

Let’s talk about USC’s competition.

Week 1: Missouri State (73-13 win)
Week 2: Georgia Southern (59-20 win)

You know what Missouri State is?

A team in its first year transitioning from FCS to FBS, ineligible for postseason play. You know what Georgia Southern is? A Sun Belt team that USC dominated by 39 points. These games are padding stats like crazy.

Remove those two cupcake games, and USC’s offense drops from 552 yards per game to roughly 430-440 against Power 4 competition.

Still good?

Sure. Elite? Not even close.

Now look at Notre Dame’s schedule:

  • Week 1: @ #10 Miami (Lost 24-27)
  • Week 2: vs #16 Texas A&M (Lost 40-41)
  • Every single opponent: Power 4 or better

Notre Dame opened with a potential preseason top-10 team in Miami and hosted a possible top-15 team in Texas A&M, and lost both games by a field goal and a point.

One team has been battle-tested against elite competition.

The other has been stat-padding against cupcakes. Guess which is which?


The Common Opponent Test

Both teams played Purdue.

Notre Dame beat them 56-30. USC beat them 33-17. Same opponent.

Notre Dame scored 23 more points and gained roughly 180 more yards.

When both teams faced the same level of competition, Notre Dame was significantly more dominant.

This is your canary in the coal mine.


The Matchup That Decides Everything

Forget the hype around Maiava for a second.

This game will be won or lost in the trenches, the critical battle: USC’s Offensive Line vs Notre Dame’s Defensive Line.

Here’s what you need to know:

Notre Dame’s defensive line is ranked 6th in the entire nation by Athlon Sports, featuring a deep 6-man rotation that can bring fresh pass rushers at you all game long.

Notre Dame’s run defense allows just 106.2 yards per game and 3.4 yards per carry.

That’s elite.

Now, USC’s offensive line has actually performed well this season.

They rushed for 224 yards against Michigan—the most Michigan had allowed all season. Maiava’s 93.5 QBR doesn’t happen with a terrible O-line. But here’s the thing: USC hasn’t faced a defensive front like this yet.

Not even close.

Notre Dame can throw six different elite pass rushers at you—Boubacar Traore, Bryce Young, Junior Tuihalamaka, Joshua Burnham, Jordan Botelho, Loghan Thomas.

When that rotation starts wearing down USC’s line in the third quarter, Maiava’s clean pockets disappear.

And when Maiava’s under pressure for the first time all season, Notre Dame forces 2.0 turnovers per game.

This is where the game breaks.


What Happens When USC Has The Ball

Maiava will get his yards.

The kid is too good not to. He’ll probably throw for 280-320 yards and 2-3 touchdowns. Lemon and Lane will make plays—they’re both averaging 15+ yards per catch for a reason.

But USC’s rushing attack—the thing that’s been averaging 226.5 yards per game—is about to hit a wall.

Notre Dame’s run defense will hold them to 95-125 yards, max.

Without a ground game, USC becomes one-dimensional. And one-dimensional offenses throw interceptions. Notre Dame forces 2.0 turnovers per game.

Maiava has only thrown 2 picks all season because he hasn’t faced pressure like this.

He’ll throw 1-2 more on Saturday.

USC’s projected output:

  • 24-31 points
  • 375-445 total yards
  • 1-2 turnovers

What Happens When Notre Dame Has The Ball

Notre Dame isn’t flashy.

They’re averaging 465.5 yards per game with 7.2 yards per play—and every single yard has come against quality competition. They’ll run the ball 35+ times. They’ll control the clock.

They’ll pound USC’s defense into submission.

USC’s run defense is solid (allowing 108.5 yards per game), but Notre Dame’s physical, balanced attack will wear them down.

Expect 140-165 rushing yards, 260-290 passing yards, and 2-3 touchdowns.

Notre Dame’s projected output:

  • 27-34 points
  • 400-455 total yards
  • 0-1 turnovers

The X-Factor Everyone Is Ignoring

Notre Dame is 0-2 against ranked opponents this season.

Both losses were heartbreakers. Both by a combined 4 points. They’re at home, they’re desperate, and they’ve been preparing for exactly this level of competition since Week 1.

And let’s not forget the history here.

Anthony Davis scored 6 touchdowns in 1972. The Bush Push in 2005—Reggie Bush helping push Matt Leinart into the end zone as time expired for a 34-31 win. This rivalry has a long history of USC breaking Notre Dame’s heart in the cruelest ways possible.

It’s been 20 years since the Bush Push, and South Bend hasn’t forgotten.

The players haven’t forgotten. Marcus Freeman hasn’t forgotten. The fans certainly haven’t forgotten.

USC?

They’re walking into the loudest stadium they’ve played in all year, against the best defense they’ve faced, with offensive stats inflated by two cupcakes. The pressure is entirely on USC to prove its stats are real.

And I don’t think they can.


The Bold Prediction

Notre Dame 30, USC 27.

Here’s how it plays out:

The first half is back-and-forth. Maiava looks great. Lemon makes a couple of explosive plays.

It’s 17-17 at halftime.

Third quarter, Notre Dame’s 6-man defensive line rotation starts to take over.

Fresh pass rushers every series. USC’s O-line tires. Maiava’s clean pocket disappears. Turnover. Notre Dame goes up 27-20.

In the fourth quarter, USC abandons the run because Notre Dame’s defense has shut it down completely.

Maiava throws for 100+ yards in the quarter, trying to catch up. Notre Dame controls the clock with their run game, bleeds time, and hangs on. USC gets the ball back with 2:00 left, drives to midfield, and the game ends on an incomplete pass.


Why I’m 65% Confident (Not Higher)

Look, Maiava is legit.

93.5 QBR doesn’t lie. The kid can play. And when you have receivers like Lemon (682 yards, 6 TDs) and Lane (313 yards) who can take any throw to the house, you’re never out of it.

One blown coverage, one big play, and USC wins.

That’s the 35% chance they pull this off.

But the other 65%?

That belongs to Notre Dame’s battle-tested defense, elite front seven, and home-field advantage against a team whose gaudy stats are about to get exposed. The Trojans’ magic number run hits a brick wall in South Bend.

And it won’t even be close by the fourth quarter.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Week 8 — Coaches Hot Seat Rankings

Three coaches were fired on Sunday.

Trent Dilfer. James Franklin. Trent Bray.

Gone.

When coaches start falling in October, everyone else feels it. The phone calls start. The quiet meetings happen. The pressure that was already there gets cranked up to a whole new level.

Here are the 10 coaches under the most pressure in college football right now:


1. Billy Napier, Florida (SEC)

Billy Napier is 21-23 at Florida. One upset over Texas doesn’t erase years of mediocrity. The Gators are paying him $7 million to compete for bowl eligibility while Georgia and Alabama compete for championships.

That’s unacceptable at Florida.


2. Hugh Freeze, Auburn (SEC)

Hugh Freeze came to Auburn with a redemption story.

A second chance after Ole Miss. Auburn gave him big money, full control, everything he needed to compete. The pressure is mounting because it’s not working.

Right now, Auburn isn’t competing.


3. Mike Norvell, Florida State (ACC)

Florida State hasn’t won an ACC game since November 2023.

Fifteen straight conference losses. Two full seasons. Zero ACC wins.

Mike Norvell went from 13-1 ACC Champions to unwatchable in less than a year.

FSU beat Florida earlier this season, and the media acted like they were “back.” They’re not—they’re 0-2 in ACC play. Norvell has had two years to figure out how to win in the ACC.

At Florida State, that’s unacceptable.


4. Jeff Choate, Nevada (Mountain West)

Jeff Choate is 4-15 at Nevada.

What worked at Montana State isn’t translating to the FBS level. Choate talks about tough, physical football, but Nevada is getting pushed around. The problem isn’t philosophy—it’s execution.

Choate is running out of time.


5. Joe Moorhead, Akron (MAC)

Joe Moorhead is 10-33 at Akron.

Elite offensive coordinator at previous stops. Winner at Fordham. But the Zips move the ball, rack up yards, then stall in the red zone—that’s coaching.

A 10-33 record over four years tells the story.


6. Luke Fickell, Wisconsin (Big Ten)

Luke Fickell was supposed to save Wisconsin football.

Wisconsin gave him everything—big money, full control, time to install his system. The defense has regressed, the offense looks disjointed, and the Big Ten is exposing every weakness. Wisconsin fans don’t want to hear about systems—they want wins.

Fickell isn’t meeting the Wisconsin standard yet.


7. Butch Jones, Arkansas State (Sun Belt)

Butch Jones failed at Tennessee.

Now he’s failing at Arkansas State. The Red Wolves are underperforming, players aren’t buying in, and fans aren’t showing up. Arkansas State thought Jones learned from his Tennessee mistakes.

The results suggest otherwise.


8. Justin Wilcox, California (ACC)

Cal got a fresh start with the move to the ACC.

New conference. New competition. New expectations. And here’s the number that matters: 8 wins.

That’s what Justin Wilcox needs to keep his job.

Look at what’s left on the schedule:

  • North Carolina
  • At Virginia Tech
  • Ranked Virginia
  • At Louisville
  • At Stanford
  • SMU

Six games—Cal needs to win five of them.

Wilcox is supposed to be a defensive guru who maximizes limited resources. But the Bears are getting manhandled by ACC competition—the defense can’t stop anyone, the offense can’t score. The math isn’t mathing.

Cal has a new chancellor—an alum, Class of ’83.

They hired Ron Rivera, NFL veteran head coach, as General Manager overseeing the football program. ESPN’s Gameday came to Berkeley last season. Everyone saw the potential. Cal has poured money and resources into this program—and they’re expecting results.

Can Willcox get the Golden Bears to 8 regular-season wins?


9. Sonny Cumbie, Louisiana Tech (C-USA)

Sonny Cumbie was supposed to bring offensive firepower to Louisiana Tech.

The Air Raid disciple. The Texas Tech coordinator everyone wanted to hire. But coordinating and head coaching are two completely different jobs—the offense has been inconsistent, the defense worse, and the program feels directionless.

Coordinator success doesn’t automatically translate to head coaching success.


10. Derek Mason, Middle Tennessee (C-USA)

Derek Mason is 4-14 at Middle Tennessee.

He’s a defensive coach in an era where offense wins championships. Mason is building a 2005 program in 2025, and Middle Tennessee can barely crack 20 points per game. MTSU fans are asking: What exactly are we getting better at?

If the answer is “nothing,” the pressure builds.


The Bottom Line:

Three coaches got fired this week—more will follow.

Athletic directors are making calls. Boosters are applying pressure. Coaches who thought they were safe realize they’re not.

Want the full picture?

Our newsletter subscribers get exclusive analysis of coaches ranked 11-25—the ones trending in the wrong direction but not quite in crisis mode yet.

Subscribe here to get all 136 FBS rankings every week.

Because pressure is a ranking—and everyone’s being measured.


Check out the complete 136 FBS Coaches Hot Seat Rankings.

No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

USC’s Starting Center Kilian O’Connor Is Out vs Michigan’s Elite Defense. Here’s Why The Trojans’ 338 Passing Yards Per Game Still Wins Them The Game 28-21 (And Why The Injury Will Be The Go-To Excuse If They Lose)

Lincoln Riley needs to win this game.

Not because USC’s season depends on it—though a loss would hurt their playoff chances. Riley needs to win because he’s in the middle of a three-game stretch that will define whether he’s a program-builder or just another coach who couldn’t handle the jump to a major conference. No. 15 Michigan at home, then at No. 16 Notre Dame, then at Nebraska. Three brutal tests in three weeks. The Cornhuskers aren’t ranked in the AP Poll, but they’re ranked 22nd by The New York Times and are receiving votes in multiple polls. Three chances to prove USC belongs in the Big Ten elite.

Win two of three, and the critical mass of Trojan supporters stays on board. Go 1-2 or worse, and the questions get louder.

So naturally, USC’s starting center Kilian O’Connor is out with a leg injury.

The Injury Factor: USC’s Built-In Excuse

O’Connor went down against Illinois and will miss multiple weeks, including this game. Losing your starting center, a team leader, and a critical piece of the offensive line against Michigan’s dominant defensive front isn’t ideal. Without O’Connor, pass protection timing gets disrupted. Run blocking schemes lose continuity. Michigan’s defensive front will relentlessly attack backup center J’Onre Reed.

If Riley loses, this injury becomes the convenient narrative. Not his fault. Not a coaching problem. Just bad injury luck at the worst possible time.

But here’s the problem: USC should still win this game.

Why USC Wins (Even Without O’Connor)

USC does what Michigan can’t; they hurt you through the air. 338 passing yards per game. 72.1% completion rate. 2.4 passing touchdowns per game. They’re efficient, explosive, and capable of scoring in bunches. Michigan’s secondary is vulnerable, allowing 206.4 passing yards per game at a 65.1% completion rate.

Even with a backup center, USC’s passing attack should be able to exploit Michigan’s weakness. Quick passes, screens, play-action to neutralize pressure—the scheme adapts. Expect 280-320 passing yards from USC.

Michigan’s run defense is elite, allowing just 77 yards per game at 2.4 yards per carry. USC will struggle on the ground. Expect 80-110 rushing yards. But USC doesn’t need to dominate the run game. They need their quarterback to pick apart Michigan’s secondary.

USC generates 370-430 total yards and scores 24-28 points.

Why Michigan Can’t Keep Pace

Michigan’s offense runs through one dimension: the ground game. 237.8 rushing yards per game at 6.4 yards per carry. It’s physical, effective Big Ten football. They’re getting healthier, too. Starting left guard Giovanni El-Hadi and tight end Hogan Hansen are both probable to return.

But their passing game is borderline nonexistent. Just 200.6 passing yards per game with a 58.8% completion rate and 0.6 passing touchdowns per game. That’s not a typo—they throw a touchdown pass roughly every other game.

USC knows this. They’ll stack the box, dare Michigan to throw, and force them into predictable situations. Michigan will grind out 190-220 rushing yards and score 20-24 points. They’ll control the time of possession and keep it competitive.

But when Michigan falls behind and needs to throw? They can’t keep pace.

The Verdict: Riley Survives Game One

USC wins, 28-21.

Michigan’s healthier offensive line helps them sustain drives and score consistently through the ground game. USC’s backup center struggles at times, limiting explosive plays. The game stays tight throughout four quarters.

But USC’s passing game talent—even compromised without O’Connor—proves too much for a Michigan team that can’t match their scoring through the air.

The wildcard: If Michigan’s defensive line overwhelms the backup center early and forces turnovers, their ball-control offense could grind out a stunning upset. But that’s unlikely.

More likely? Riley wins Game One of his three-game gauntlet, the stats hold up, and USC moves to 5-1. Then it’s on to the next test.

And if Riley loses? Don’t worry—the O’Connor injury will be the headline, not the performance. The excuse is pre-packaged. The narrative writes itself.

But Riley can’t afford to use it twice more in this stretch.

Three games. Three chances. One has to go right for the injury excuse to work. If USC goes 0-3 or 1-2 in this stretch, no amount of injury talk will save Riley from the questions about whether he can win the games that matter in the Big Ten.

Saturday is Game One. The clock is ticking.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Martin Jarmond Set DeShaun Foster Up To Fail. Now UCLA’s Athletic Director Should Be The One Looking For A New Job.

Martin Jarmond fired DeShaun Foster after 15 games, but the real problem sits one floor above the football offices.

UCLA’s athletic director created the perfect storm that destroyed Foster’s tenure before it began. The hasty hiring process, inadequate resources, and administrative dysfunction all trace back to one person: the man who pulled the trigger on Foster’s dismissal.

Here’s why Jarmond should be updating his resume.

The Timeline Tells The Real Story

Foster never had a fair chance at UCLA because Jarmond bungled the coaching transition from the very beginning.

In November 2023, Chip Kelly was openly shopping for coordinator jobs elsewhere. Instead of making a clean break, Jarmond let the situation drag on for nearly six weeks. Kelly finally left on February 2, 2024, just weeks before spring camp.

The damage was already done:

  • Recruiting class decimated
  • Transfer portal window missed
  • Staff continuity destroyed
  • Spring preparation compromised

Foster was told he wouldn’t be considered for the head coaching job if Kelly left. He took the running backs job with the Las Vegas Raiders. When Kelly bolted two weeks later, UCLA had no viable candidates willing to leave their current positions so close to spring practice.

Jarmond made calls to other coaches, but no one was going to abandon their team weeks before training camp.

The UCLA players rallied around Foster, and Jarmond gave him the job with little time to prepare. It was a desperation move masquerading as a feel-good story.

Foster Inherited An Impossible Situation

The numbers don’t lie about what Foster walked into at UCLA.

Financial constraints:

  • Reduced Big Ten revenue sharing
  • Limited NIL resources compared to Big Ten peers
  • Budget restrictions on staff expansion
  • Facility upgrades delayed or cancelled

Roster challenges:

  • Late start on transfer portal acquisitions
  • Minimal time to evaluate existing players
  • Spring practice shortened by hiring timeline
  • No established recruiting relationships

Administrative support:

  • No clear vision for Big Ten transition
  • Conflicting directives from university leadership
  • Unclear reporting structure with new chancellor

Foster went 5-10 in 15 games, but considering the circumstances, the surprise is that UCLA won five games at all.

The Zoom Call Revealed Everything

More than 100 former UCLA players held a Zoom call with Jarmond after Foster’s firing, and the conversation exposed the real problems in Westwood.

Former players told Jarmond directly:

  • He needs to listen more than he talks
  • There’s a disconnect between athletics and program traditions
  • Foster was active in recruiting local high schools
  • Previous coaches ignored alumni outreach entirely
  • The athletic department lacks a central point of contact for former players

“Martin was told he needs to listen more than he does,” one participant revealed.

The Zoom call wasn’t about defending Foster.

It was about confronting Jarmond’s broader failures as an athletic director. Former players demanded accountability from the person directly responsible for UCLA’s decline.

Chancellor Frenk Sees The Problem

The power struggle between Jarmond and Chancellor Julio Frenk reveals who really understands UCLA’s situation.

Frenk told the LA Times he intends to be “very involved in the athletic department and the football program, recognizing that success in a marquee sport like football can be financially advantageous for the school as a whole.”

This contrasts sharply with former Chancellor Gene Block, who was “notoriously removed from athletics.”

Frenk’s involvement signals recognition that Block’s hands-off approach failed. The new chancellor understands what Block and Jarmond missed: football success drives university-wide benefits.

Multiple sources confirm the coaching search committee will report directly to Frenk, not Jarmond.

When your boss creates a workaround to bypass your authority, it’s usually a sign your days are numbered.

Bill Plaschke Said The Quiet Part Out Loud

LA Times columnist Bill Plaschke published a scathing column arguing Jarmond should not be allowed to hire the next coach.

Plaschke blamed Jarmond for the “wreckage” of UCLA football, specifically calling out:

  • Mishandling Chip Kelly’s departure
  • The rushed Foster hiring process
  • Lack of adequate support for Foster
  • Creating systemic problems beyond coaching

When the city’s paper of record publishes a column calling for an athletic director’s removal from a coaching search, it reflects widespread institutional failure.

Plaschke captured what many UCLA stakeholders believe: the problem isn’t coaching, it’s leadership.

The Kelly Contract Extension Debacle

Jarmond’s pattern of poor decision-making extends beyond the Foster situation.

In December 2021, Kelly’s contract was subject to renewal clauses. His tenure had been unsuccessful, but Jarmond offered him a contract extension without a definitive decision deadline.

Kelly dragged out the process for months:

  • His representatives floated Oregon Ducks interest
  • Several qualified potential coaches took jobs elsewhere
  • UCLA missed multiple hiring cycles
  • Uncertainty damaged recruiting and staff retention

Good athletic directors create timelines and stick to them.

Jarmond allowed coaches to control processes that should have clear administrative deadlines. The Kelly extension saga revealed an athletic director unwilling or unable to make difficult decisions when necessary.

The Attendance Scandal

The LA Times recently reported that UCLA has been “blatantly and artificially boosting attendance numbers at games at the Rose Bowl.”

Reporter Ben Bolch obtained data from actual ticket scan machines and compared them to UCLA’s attendance announcements. The difference was usually several thousand, consistently inflated by the university.

This isn’t just bad optics.

It’s institutional dishonesty that reflects broader problems with Jarmond’s leadership. When athletic departments resort to fabricating attendance figures, it signals deeper issues with accountability and transparency.

UCLA Needs New Leadership

Foster’s firing was the inevitable result of Jarmond’s administrative failures, not coaching incompetence.

The evidence is overwhelming:

  • Poor timing on coaching transitions
  • Inadequate resource allocation
  • Disconnect from alumni and program traditions
  • Inflated attendance reporting
  • Loss of confidence from university leadership

Foster deserved better support. UCLA deserved better planning.

Both paid the price for organizational dysfunction that starts at the top of the athletic department.

The next coaching search faces identical systemic problems that doomed Foster unless UCLA addresses the real issue: the continued employment of Martin Jarmond as athletic director.

UCLA can fire coaches every 15 games, or they can fire the person who hires the wrong coaches for the wrong reasons at the wrong time.

The choice seems obvious to everyone except the person making the decisions.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Oklahoma’s #6 Hot Seat Coach Has 12 Games To Save His Job. Michigan Is Game #2.

Here’s what everyone in college football knows but won’t say out loud.

Brent Venables is coaching for his career on Saturday. Not his season. His career. When you’re ranked #6 out of 136 coaches on the Coaches Hot Seat rankings, every game becomes a referendum on your future.

The Math Is Simple:

  • 22-17 record in three seasons at Oklahoma
  • Two losing seasons out of three
  • #6 on the hot seat rankings (danger zone territory)
  • A schedule ESPN calls the toughest in college football

Meanwhile, Sherrone Moore sits comfortably at #36 in our rankings. That’s the difference between “we’re watching” and “we’re planning your replacement.”

Here’s What Makes Saturday Fascinating:

Oklahoma went nuclear in the offseason. They brought in 21 transfer portal players, hired a new offensive coordinator, and landed John Mateer—the quarterback who led all of college football with 44 total touchdowns last season.

Michigan countered with the #1 recruit in the country, Bryce Underwood, who already proved he belongs by going 21/31 for 251 yards in his debut.

The Stakes:

For Venables, this is his best shot at an early statement win before facing eight projected top-25 opponents. Win, and the complete program overhaul looks genius. Lose, and the whispers become roars.

For Moore, this is about proving their offensive transformation can execute against proven competition.

The Truth:

Desperate coaches make dangerous opponents. When your job depends on 12 games, every snap gets magnified. Every decision gets scrutinized.

Saturday tells us whether that desperation breaks Oklahoma or brings out its best.

We Track Coaching Pressure So You See The Warning Signs First

You just read the kind of analysis that predicted coaching changes before they happened. While other publications wait for the obvious, we identify the warning signs early.

The Coaches Hot Seat newsletter delivers:

  • Weekly hot seat rankings with data-driven predictions
  • Inside analysis on coaching moves before they’re announced
  • The real financial stories behind hiring and firing decisions
  • Zero fluff, zero access journalism, zero protecting feelings

Because college football moves fast.

And the programs that survive are the ones that see what’s coming next—not the ones caught reacting to what already happened.

Get the analysis that matters before it becomes obvious to everyone else.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Why USC’s October Schedule Is Sabotaging Their Championship Dreams (And What Every High Performer Can Learn From It)

Most people think October rivalry games are magical.

They’re missing the point entirely.

USC’s October Problem

While other programs optimize their schedules for conference championships, USC flies cross-country in the middle of its toughest stretch.

Notre Dame in October. Then right back into Big Ten play.

It’s like running a marathon, then immediately sprinting 400 meters while your competitors get to rest.

The Independence Advantage

Here’s what Notre Dame gets that USC doesn’t:

  • No conference championship game
  • Complete scheduling flexibility
  • Strategic bye weeks when they need them
  • Zero back-to-back rivalry pressure

Meanwhile, USC is locked into:

  • Cross-country travel nightmares
  • October scheduling chaos
  • Big Ten championship requirements
  • Playoff implications for every game

The Hidden Cost of Bad Timing

This isn’t just about football.

Every high performer faces the same scheduling trap. That monthly client call during your busiest week. The annual conference is right before your biggest deadline. The tradition that worked perfectly 10 years ago, but now creates unnecessary friction.

We keep these commitments because they are important to us. Because changing them feels like giving up.

But innovative competitors know something most people don’t: timing isn’t just logistics—it’s strategy.

The Bottom Line

USC Athletic Director Jen Cohen isn’t trying to kill tradition. She’s trying to save it by making it work within reality.

The best rivalries aren’t preserved by blind loyalty. They’re maintained by smart adaptation.

Your calendar is your competitive advantage. Protect it like your career depends on it.

Because it does.

Tired of surface-level college football takes? Coaches Hot Seat delivers the analysis that actually matters. Rankings Tuesday, deep breakdowns Friday. Join for free.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Illinois Football 2025 Season Preview: Championship Aspirations Meet Reality

Illinois football is no longer a punchline.

The Fighting Illini enter the 2025 season with something they haven’t experienced in decades: legitimate championship expectations. Following a breakthrough 10-3 campaign that culminated in a Citrus Bowl victory over South Carolina, Bret Bielema’s program has captured national attention and positioned itself among college football’s emerging powers.

The Numbers Don’t Lie: Illinois Has Arrived

The preseason rankings tell the story of a program transformed:

  • Fox Sports’ Joel Klatt: #10
  • ESPN: #11
  • CBS Sports: #12
  • 247 Sports: #14
  • On3.com: #7 (yes, you read that correctly)

This marks Illinois’ first preseason ranking since 2008, and the highest preseason expectations in over two decades. “Everyone will tell you around Illinois they’re shooting for college football playoffs,” analyst Jeremy Werner said on the Cover 3 Podcast.

That’s not wishful thinking anymore.

Luke Altmyer: The Quarterback Who Changed Everything

The foundation of Illinois’ championship dreams rests on one decision: whether Luke Altmyer will return.

In front of a packed State Farm Center during a basketball game, the junior quarterback announced he would return for his senior season rather than entering the transfer portal. That announcement might have been the most critical moment for Illinois football in 20 years.

Altmyer’s 2024 numbers were exceptional:

  • 2,717 passing yards
  • 22 touchdowns, five interceptions
  • 61% completion percentage
  • #34 nationally in passer rating (144.9)
  • 5 career game-winning drives (most among active QBs)

But the numbers only tell part of the story. Altmyer has become the clutch performer Illinois desperately needed, throwing three game-winning touchdown passes in the final minute or overtime during 2024 alone.

Bret Bielema Gets Paid (And Illinois Gets Certainty)

Illinois wasn’t taking any chances with their coach.

The university signed Bielema to a six-year contract extension through 2030, worth $7.7 million annually. The deal signals institutional commitment and provides the stability that championship programs require.

Since arriving in 2021, Bielema has compiled a 28-22 overall record and transformed Illinois from Big Ten doormat to legitimate contender. His “tough, smart, dependable” philosophy has produced tangible results:

  • 12 NFL draft picks in four seasons
  • Two bowl appearances
  • First 10-win season since 2001
  • Largest attendance growth in the nation

The Schedule: A Championship Window Opens

Illinois caught a break with its 2025 schedule.

The Illini avoid traditional Big Ten powers Penn State, Oregon, and Michigan. Their toughest opponent? Defending national champion Ohio State, but that game comes at home in Memorial Stadium.

Early season tests will define the trajectory:

  • Duke (road): Nine-win team in 2024 with talented QB Maalik Murphy
  • Indiana (road): Big Ten opener against Curt Cignetti’s improved Hoosiers
  • USC (home): Lincoln Riley’s Trojans in a must-win spot
  • Ohio State (home): The measuring stick game

Werner emphasized the importance of those early road games: “I think that’s going to tell us a lot about this team.”

Replacing NFL Talent Through the Portal

Illinois lost significant production to the NFL:

  • Pat Bryant (WR): Drafted by Denver Broncos (3rd round)
  • Zakhari Franklin (WR): Signed with Las Vegas Raiders
  • Seth Coleman (LB): Joined Seattle Seahawks
  • JC Davis (OL): Departed for NFL opportunities

But Bielema’s staff struck back through the transfer portal.

The headliner addition is West Virginia wide receiver Hudson Clement, who posted 51 catches for 741 yards in 2024. Ball State’s Justin Bowick (6’5″, compared to the NFL’s Courtland Sutton) adds size and athleticism to the receiving corps.

Defensively, Wisconsin transfers James Thompson Jr. and Curt Neal bolster a front seven that needs to replace Coleman’s pass-rushing production. Florida State’s Tomiwa Durojaiye provides additional depth and upside.

The Foundation: 16 Returning Starters

Here’s why Illinois isn’t a one-year wonder: continuity.

The Illini return 16 starters from their 10-win squad, creating the experience and chemistry that championship teams require. Key returning players include:

  • Xavier Scott (DB): Led team with four interceptions
  • Matthew Bailey (DB): Citrus Bowl defensive MVP (93 tackles)
  • Gabe Jacas (LB): Top pass rusher, National Defensive Player of the Week
  • Josh McCray (RB): Citrus Bowl MVP (609 rushing yards)

This level of roster retention is rare in the transfer portal era, giving Illinois a significant competitive advantage.

Statistical Reality Check: What Needs Improvement

Illinois’ 2024 numbers reveal both strengths and concerns.

Offensive Strengths:

  • 364.8 total yards per game
  • 211.2 passing yards per game
  • 153.6 rushing yards per game
  • Only 40.2 penalty yards per game (excellent discipline)

Defensive Concerns:

  • 373.2 total yards allowed per game
  • 224.8 passing yards allowed
  • 148.4 rushing yards allowed

The defensive numbers suggest room for improvement, especially against high-powered offenses like Ohio State. The transfer portal additions should help, but Illinois must prove they can stop elite attacks consistently.

College Football Playoff: Dream or Destiny?

The expanded playoff format creates new opportunities for programs like Illinois.

ESPN’s Heather Dinich ranked Altmyer as the sixth-most impactful returning player nationally, noting that Illinois “can be a CFP sleeper team by competing for the Big Ten title and earning an at-large bid if it doesn’t win the league.”

The comparison being made? Indiana’s shocking 11-1 season and playoff appearance in 2024.

The comparison being made? Indiana’s shocking 11-1 season and playoff appearance in 2024.

If Illinois can navigate early road tests and avoid significant injuries, a 10-win season and playoff berth become realistic rather than fantasy.

The Bottom Line: This Is Illinois’ Moment

Vegas set the over/under for Illinois wins at 7.5, but that feels conservative.

The combination of experienced leadership, coaching stability, favorable scheduling, and strategic roster additions creates the foundation for sustained success. Illinois has moved beyond hoping for bowl eligibility to expecting championship contention.

The 2025 season represents more than an opportunity to repeat recent success—it’s a chance to establish Illinois as a permanent fixture among the college football elite.

The question isn’t whether Illinois can compete at the highest level.

The question is whether they’re ready to handle the pressure that comes with finally being taken seriously.

The Next Billion Dollar Game

College football isn’t just a sport anymore—it’s a high-stakes market where information asymmetry separates winners from losers. While the average fan sees only what happens between the sidelines, real insiders trade on the hidden dynamics reshaping programs from the inside out.

Our team has embedded with the power brokers who run this game. From the coaching carousel to NIL deals to transfer portal strategies, we’ve mapped the entire ecosystem with the kind of obsessive detail that would make a hedge fund analyst blush.

Why subscribe? Because in markets this inefficient, information creates alpha. Our subscribers knew which coaches were dead men walking months before the mainstream media caught on. They understood which programs were quietly transforming their recruiting apparatuses while competitors slept.

The smart money is already positioning for 2025. Are you?

Click below—it’s free—and join the small group of people who understand the real value of college football’s new economy.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Oregon Football 2025: The Championship Window Is Wide Open

The Oregon Ducks are about to find out if lightning can strike twice.

After their historic undefeated regular season and Big Ten Championship in 2024, the Ducks face a moment of truth. Can they maintain championship-level performance while replacing Heisman finalist Dillon Gabriel and 10 NFL Draft picks? Or will 2024 prove to be a magical one-year run that can’t be replicated?

The answer lies in how quickly Oregon’s young stars can fill massive shoes.

The Foundation Is Rock Solid

Oregon didn’t just win in 2024—they dominated.

Their numbers tell the story of a program firing on all cylinders:

  • 13-1 overall record with a perfect 12-0 regular season
  • 34.86 points per game (4th nationally)
  • Only 19.43 points allowed per game
  • Signature wins over Ohio State (32-31), Michigan (38-17), and Washington (49-21)
  • First Big Ten Championship in program history

The only crack in the armor? A sobering 41-21 loss to Ohio State in the Rose Bowl exposed defensive vulnerabilities against elite competition.

But here’s what that loss represents: proof that Oregon belongs on the biggest stage, with lessons learned about what it takes to win at the highest level.

The $64,000 Question: Can Dante Moore Be “The Guy”?

Everything hinges on the quarterback position.

Dillon Gabriel’s departure creates the most significant question mark on Oregon’s roster. Enter Dante Moore, the former five-star UCLA transfer who spent 2024 learning Will Stein’s system from the sidelines.

Here’s why Moore could explode in 2025:

  • Full year of development in Stein’s offense without game pressure
  • Elite arm talent that made him a top-5 recruit
  • Quick decision-making system perfectly suited to his skill set
  • Chemistry built with receivers throughout spring practice

On3 analyst JD Pickell believes Moore’s patient development was crucial: “My biggest takeaway is he is going to be able, I think, play with better anticipation having sat for a year. Anticipation in Will Stein’s offense = points.”

Moore’s 2023 UCLA experience—52.4% completion rate, 11 TDs, 9 INTs—represents learning on the fly in a complex system. Now he gets to showcase what a year of preparation can do.

The backup situation adds intrigue with Austin Novosad choosing to stay rather than transfer, creating valuable depth behind Moore.

The Receiving Corps Just Got Very Interesting

Oregon’s passing attack faces both crisis and opportunity.

The crisis? Evan Stewart, projected as the Ducks’ top receiver, suffered a knee injury believed to be a torn patellar tendon that could sideline him for the entire 2025 season. Stewart’s 48 catches for 613 yards in 2024 represented crucial production that must be replaced.

The opportunity? Enter the “Moore to Moore” connection.

Five-star freshman Dakorien Moore—the nation’s top-ranked receiver—arrives with elite credentials and early raves from teammates. Gary Bryant Jr. called him “very explosive” and praised his versatility: “Can play any position in the receiver room from X, Y, Z, A. Explosive receiver. Got good hands. Got good routes.”

The supporting cast includes:

  • Justius Lowe (21 catches, 203 yards in 2024)
  • Gary Bryant Jr. (limited by injury but productive when healthy)
  • Malik Benson (Florida State transfer, adding depth)
  • Jeremiah McClellan (emerging young talent)

With Stewart’s absence creating immediate opportunities, expect Dakorien Moore to fast-track into a starring role alongside quarterback Dante Moore.

Defense: Elite Edge Rush Meets Secondary Youth

Oregon’s defense returns its most dominant weapon in Matayo Uiagalelei.

The All-Big Ten edge rusher led the team with 10.5 sacks and 12.5 tackles for loss, establishing himself as one of college football’s premier pass rushers. Paired with returning edge rusher Teitum Tuioti and USC transfer Bear Alexander on the interior, Oregon’s pass rush should remain elite.

The secondary tells a different story entirely.

After sending seven defensive backs to NFL camps, Oregon rebuilt with elite recruits:

  • Five-star cornerback Na’eem Offord (nation’s top-ranked corner)
  • Five-star safety Trey McNutt (elite athleticism and range)
  • Multiple four-star additions providing depth

“I feel like I felt the most love at Oregon,” Offord said about his recruitment. “The whole staff had been recruiting me from the beginning. Everything, just everything there. I feel like Oregon just fits me.”

The question isn’t talent—it’s experience. These young stars must perform immediately against Big Ten offenses that will test every coverage.

Dan Lanning’s Recruiting Machine Keeps Rolling

Oregon’s 2025 recruiting class proves this success isn’t accidental.

The numbers are staggering:

  • No. 3 national ranking according to 247Sports
  • Three five-star prospects (most in program history)
  • 15 four-star recruits
  • Best recruiting class in the Big Ten

Expert Matt Prehm from Ducks Territory summarized Oregon’s talent level: “They’ve recruited as well as they’ve ever done at Oregon. They have NFL players on both sides of the football. They have first-round draft picks on both sides of the football. This is as talented of a group as possible.”

The 2026 class momentum continues with multiple five-star commitments and official visits from top prospects, indicating sustainable excellence rather than a one-year flash in the pan.

Schedule Sets Up for Another Championship Run

Oregon catches two massive breaks in 2025.

They avoid both Ohio State and Michigan in regular-season play, removing the conference’s two biggest threats from their path to another Big Ten Championship. The toughest tests come in late September (at Penn State) and November road trips to Iowa and Washington.

FanDuel Sportsbook has set Oregon’s win total at 10.5, reflecting both the team’s recent consistency and the uncertainty surrounding its roster. The Ducks have hit double-digit wins every full season since 2019, establishing championship-level expectations.

“I also think 12-0 might happen again,” said Prehm. “They don’t play Ohio State. They don’t play Michigan. I honestly think the schedule sets up where if Dante Moore is as good as we think he is, the backend on defense connects maybe sooner than later.”

The Unfinished Business

Several questions remain unanswered as we head into 2025.

The most pressing concerns:

  • Quarterback depth behind Moore remains unproven
  • Secondary relies heavily on talented but inexperienced players
  • Special teams consistency (particularly kicking) wasn’t addressed
  • Veteran leadership must emerge from new voices

These aren’t fatal flaws—they’re growing pains for a program transitioning from breakthrough to sustained excellence.

Lightning Is About to Strike Again

Oregon enters 2025 with everything needed for another championship run.

The infrastructure is championship-caliber: elite recruiting, proven coaching, favorable schedule, and core talent returning at key positions. The expanded 12-team College Football Playoff provides multiple paths to postseason success.

The real question isn’t whether Oregon can compete—it’s whether they can elevate their ceiling even higher.

2024 proved Oregon belongs among college football’s elite. 2025 will determine if they’re ready to stay there permanently. With Dante Moore under center, Dakorien Moore stretching defenses, and Matayo Uiagalelei terrorizing quarterbacks, the pieces are in place for something special.

The championship window isn’t just open—it’s wide open.

No related posts found.

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES