Blog Article

Auburn Hired Alex Golesh For $42 Million. Here’s Why His 23-15 Record At USF Either Makes Him A Genius Bet Or Buyout #6

Mark Haines on December 15, 2025

Auburn just bet $42 million on an unproven offensive coordinator turned three-year Group of Five head coach.

The Tigers fired Hugh Freeze after five straight losing seasons. They handed the keys to Alex Golesh, a 39-year-old who went 23-15 at South Florida, has never coached a Power Four game as a head coach, and is now expected to compete weekly against Nick Saban disciples, Kirby Smart, and Lane Kiffin in the SEC. This is either the smartest process-driven hire Auburn has made in a decade, or another $15 million buyout waiting to happen in 2027.

Here’s what the data actually says about this hire.

The Résumé: Modest Numbers, Clear Trajectory

Golesh’s three-year record at USF tells two different stories depending on how you read it.

The raw numbers are underwhelming. His overall record sits at 23-15 with a 0.605 win percentage. His first two seasons produced identical 7-6 records that barely cleared the bowl-eligibility threshold. His home record (16-10) is solid but unspectacular; his away record (5-4) is merely competent; and his performance against ranked opponents (2-4) suggests he struggled against elite competition.

But the trajectory is what caught Auburn’s attention.

2023 SRS: -4.92 (below average)
2024 SRS: -2.55 (still below average)
2025 SRS: 12.54 (top-25 caliber)

That’s a 17.46-point improvement in the Simple Rating System over three years, one of the steepest climbs in college football during that span.

His 2025 season at USF was legitimately impressive. The Bulls went 9-3 with wins over Boise State and at Florida, climbed as high as 18th in the AP poll, and fielded an offense that ranked 2nd nationally in total offense (501.7 yards per game) and 4th in scoring (43.0 points per game). Quarterback Byrum Brown posted 3,158 passing yards and 1,008 rushing yards in the dual-threat role that has become Golesh’s offensive signature.

The problem?

That’s one season of elite performance against a schedule with a -0.88 strength of schedule rating.

What Auburn Needed vs What Auburn Got

Auburn’s offensive issues have been catastrophic for the past 6 years.

The Tigers have cycled through three different head coaches and multiple offensive coordinators without ever establishing a consistent offensive identity or developing a competent quarterback. Gus Malzahn’s final seasons became stagnant and predictable. Bryan Harsin brought complete dysfunction and zero recruiting momentum. Hugh Freeze delivered high-variance chaos, producing explosive moments but no sustainable success.

Golesh brings a clear offensive philosophy.

He helped build the tempo-based spread attacks at UCF and Tennessee that finished top-10 nationally in both scoring and total offense. At Tennessee, his offense set multiple school records. At USF, he developed Byrum Brown into one of the nation’s most dynamic dual-threat quarterbacks.

If you’re hiring for scheme and QB development, this makes perfect sense.

But if you’re hiring for proven SEC-level program management, this is a massive projection. Golesh has never recruited against Georgia and Alabama. He has never navigated the weekly defensive fronts that have defined the SEC for the last 20 years. He has never managed a roster with the depth and complexity required to survive a 12-game SEC gauntlet.

Auburn needed both offensive innovation and proven Power Four leadership.

They got the first part in spades.

The second part is purely aspirational.

The Risk: Power Four Proof Points Don’t Exist

This is where the pressure intensifies immediately.

Golesh has never been a head coach in a Power Four conference. His entire head coaching résumé consists of three years in the American Athletic Conference against schedules with an average strength of -3.09. His record against ranked opponents is 2-4, and those four losses came by an average margin of 18.5 points.

His biggest wins?

  • Home against Boise State
  • On the road at a 5-7 Florida team that fired Billy Napier mid-season

That’s not a knock on Golesh.

It’s just the reality that Auburn is asking him to make the largest jump any coach can make in college football: from three years of Group of Five success to immediately competing in the SEC where your margin for error is zero, and your schedule features six teams that could beat you by 30 if you’re not prepared.

The SEC has become a league where even veteran Power Four head coaches get fired after 18 months.

Auburn is betting that Golesh’s offensive acumen and program-building track record will translate immediately to a level he’s never experienced.

The Auburn Context: $70 Million in Buyouts Says This Better Work

Here’s what makes this hire especially high-pressure.

Auburn has spent approximately $60-70 million in head coaching buyouts since 2000, more than any program in college football.

The last three firings alone totaled roughly $52 million:

  • Gus Malzahn: $21.5 million
  • Bryan Harsin: $15.3 million
  • Hugh Freeze: $15.8 million

That’s generational wealth burned on coaches who didn’t work out, and now Auburn is paying $7+ million annually for a coach whose entire head coaching résumé would fit comfortably in the “Group of Five” section of any coaching database.

If you’re going to normalize eight-figure buyouts, the expectation is that you shop at the top shelf.

Established head coaches with multiple high-level seasons. Proven Power Four success. Résumés that justify the risk.

Instead, Auburn has now cycled through four completely different archetypes in 12 years:

  • A proven winner they fired too early (Malzahn)
  • An unproven outsider with zero recruiting ties (Harsin)
  • A baggage-laden reclamation project (Freeze)
  • A rising G5 schemer with offensive chops (Golesh)

That’s no coherent long-term hiring philosophy.

And the financial cost of that indecision is staggering.

Process Grade: Actually Better Than It Looks

Despite the risk, this hire scores well on process.

Athletic Director John Cohen made a coherent, data-driven choice instead of recycling a fired SEC name or chasing a splashy retread. He targeted a sitting head coach with proven rebuild capability (4-29 to 23-15 in three years), elite offensive credentials (top-5 nationally in 2025), modern QB development track record, and upward trajectory in his most recent season.

Cohen also retained DJ Durkin to maintain defensive continuity.

Durkin served as interim after Freeze and was in the mix for the full-time job. Keeping him on staff prevents a complete roster exodus during the transition and provides institutional knowledge that Golesh will desperately need during Year 1.

From a process standpoint, this is how you make a high-upside bet:

  1. Identify the deficiency (offense)
  2. Hire for the specific skill set needed (elite offensive coordinator turned successful G5 head coach)
  3. Structure the transition to minimize chaos (retain key staff, maintain recruiting relationships)

The problem is that “process” doesn’t guarantee results.

And Auburn’s margin for error with this hire is essentially zero.

The Verdict: High-Upside Bet With Existential Risk

If we’re grading this hire strictly on data and trajectory, here’s what the numbers say.

Process: B+ / A-

Auburn targeted a need and hired for scheme fit rather than recycling a known commodity. Cohen identified offensive dysfunction as the core problem and hired an elite offensive mind to fix it. The retention of Durkin shows strategic thinking about transition management.

Scheme Fit: A-

Golesh’s offensive identity directly addresses Auburn’s biggest weakness over the last six years. His track record of developing dual-threat quarterbacks and fielding top-10 offenses is exactly what Auburn needed after half a decade of offensive mediocrity.

Risk: High

No Power Four head coaching experience. Limited proof against elite competition. Stepping into a job where three straight coaches have been fired inside five years. The cultural and competitive jump from the American to the SEC is enormous, and Golesh has zero margin for error.

Ceiling: Top-15 program if the system scales

If Golesh’s tempo-based attack and QB development translate to the SEC, Auburn could legitimately compete for 9-10 wins annually within 2-3 years. The offensive system is proven at elite levels (UCF, Tennessee). The recruiting footprint favors Auburn. The resources are there to support sustained success.

Floor: Another expensive mistake

If the scheme doesn’t hold up against SEC defensive depth, the recruiting doesn’t scale, or the cultural pressure becomes overwhelming, this becomes buyout #6 in Auburn’s ongoing coaching experiment. The 23-15 record provides zero cushion for early struggles, and Auburn boosters have demonstrated they will not wait patiently for long-term development.

The data says this hire has real upside.

The 12.54 SRS in 2025 and the elite offensive profile suggest legitimate top-25 potential. But the question isn’t whether Golesh can succeed in theory.

The question is whether Auburn has the patience to let that upside develop.

The Pressure Timeline: Year 2 Is Make-or-Break

Auburn fans and boosters won’t wait long.

Year 1 (2025): 5-7 or 6-6 is acceptable as a “transition year”

The bar is low in Year 1 if the offense shows clear improvement and recruiting stays competitive. Auburn can sell the rebuild narrative for one season, especially if the offensive system produces explosive plays and Golesh identifies a long-term quarterback solution.

Year 2 (2026): 7-5 minimum, with at least one marquee win

This is where the expectations escalate dramatically. Auburn will need to see signs that the offensive system is scaling against SEC defenses. A marquee win over a ranked opponent becomes non-negotiable. Recruiting classes must stay in the top-20 nationally.

Anything less and the heat becomes unbearable.

Year 3 (2027): 8-4 or better, with a path to 9-3 if everything breaks right

This is the “prove it” year: either Auburn commits long-term or starts the buyout conversation. Golesh needs to show he can win consistently in the SEC, develop SEC-caliber players, and compete with the conference’s elite programs.

This is when the hire either validates the process or becomes another cautionary tale.

Golesh is walking into one of the three or four highest-pressure jobs in college football.

His margin for error is smaller than that of any first-time Power Four coach in recent memory.

Final Analysis

If you’re grading this hire for Coaches Hot Seat purposes, it’s a B/B+ on process and fit, but it carries existential risk because of Auburn’s history and the SEC’s unforgiving nature.

The upside is real.

The risk is massive.

And the pressure starts immediately.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

Jon Sumrall Has 3 Conference Titles And A 79.6% Win Rate. Here’s The Red Flag Buried In His Record That Could Doom Him In The SEC

Mark Haines on December 11, 2025

The Bottom Line

Jon Sumrall is a clear upgrade in process and upside over Billy Napier.

But whether he’s a true results upgrade in the SEC will hinge almost entirely on staff hires and whether he can translate his Group of Five discipline-and-physicality pitch into a cleaner, more explosive product than Napier ever managed in Gainesville. On résumé and trajectory, you can justify calling this a good, even ambitious, hire for Florida. But it lands with risk and fan skepticism because it looks, on the surface, like “Napier 2.0” from another G5 power.

Let’s dig into the data.

Résumé vs. Résumé

The surface-level comparison writes itself: Florida just fired a coach who went 22-23 over four years after a dominant G5 run, and replaced him with a coach who went 43-11 over four years during a dominant G5 run. But dig one layer deeper and meaningful distinctions emerge.

Sumrall has already won three conference championships – two Sun Belt titles at Troy and an American Athletic Conference title at Tulane – with Tulane appearing in the AAC title game again in 2025. He’s made a conference championship game in every season as a head coach. Napier never won a conference title at Florida and finished 12-16 in SEC play, with one 8-5 season sandwiched between losing years and no serious division contention.

Head-to-Head Coaching Records

On raw head-coaching record, championship appearances, and consistency, Sumrall’s four-year run is substantially stronger than Napier’s four years in Gainesville – and matches or exceeds what Napier did at Louisiana before he jumped to the SEC.

The Efficiency Profile: SRS & SOS Analysis

Simple Rating System (SRS) measures how many points better or worse a team is than average on a neutral field. Strength of Schedule (SOS) shows whether a team faced above-average or below-average competition. Together, they tell a clearer story than wins and losses alone.

What the Numbers Mean

Sumrall’s teams average an SRS of +7.56, while their SOS is -1.15. Translation: his programs consistently performed about a touchdown better than an average FBS team on a neutral field while playing slightly below-average schedules.

His best season by the metric was 2023 Troy at +10.29 SRS, with top-25-quality production on a clearly G5 schedule. His 2025 Tulane squad posted a +7.79 SRS against a +0.25 SOS, showing he can maintain strong efficiency even as the competition creeps toward truly average.

The Troy vs. Tulane split is telling. Troy under Sumrall averaged +8.36 SRS against a soft -1.82 SOS, the profile of a bully in a weak conference. Tulane under Sumrall averaged +6.76 SRS against a -0.48 SOS, reflecting a tougher AAC slate. Even there, 2025’s 11-2 with positive SOS suggests a team that would profile like a mid-tier SEC bowl squad.

The bottom line: Sumrall’s SRS/SOS profile says “very good G5 operator beating mostly average-or-worse schedules by real margins.” It’s a stronger and more consistent efficiency résumé than what Florida just fired. But nothing in that profile proves he can hit the +15 SRS territory you need to chase titles against an SEC-caliber schedule.

What the Film Says: A Defensive Identity with Pro-Style Offense

Film analysis by Max Browne, ESPN analyst and former USC/Pitt quarterback, who reviewed every Tulane sack, turnover, and touchdown pass from this season. [LINK]

Jon Sumrall played linebacker at Kentucky and has never held an offensive coaching position. His stops at San Diego, Tulane (as an assistant), Troy, Ole Miss, and Kentucky were all on defense. This matters because it defines his program’s DNA.

The Defensive Philosophy

Reviewing every sack and turnover from Tulane’s 2025 season reveals a consistent philosophy: trust your front four, don’t get cute.

Sumrall’s defenses aren’t exotic pressure teams. They rely on the defensive line to generate a pass rush through twist-and-stunt packages rather than bringing extra rushers from the secondary. When they do blitz, it’s typically a single linebacker from depth – rarely a safety or corner, and rarely multiple backers at once.

The results speak for themselves:

  • Both seasons at Troy: Top 10 nationally in scoring defense, allowing just 17.1 points per game
  • 2024 Tulane: 20.1 points per game allowed
  • 2025 Tulane: 22.8 points per game allowed
  • 2025 national rankings: 36th in sacks, 24th in turnovers

For Florida fans, there’s an upside and a downside to this approach. The upside: it’s not gimmicky or scheme-dependent—it’s about fundamentals and trusting your players to win their matchups. The downside: opposing quarterbacks won’t face exotic pressure packages that require extensive preparation. This is old-school, come-right-at-you defense.

The Offensive Identity

Sumrall’s offensive coordinator for the past four years has been Joe Craddock, who became the youngest OC in college football when SMU hired him in 2014 and later the youngest OC in the SEC at Arkansas. The Craddock-Sumrall partnership has produced a distinctive offensive identity.

Reviewing every touchdown pass from Darian Mensah (2024) and Jake Retzlaff (2025) reveals clear themes. This offense leans pro-style: under center, heavy play-action, attacking vertically with deep overs and posts. It’s a different family tree than Lane Kiffin’s Art Briles spread or Ben Arbuckle’s QB-run-heavy RPO system.

The signature concepts:

  • Play-action deep overs: Under center, big fake, receivers working across the field at depth
  • Vertical posts: Taking the top off the defense, especially with Retzlaff in 2025 (4-5 touchdowns on identical pistol-formation deep post concepts)
  • Tight end integration: Motions, flat routes, and seam threats creating coverage conflicts

Notably, this system shares DNA with what DJ Lagway ran at Florida last year, pro-style play-action with vertical concepts. That’s a potential recruiting pitch: “We’re not asking you to learn something completely different.”

There’s nothing in this offensive film that won’t translate to the SEC. But it requires talent, particularly speed on the perimeter and a quarterback who can make deep throws off play-action. Florida has historically recruited that speed. Whether Sumrall retains the quarterback to run it is another question.

Where the Upgrade Is Real

  • Higher ceiling and week-to-week consistency: Four straight league title game appearances, multiple championships, and a dominant late-season record (11-4 in October through December). Napier’s Florida teams faded down the stretch (5-7 late season).
  • Proven program flipper: Sumrall rapidly turned around two different programs (Troy and Tulane) rather than just sustaining one build. Napier’s Louisiana success was about maintaining what he inherited.
  • Philosophical clarity: In his introductory press conference, Sumrall explicitly said that “having an explosive offense isn’t optional, it’s mandatory” at Florida. That acknowledgment of program-specific expectations is something Napier never clearly articulated.
  • Reputation as a relationship builder: Analysts consistently describe Sumrall as someone who connects with players and gets the most out of his roster. His handling of the Tulane transition, promising not to poach players, earned praise for character and loyalty.

Where the Upgrade Is Fragile

  • No Power-2 head coaching experience: Like Napier, Sumrall has never run a Power-conference program. The question isn’t whether he can win, it’s whether his model scales to SEC resources, NIL battles, and overlapping expectations with Georgia and FSU.
  • Napier’s failure wasn’t just about his résumé: The Billy Napier experiment collapsed because of in-game management, special teams breakdowns, discipline issues, and confusion about offensive identity, not because he came from the Sun Belt. Sumrall’s margin to be an upgrade depends on avoiding those same organizational failures.
  • Soft schedule strength: Sumrall’s career SOS of -1.15 means he hasn’t lived in a top-10 schedule world where +7 or +8 SRS is table stakes just to finish 9-3. The SEC will be a different animal.
  • The optics problem: Florida ended up on Sumrall after publicly chasing Lane Kiffin. That “pivot after a miss” narrative is driving fan frustration and the “settled for another G5 guy” perception, regardless of Sumrall’s actual qualifications.
  • A persistent penalty problem: Sumrall’s 2025 Tulane squad ranks 113th nationally in penalties per game (7.2), the bottom quartile in FBS. That’s not a one-year blip; his teams have consistently ranked in the middle-to-bottom third in penalty discipline. Sloppy procedural penalties, late hits, and undisciplined play are survivable against G5 competition. Against SEC defenses and hostile road environments, those self-inflicted wounds become drive-killers and game-changers. If Sumrall can’t clean up the penalty margin, the physicality he sells will look more like undisciplined football than tough football.

The Verdict

Jon Sumrall represents a meaningful résumé upgrade over Billy Napier with a higher win percentage, more championships, better late-season performance, and demonstrated ability to flip multiple programs quickly.

But this is not a “home-run SEC proven commodity” hire. It’s a higher-upside reroll of the identical dice with a coach whose winning profile and multi-school turnarounds give Florida more justification than they had with Napier in 2021.

The defensive identity is sound and translatable. The offensive philosophy fits what Florida has run. The staff hires, particularly whether Craddock comes along or whether Florida pursues a bigger name at OC, will determine the ceiling. (Sumrall has hired Buster Faulkner, currently the offensive coordinator at Georgia Tech, as the Gators’ new offensive coordinator. This move brings an experienced play-caller to run an explosive offense for quarterback DJ Lagway. Faulkner previously coached quarterbacks at Georgia and has a strong background in offensive schemes.)

Our assessment: Good but risky hire. Sumrall is better positioned to stabilize Florida above the 6-8 win purgatory Napier lived in. Whether he can push into consistent 9-10 win territory against SEC competition remains an open question, one that won’t be answered until we see how the model translates to Power-conference resources, expectations, and schedule strength.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

Ryan Silverfield Is 3-12 On The Road Against Winning Teams. Arkansas Just Asked Him To Win At Georgia, LSU, Texas, And Texas A&M.

Mark Haines on December 10, 2025

Ryan Silverfield is a high-floor stabilizer hire for Arkansas.

He’ll almost certainly get the Razorbacks back to bowl eligibility and competent, week-in/week-out SEC football. His Memphis track record – 50-25, bowl games every year, back-to-back double-digit-win seasons – shows he knows how to build and maintain a program.

But nothing in his profile screams “SEC title contender.” And the data suggests Arkansas just hired a coach whose ceiling is 7-8 wins in a league where that gets you fired.

The Numbers

Silverfield’s career record looks solid on the surface. But the splits tell a different story.

Silverfield at Memphis (Career)

The bowl record is perfect. The late-season numbers are strong. But look at the bottom row: 2-4 against ranked teams. That’s a .333 win rate when games matter most.

The Schedule Cliff

This is where the data gets uncomfortable. Every single season at Memphis, Silverfield coached against a negative strength of schedule. Every season at Arkansas – even in Pittman’s worst years – featured a positive.

Strength of Schedule Comparison

That’s an 8-10 point swing in schedule difficulty. Silverfield has never navigated a positive strength of schedule. Now he walks into the SEC West, where Georgia, LSU, Tennessee, Texas, and Texas A&M are all on the schedule.

He won .677 against weak competition. What happens when every week is a test?

The AAC Problem

Here’s the detail that haunts this hire: Silverfield never won an AAC Championship.

Mike Norvell won one before leaving for Florida State. Silverfield inherited a stable program with solid G5 resources and continuity, and never broke through. His best teams (2023, 2024) finished 6-2 in conference play both years. Good. Not great. Never the best.

That hints at a coach who reliably gets you to “good and organized” but hasn’t shown evidence of consistently punching above his resource level. In the AAC, that meant no title. In the SEC, it likely means a ceiling of 7-8 wins.

The Fan Reaction

Arkansas fans didn’t just express disappointment. They protested.

Razorback fans organized an on-campus protest at the Jones Center the day the hire became public—a rarity even by SEC drama standards. Social media reaction was brutal: “Such a 6-7 hire” became the instant meme. National observers piled on. Rival fanbases mocked the move.

The core complaints:

  • Going 8-4 in the AAC gets you an SEC job?
  • Memphis never won a conference title under Silverfield despite strong resources
  • Memphis fans openly celebrated his departure—and that’s who Arkansas hired?
  • Yurachek asked for major booster commitments, missed on bigger targets, then settled late

Compare this to James Franklin at Virginia Tech: protests = zero, fan sentiment = cautiously optimistic, narrative = “boss move.” Silverfield walks into Fayetteville with the shortest leash of any new hire in this cycle.

The Memphis Tell

Want to know what Memphis fans think? They’re celebrating.

Local Memphis media describe Tiger fans as “relieved” Silverfield left on his own rather than forcing an awkward firing decision. Message board comparisons to Josh Pastner – likable, professional, solid floor, limited ceiling – capture the mood perfectly.

The Memphis framing: “Good man, good coach, but not the guy to take us to the next level.” When your own fanbase is thanking you for leaving, that’s a data point.

The Bottom Line

Silverfield’s realistic outcome at Arkansas:

  • Years 1-2: 6-7 wins, bowl eligibility, stabilized culture
  • Years 3-4: 7-8 wins with an occasional shot at 9 if the schedule breaks right
  • Ceiling: Occasional 8-9 win seasons; unlikely to be a consistent SEC contender

That makes him a defensible hire for an AD who wanted stability and professionalism after the Pittman disaster. But it also explains why the reception has been so harsh, and why this move will be judged harshly if the on-field turnaround isn’t obvious by Year 2.

High floor. Low ceiling. Short leash.

Arkansas traded the uncertainty of another developmental hire for a known quantity. The problem is, everyone knows what that quantity is, and the SEC doesn’t grade on a curve.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

Grading the Carousel: Preliminary Hire Grades for the 2024-25 Cycle

Mark Haines on December 3, 2025

The carousel never stops spinning.

We’re tracking 21 coaching changes this cycle — 13 with new coaches already named, 8 still waiting on their guy. What follows are our preliminary grades across three categories: Hire Quality, Process, and Fan/Media Sentiment.

These aren’t final verdicts.

They’re initial reactions. First impressions. The kind of grades that will look either brilliant or idiotic in three years when we revisit them.

We’ll do deep dives on each hire individually in the coming weeks. But for now, here’s where every job stands — from the home runs to the dumpster fires.

The Home Runs

These programs swung big and connected.

Virginia Tech — James Franklin (A / A– / A)

The Hokies didn’t just make a hire. They made a statement.

Landing James Franklin from Penn State signals that Virginia Tech is done being a sleeping giant. The staff and recruiting implications will ripple through the ACC for years. The only question now is whether VT finally acts like the resource program it’s always claimed to be.

How his Penn State staff/recruits follow, what this does to the ACC power structure, and whether VT is finally acting like a “resource program” again.

Oregon State — JaMarcus Shephard (A / A– / A)

The Beavers landed their guy without a nationwide circus.

JaMarcus Shephard comes from Alabama’s staff into the most uncertain moment in Oregon State history. Post-realignment survival depends on portal management and identity preservation. A first-time head coach navigating conference limbo while maintaining Trent Bray’s defensive DNA is a tall order — but OSU handled this search like a program that knows exactly who it is.

Post-realignment survival, recruiting without a stable league home, and whether a first-time HC can maintain Bray’s defensive identity.

LSU — Lane Kiffin (A / D / A)

The hire is an A. The process was a circus.

Lane Kiffin to LSU was the worst-kept secret in college football, which made the public courtship even messier. But the end result? A program with unlimited resources landing one of the sport’s best offensive minds and most ruthless recruiters. The marriage either produces championships or a spectacular implosion. There is no middle ground in Baton Rouge.

Ole Miss fallout, staff poaching wars, and if LSU’s booster culture amplifies or burns out Kiffin’s volatility in a hurry.

Colorado State — Jim Mora Jr. (A / B / B+)

The Mountain West needed a credible name. CSU delivered.

Jim Mora brings NFL pedigree, P4 experience, and a recruiting network that Jay Norvell never fully activated. The question is whether this is a “last tour” victory lap or a legitimate rebuild. Either way, CSU positioned itself to capitalize on a weakened conference landscape.

Can Mora still grind on the trail, how CSU positions itself vs. a weakened MWC, and whether this is a “last tour” or a true rebuild.

Kentucky — Will Stein (A / B– / B)

Mark Stoops cast a long shadow. Will Stein steps into it confidently.

The offensive identity pivot is exactly what Kentucky needed after years of defensive-first football. Stein’s explosiveness ceiling could push the Wildcats from the 7-win band into genuine SEC East contention. The NIL landscape remains a challenge, but this hire signals ambition.

Stoops’ shadow, offensive identity pivot, NIL vs. league peers, and whether Stein can keep Kentucky in the 7–9 win band with a higher explosiveness ceiling.

Auburn — Alex Golesh (A– / B+ / B+)

Auburn got its tempo guy, Alex Golesh, from South Florida.

Golesh’s USF offense translated well enough to earn him a shot at the SEC’s toughest division. The patience level in Auburn is… historically nonexistent. But the process was clean, the hire was decisive, and line-of-scrimmage recruiting will determine whether this becomes a home run or a cautionary tale.

Translation of his USF tempo offense to the SEC West equivalent, patience level in Auburn, and how he recruits the lines of scrimmage.

The Solid Singles

Not flashy. Not embarrassing. Just… fine.

Stanford — Tavita Pritchard (B+ / B / B)

The Cardinal went internal and pragmatic.

Tavita Pritchard inherits Andrew Luck’s GM involvement and Stanford’s perpetual NIL/admissions constraints. The bet is that an NFL-style QB room can overcome portal friction in an ACC that doesn’t care about your academic reputation. It’s a reasonable swing given the circumstances.

Andrew Luck’s GM role, Stanford’s NIL constraints, and whether an NFL-style QB room can overcome admissions/portal friction in the ACC.

UCLA — Bob Chesney (B+ / C / C+)

This is either the next Kalen DeBoer or bargain shopping.

Bob Chesney’s jump from FCS to the Big Ten grind is significant. Here’s the strange part: the process was actually solid — because Martin Jarmond wasn’t running it. And that tells you everything about the real red flags at this job. An ineffective, egomaniacal athletic director. A disconnected, tone-deaf chancellor. A bean counter who only understands counting beans. Chesney’s system might translate just fine. Whether anyone can succeed under this administration is the bigger question.

The massive jump from FCS to the Big Ten grind, and whether anyone can succeed under an ineffective AD, a tone-deaf chancellor, and an administration that only understands counting beans.

Oklahoma State — Eric Morris (B– / B– / B–)

Life after Gundy is officially here.

Eric Morris keeps the Air Raid DNA without the 20-year cultural infrastructure. The question is whether Oklahoma State wants to chase Big 12 titles or just stability. This hire suggests stability. That’s not necessarily wrong — but it’s not inspiring either.

Life after Gundy’s long tenure, keeping the Air Raid DNA without the old culture, and whether OSU wants to chase Big 12 titles or just stability.

Ole Miss — Pete Golding (B / C+ / B)

Continuity hire. Full stop.

Pete Golding’s job is to keep the portal from hemorrhaging and maintain defensive credibility while the offense finds a new identity post-Kiffin. Whether he can be more than a recruiter/DC remains the central question. The Rebels are betting on stability over splash.

Defensive continuity vs. offensive identity change, portal retention after Kiffin, and whether Golding can be more than a recruiter/DC.

Michigan State — Pat Fitzgerald (C / B / B)

The Spartans hired a culture reset.

After back-to-back scandals, Pat Fitzgerald’s “Northwestern-style overachiever” ceiling might be exactly what East Lansing needs. The long-term recruiting upside against Ohio State and Michigan is… limited. But the hire makes sense for a program that desperately needed adults in the room.

Cultural cleanup after back-to-back scandals, ceiling of “Northwestern-style overachiever” in the new Big Ten, and long-term recruiting upside vs. Ohio State/Michigan.

The Fan Base Meltdowns

These aren’t going well.

Florida — Jon Sumrall (C / B+ / D)

The process was fine. The reaction was not.

Sumrall arrives with Steve Spurrier’s public blessing and a mandate to fix Billy Napier’s in-game disasters. But there’s a red flag worth noting: Sumrall’s Tulane teams were consistently among the most penalized in the country — the kind of undisciplined football that suggests coaching issues, not just player mistakes. Florida fans already wanted a bigger name. The D in sentiment reflects a fan base that feels the program settled.

Spurrier publicly blessing the hire, fixing Napier’s in-game messes, and whether Sumrall can weaponize UF’s NIL/portal machine fast enough in the SEC arms race.

Arkansas — Ryan Silverfield (D+ / D / D)

This is a disaster.

The fan backlash isn’t simmering — it’s boiling over into organized protests. Ryan Silverfield’s task is nearly impossible: win quickly in a 16-team SEC with a hostile home base from Day 1. The AD’s survival odds are now directly tied to Silverfield’s record. D across the board, and that might be generous.

Fan backlash/protests, AD survival odds, and if Silverfield can win quickly enough in the new 16-team SEC to quiet a hostile base.

The Clown Shows

No other way to describe these.

Penn State — TBD (INC / F / F)

The Nittany Lions are bleeding.

James Franklin is gone. The portal is circling. And Penn State is playing leverage games with agents while their roster evaporates in real time. At some point, “waiting for the right guy” becomes “watching your program collapse.” That point may have already passed.

Whether PSU finally swings for a top-5 coach, how Sexton’s leverage games play out, and how long they can sit in limbo without bleeding portal talent.

UAB — TBD (INC / F / F)

The Bill Clark era feels like ancient history now.

Former coach Trent Dilfer gets plenty of blame, but AD Mark Ingram deserves more. Together they torched everything Clark built — the goodwill, the culture, the upward trajectory. All of it gone. Now the job sits open and nobody wants it. This isn’t a “hidden gem” search. It’s a punchline. Stadium and resources exist on paper, but the dysfunction has made this one of the least attractive openings in the country.

How attractive the job really is post-Dilfer, stadium/resources vs. recent chaos, and whether UAB leans into offense again or buys a culture guy.

Still on the Board

These jobs remain open. Grades pending.

California (INC / B / B) — Cal’s identity crisis continues. Do they want academics or football? The ACC move demands an answer.

UConn (INC / C+ / C) — Independence is lonely. The next hire determines whether UConn commits to regional recruiting or another failed “national” vision.

North Texas (INC / C / C) — Serial resets in Denton. UNT needs to pick an offensive identity and stick with it.

Coastal Carolina (INC / B– / B–) — The post-Chadwell slump continues. Another spread-option innovator, or something different?

South Florida (INC / B / B) — Golesh left equity in the roster. USF has a window before FSU/UF/Miami clean up their messes.

Memphis (INC / B / B) — The Tigers launch coaches. The question is whether they want another launchpad guy or someone who stays.

The Bottom Line

Thirteen hires graded. Eight more coming.

The best hire so far? Virginia Tech landing James Franklin changes the ACC. The worst situation? Arkansas — and it’s not close.

We’ll revisit these grades in-season. Some will age like wine. Others will age like milk.

The carousel keeps spinning.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

COACHES HOT SEAT: WEEK 13 RANKINGS

Mark Haines on November 18, 2025

The clock just hit midnight on college football’s struggling coaches.

No more “next year” promises. No more “we’re close” platitudes. Week 12 stripped away the illusions and exposed the reality: some programs are moving forward, and others are circling the drain.

Jonathan Smith is 0-7 in Big Ten play. Shane Beamer blew a 27-point halftime lead in the most catastrophic collapse of the season. Mike Norvell’s Florida State is 2-12 in ACC games over two years. Bill Belichick is 0-5 against Power Four opponents in his first college season.

Athletic directors are done selling hope to angry donors. Boosters are done writing checks for mediocrity. The portal opens in three weeks, and players are already making decisions about their futures.

This is where coaching careers get defined—or destroyed.

Here are the ten coaches who entered Week 12 with everything to prove and nothing left to hide behind.

1. Jonathan Smith – Michigan State Spartans (3-7, 0-7 Big Ten)

Jonathan Smith’s seat isn’t just hot anymore. It’s molten.

Michigan State lost to Penn State 28-10 at home Saturday, marking their seventh straight defeat and officially eliminating the Spartans from bowl eligibility. That’s four consecutive seasons without a bowl game and an 0-7 Big Ten record that has Smith at 8-12 overall since arriving from Oregon State.

The numbers: Michigan State owes Smith approximately $32-33 million if they fire him now. That’s one of the most expensive buyouts in the Big Ten. However, the AD and university president, both hired after Smith arrived, have no strong ties to him and are facing mounting pressure to act.

National media outlets universally place Smith at the top of coaching hot seat lists. Fan sentiment has turned nearly uniform in calling for a change. Replacement candidate discussions are already widespread.

Smith will almost certainly coach Michigan State’s final two games, but barring a miracle turnaround, he’s coaching for his next job, not this one.

2. Mike Locksley – Maryland Terrapins (4-6, 1-6 Big Ten)

Mike Locksley just got saved by the very problem that’s destroying college football programs: money.

Maryland announced Sunday that Locksley will return for 2026 despite a six-game losing streak that dropped the Terrapins from 4-0 to 4-6. It’s the second straight season with only one Big Ten win and the 11th consecutive losing season in conference play. Locksley is now 37-47 overall at Maryland and 17-46 in Big Ten games since 2019.

Athletic Director Jim Smith made the decision based on financial reality. Maryland’s athletic department has lost $32.7 million over the past five years. Locksley’s buyout would be $13.4 million. Smith told ESPN the school is “better off pouring already-spent money into building the roster than into bringing in a new coaching staff.”

Translation: We can’t afford to fire him.

The announcement came after “Fire Locksley” chants broke out in the student section during the Indiana game. Locksley’s pressure doesn’t disappear just because he’s surviving 2025. He’s coaching on borrowed time in 2026, and everyone knows it.

3. Shane Beamer – South Carolina Gamecocks (3-7, 1-7 SEC)

Shane Beamer just orchestrated the most spectacular coaching collapse of the 2025 season.

Saturday at Texas A&M, South Carolina led 30-3 at halftime. Then came the second half. Texas A&M scored 28 unanswered points. South Carolina was shut out and managed just 76 total yards after halftime. Final score: 31-30, Aggies. It was the largest comeback in Texas A&M program history.

ESPN’s Paul Finebaum summed it up perfectly: “Shane Beamer right now just looks like a loser.”

South Carolina is now 3-7 and guaranteed a losing season. They’ve lost five straight SEC games and will miss a bowl game for the first time under Beamer. “Fire Beamer” chants have replaced the cheers.

Here’s the financial nightmare: South Carolina extended Beamer through 2030 less than a year ago. His buyout is approximately $27.9 million. Athletic Director Jeremiah Donati is now stuck with one of college football’s most expensive mistakes.

This type of historic collapse changes everything. It’s not just that they lost. It’s HOW they lost.

4. Mike Norvell – Florida State Seminoles (5-5, 2-5 ACC)

Mike Norvell just won a game and it doesn’t matter.

Florida State beat Virginia Tech 34-14 Saturday to improve to 5-5, but the win came against a 3-7 Hokies team that’s almost as bad as the Seminoles. Since being controversially left out of the 2023 College Football Playoff at 13-0, Florida State is 7-15 overall and 2-12 in ACC play.

Athletic Director Michael Alford announced in October that Norvell would remain through the end of 2025, but promised a “comprehensive assessment” after the season. Translation: Norvell is coaching his final games at Florida State.

Here’s why the delay: Money. Norvell’s buyout is approximately $53.3 million after this season. It’s the second-largest buyout in college football history.

Norvell has tried to project confidence, delivering a six-minute “championship expectation” rant recently. The problem is the results. FSU is winless on the road this season and hasn’t won a road game since November 2023.

5. Derek Mason – Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders (2-8, 1-5 Conference USA)

Derek Mason took a sabbatical from coaching after the 2022 season to rest, reflect, and spend time with family.

He should have stayed on sabbatical.

Mason is in his second season at Middle Tennessee and the program has regressed under his leadership. The Blue Raiders went 3-9 in his first year, and they’re currently 2-8 in 2025. That’s 5-17 overall and 3-11 in conference play across two seasons.

Mason replaced Rick Stockstill, who went 113-111 over 18 seasons with 10 bowl appearances. Mason hasn’t come close to matching that standard. Middle Tennessee’s two wins this season came against FCS opponents. Every FBS opponent has beaten them, often badly.

The defense, which should be Mason’s calling card, ranks among the worst in all of college football. Mason’s overall head coaching record is now 30-64 across eight years. At some point, MTSU has to ask if this experiment is worth continuing.

6. Dave Aranda – Baylor Bears (5-5, 3-4 Big 12)

Dave Aranda isn’t getting fired this season, but not for the reasons you’d hope.

After Saturday’s 55-28 home humiliation against Utah, Aranda sits at 5-5 overall and desperately needs one win in the final two games to make a bowl. His defense ranks second-worst in the Big 12 in both scoring and rush defense. For a defensive specialist hired specifically for his defensive expertise, that’s a damning indictment.

Here’s the number that matters most: 21-25. That’s Aranda’s record at Baylor with his own recruits, excluding the COVID season and the 2021 championship season built on Matt Rhule’s inherited roster.

However, Aranda is still employed because athletic director Mack Rhoades took a leave of absence November 12 amid an ongoing investigation. Interim ADs don’t make coaching changes of this magnitude.

It’s not merit. It’s institutional paralysis.

7. Luke Fickell – Wisconsin Badgers (5-6, 3-5 Big Ten)

Luke Fickell went from College Football Playoff coach to coaching for his job in three years.

After leading Cincinnati to the CFP in 2021, Fickell was hired by Wisconsin with enormous expectations. Instead, Wisconsin has regressed. Fickell is now 16-19 overall at Wisconsin and 9-15 in Big Ten play. His teams have produced losing records in two of three full seasons.

The Badgers went scoreless in back-to-back games against Iowa and Ohio State earlier this season, marking the first time that has happened since 1977. Wisconsin hasn’t won a Big Ten home game in over a calendar year.

Here’s the ironic twist: Fickell just received a contract extension through 2032 and a public vote of confidence from AD Chris McIntosh. His buyout is estimated to be around $27.5 million.

Wisconsin is on track for its second straight losing season after 22 consecutive bowl appearances. Fickell gets 2026 to prove he can turn it around, but the pressure will be immense from Day One.

8. Bill Belichick – North Carolina Tar Heels (4-6, 2-4 ACC)

The greatest football coach in history is learning that college football is a different game.

Bill Belichick, winner of six Super Bowls with the Patriots, arrived at North Carolina with enormous fanfare. Instead, he’s 4-6 overall and 0-5 against Power Four opponents. UNC’s losses weren’t just defeats. They were blowouts that exposed fundamental problems with Belichick’s transition to college football.

“It’s an unstructured mess,” a source told WRAL News in October. Reports emerged that Belichick hadn’t “had a conversation with most of the guys on defense.” The Tar Heels rank last in the ACC in total offense and scoring.

At 72 years old, in his first college job ever, Belichick is discovering that recruiting 18-year-olds, managing NIL, and coaching the portal era requires skills he never needed in the NFL.

UNC’s administration sold fans on Belichick, leading them to the playoffs. Instead, they’re fighting for bowl eligibility and dealing with reports of organizational chaos.

9. Justin Wilcox – California Golden Bears (6-4, 3-3 ACC)

Justin Wilcox sits at 6-4 overall and 3-3 in ACC play, a respectable first season navigating conference realignment.

But the pressure has never been higher.

Fan sentiment has turned decisively against Wilcox, with widespread calls for his dismissal dominating the Cal community. This isn’t about the record. It’s about nine years of incremental progress that never accumulates into sustained success.

Then there’s Ron Rivera. Cal’s new General Manager has given Wilcox conditional support, stating that “another victory or two” in the final stretch will be key in determining his future. That’s not a vote of confidence. That’s measured pressure from above.

When your GM says your fate depends on winning one or two games in a 6-4 season, you’re coaching under scrutiny from fans who’ve already moved on and leadership that’s watching closely.

10. Mark Stoops – Kentucky Wildcats (5-5, 2-5 SEC)

Mark Stoops just beat Tennessee Tech 42-10 Saturday, extending Kentucky’s winning streak to four games.

And his pressure level hasn’t budged an inch.

The win over an FCS opponent was expected, and while Stoops praised “this team’s attitude and effort,” beating Tennessee Tech doesn’t change the fundamental calculus around his job security. Fan sentiment remains sharply divided.

What protects Stoops isn’t the four-game winning streak. It’s the $40.5 million buyout that must be paid in full within 60 days if he’s fired. After critical wins at Auburn and over Florida, AD Mitch Barnhart voiced full support, saying Kentucky is “taking steps” back up the mountain.

Kentucky sits one win away from bowl eligibility with two games remaining. The pressure at #10 reflects this: the four-game streak has eased the immediate crisis, but beating an FCS team doesn’t resolve long-term doubts.

WANT TO SEE WHERE YOUR COACH RANKS?

The top 10 are racing against the clock.

But coaching pressure doesn’t stop at #10. A $40.5 million buyout protects Mark Stoops (#10) despite 13 years of middling results. Justin Wilcox (#9) is 6-4 but facing conditional support from his GM. Luke Fickell (#7) just got extended through 2032 despite losing 9 of his last 14 games.

Every FBS coach is ranked based on actual pressure, not speculation about who might be fired.

Subscribers to our newsletter get the full story. Each week, you’ll receive comprehensive profiles of all the top 10 coaches with contract details, buyout numbers, replacement candidates, and insider analysis you won’t find anywhere else. Additionally, our weekly Hot Seat Deep Dive provides an in-depth examination of one coach’s situation. This week: Dave Aranda at Baylor – how administrative chaos became a coaching lifeline, and why institutional paralysis might be the only thing keeping him employed.

Subscribe here to get the complete analysis delivered to your inbox every week.

Want to know where your coach stands? View rankings of all 136 FBS coaches.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

Week 12 Coaches Hot Seat Rankings

Mark Haines on November 10, 2025

Week 11 exposed the pretenders. Week 12 eliminates them. This is the part of the season where athletic directors stop debating and start deciding. Where donor patience either holds or shatters entirely. Where recruits make final judgments about which programs are ascending and which are circling the drain. The “we’re close to turning the corner” narrative that might have worked in October doesn’t survive November. By Week 12, you either have tangible proof of progress or you’re staring at an offseason coaching search. Buyout conversations move from theoretical to tactical. Board meetings shift from “let’s give him more time” to “what’s our exit strategy?” Week 12 separates the coaches who survive the season from those who won’t make it to December. And for these ten coaches? The clock is ticking louder than ever.

1. Jonathan Smith, Michigan State

Jonathan Smith remains at #1, and the situation in East Lansing has moved from crisis to terminal. The $33M+ buyout that once seemed prohibitive is now just a number that major donors are actively working to fund. His 8-13 record isn’t just bad, it’s a complete program collapse that’s destroying Michigan State’s identity. New AD J Batt inherited this disaster and faces mounting pressure to act. Recruiting has gone from struggling to nonexistent, with elite prospects avoiding East Lansing entirely. The fan base has moved past anger into total apathy, which is the real death sentence. The question isn’t whether Smith gets fired, it’s when.

2. Mike Locksley, Maryland

Mike Locksley holds at #2, but that strong 2025 recruiting class that was his lifeline is starting to crack. Commits are taking visits elsewhere, and the locker room remains completely fractured. His 37-46 overall record tells the story of six years without real progress in the Big Ten. Fourth quarter collapses continue, and fans have stopped showing up expecting anything different. Donor support has evaporated completely, with major boosters now openly discussing replacement options. The administration’s hesitation is about the competitive coaching market, not confidence in Locksley. One more collapse and it’s over.

3. Mike Norvell, Florida State

Mike Norvell stays at #3, still clinging to the thin margin of player support that’s kept him employed. The $55M+ buyout remains the primary obstacle, but FSU is already planning for 2026 when it becomes more manageable. His 37-32 record would be fine elsewhere, but FSU expects championships, not mediocrity. Fan skepticism continues to grow as the season progresses. That Wake Forest win bought time, but not much. Another embarrassing loss puts him right back at #1.

4. Derek Mason, Middle Tennessee

Derek Mason enters the Top 10 at #4 with a catastrophic 4-17 record over two seasons. This is complete program collapse, not a rebuilding project. His SEC pedigree from Vanderbilt hasn’t translated, and the offense ranks near the bottom nationally. Donor support is gone, attendance at Floyd Stadium is embarrassing, and recruiting is nonexistent. Elite Conference USA prospects are choosing other programs because nobody wants to commit to obvious instability. The administration is trapped between Mason’s contract and the reality that every game does more damage. This isn’t a hot seat, it’s a death watch.

5. Luke Fickell, Wisconsin

Luke Fickell drops to #5, but the heat hasn’t decreased at all. All the goodwill from Cincinnati is completely gone after a 16-19 start in Madison. Wisconsin fans are openly questioning whether hiring Fickell was a massive mistake. The offense looks lost, the defense looks confused, and the administration’s demands for “foundational change” are ultimatums, not suggestions. Recruiting has flatlined, with elite Midwest prospects now choosing programs like Iowa and Minnesota over Wisconsin. Donors are calculating buyout scenarios and floating replacement names. His $7.625M salary looked smart when everyone expected success. Now it looks like an expensive anchor.

6. Justin Wilcox, California

Justin Wilcox remains at #6 as Cal’s situation reaches existential crisis levels. Nine years and a 48-54 record, with the ACC move exposing every weakness instead of creating opportunities. Fourth quarter collapses define the program now, and fans plan around expecting defeat. The real crisis is financial, donors have completely checked out and stopped funding the program. Recruiting has stagnated to the point where Cal loses battles to Mountain West schools. The administration isn’t asking whether to fire Wilcox anymore. They’re asking bigger questions about whether Cal football at this level is sustainable. That’s far more dangerous.

7. Bill Belichick, North Carolina

Bill Belichick at #7 represents the most stunning collapse of expectations in college football. Six Super Bowl rings have produced a 4-5 record that has fans mocking a hire they celebrated months ago. One Power Four win, uncertain bowl eligibility, and a coaching style built for NFL professionals that doesn’t work with teenagers. Elite recruits visit once and immediately look elsewhere. His $10M salary looked brilliant when everyone expected immediate success, now it prevents necessary program investments. The administration is losing patience and credibility with donors who expected a revolution. Every game does more recruiting damage. The experiment is failing in real time.

8. Shane Beamer, South Carolina

Shane Beamer drops to #8 after mid-season coordinator firings that were pure desperation. His 32-28 record looks fine until you remember South Carolina expects SEC competitiveness, not fighting for bowl eligibility. The firings bought time but fixed nothing fundamental. Bowl eligibility has moved from goal to survival requirement, the minimum needed to keep his job. Booster support is now conditional, demanding actual results instead of energy and South Carolina ties. Recruiting is suffering as elite prospects watch the chaos and commit elsewhere. The administration has loaded the gun. Anything less than a bowl game and he’s done.

9. Dave Aranda, Baylor

Dave Aranda falls to #9, and the shine from that 2021 Big 12 Championship has completely worn off. His 36-34 record through six seasons isn’t disastrous, it’s just deeply uninspiring for a program that expects more. Aranda wins just enough games to avoid the hot seat entirely, but never enough to generate real momentum or championship buzz. The fan base has moved from “trust the process” to “what exactly is the process?” as another mediocre season unfolds. Recruiting has slowed as elite Texas prospects look for programs with clearer upward trajectories. Aranda’s defensive expertise was supposed to be the foundation for sustained success, but it hasn’t translated into consistent winning. The remaining games will determine whether Baylor sees enough to commit long-term or starts exploring other options.

10. Mark Stoops, Kentucky

Mark Stoops barely holds #10 after one Auburn win bought temporary relief from what felt like inevitable disaster. His 81-78 record through 13 seasons is both Kentucky’s most successful era ever and clear evidence of a program that’s hit its ceiling. Multi-year SEC losing streaks and repeated blowouts have created frustration throughout the program. The real problem? Kentucky would owe Stoops nearly $38 million if they fired him after this season, and the contract requires the full amount be paid within 60 days. That’s not just expensive, it’s functionally impossible for Kentucky’s athletic budget. Stoops is essentially untouchable no matter how the season ends. The remaining games aren’t about his job security, they’re about whether another year of known limitations is acceptable. Thirteen years of evidence suggests he’s taken Kentucky as far as he can.

Want the full story on every coaching hot seat in America?

Newsletter subscribers get the expanded treatment, deep dives on each of the top 10 coaches, game previews that actually matter, and curated stories about coaching moves and timely college football topics delivered straight to their inbox every Tuesday and Friday during the season. Tuesdays bring you the updated rankings with insider analysis on who’s rising and falling. Fridays give you the weekend preview, breaking down which coaches are coaching for their jobs in the games that matter most. No fluff. No filler. Just the insider information you need to stay ahead of the coaching carousel before it becomes headlines everywhere else. This isn’t just another college football newsletter, it’s your edge on understanding the power dynamics, buyout negotiations, and behind-the-scenes pressure that determines who stays and who goes. Subscribe here and get the complete picture twice a week.

Where does your coach rank this week? Check out the full rankings HERE.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

Week 11 – Coaches Hot Seat Rankings

Mark Haines on November 4, 2025

Week 11 is where the pretenders get exposed.

This is the part of the season where the rubber meets the road. Where your team and your staff prove they’ve “got it” – or don’t. The early-season excuses are gone. The “we’re still figuring things out” narrative doesn’t fly anymore. By Week 11, you either have a culture that wins close games, a roster that believes in the system, and donors who are writing checks – or you’re watching your career circle the drain in real-time. This is where coaches earn their next contract or start quietly updating their resumes. This is where athletic directors stop taking “we’ll turn it around” phone calls and start having very different conversations. Week 11 separates the programs that are building something real from those that are just delaying the inevitable. And for these ten coaches? We break each situation down below:

1. Jonathan Smith, Michigan State

Jonathan Smith is sitting on a $33M-$37M buyout that’s paid out over 62 monthly installments – the kind of number that makes firing him financially painful but not impossible. The problem? He’s already lost his fan base after humiliating losses, recruiting is cratering, and donors are hesitant to continue funding a sinking ship. New AD J Batt inherited this mess and now faces a massive decision to either force Smith to turn it around immediately or mobilize donors to eat the buyout and start over. Michigan State isn’t just losing games – they’re losing their identity. Every day Smith remains in place is another day that elite recruits look elsewhere.

2. Mike Locksley, Maryland

Mike Locksley has lost the locker room, and everyone knows it. NIL chaos has players checked out, fourth-quarter collapses have become routine, and October was an unmitigated disaster that had fans chanting for his firing in the stadium. His seat is scorching, #2 on the hot seat rankings, but he’s got one lifeline: a legitimately strong 2025 recruiting class that’s making the administration hesitate before pulling the trigger. The job market is also flooded with high-profile openings, which might give him a reprieve simply because Maryland doesn’t want to get into a bidding war and strike out. But make no mistake: donor support is evaporating, administration confidence is gone, and Locksley is one more ugly loss away from a Sunday morning firing.

3. Mike Norvell, Florida State

Mike Norvell dropped from #1 to #3 on the hot seat after a win over Wake Forest and enough player support to give the administration cover to hesitate on his $55M+ buyout. But dropping two spots isn’t a victory – it’s a temporary reprieve. He barely survived recent board meetings where his future was debated in real-time, boosters are in open revolt, and fan skepticism is at an all-time high. Behind closed doors, FSU is already planning for 2026 when that buyout becomes more manageable. Questions about fit, contract structure, and whether this marriage ever made sense continue to linger. Norvell bought himself time, but one more blowout loss and he’s right back at #1.

4. Luke Fickell, Wisconsin

Luke Fickell is torching every ounce of goodwill he built at Cincinnati, and it’s happening fast. Multiple blowout losses and a stagnant offense have Wisconsin fans throwing remotes through their TVs, while recruiting momentum has completely flatlined. The administration isn’t just disappointed, they’re demanding foundational change, the kind of language that means “fix this NOW or we’re moving on.” Recent staff decisions have only accelerated skepticism, and fan patience has completely evaporated, with social media ablaze and calling for a reset. The only thing keeping Fickell employed is his buyout, but donors are starting to ask the question every coach dreads: “How much would it actually cost to start over?” One more embarrassing loss, and that buyout begins looking like a bargain.

5. Justin Wilcox, California

Justin Wilcox has mastered the art of losing games in the fourth quarter, and Cal fans have moved past frustration into full acceptance mode. Navigating conference realignment chaos while failing to elevate recruiting has left the program stagnant at a time when adaptation is everything. The death knell? Donors have checked out completely; they’ve stopped writing checks, stopped believing in the vision, and started asking pointed questions about ROI. Doubts about future competitiveness aren’t whispers anymore; they’re loud conversations in booster meetings. Wilcox isn’t just on shaky ground – he’s standing on a fault line, and everyone is waiting for the earthquake.

6. Bill Belichick, North Carolina

Bill Belichick at North Carolina was supposed to be a revolution with six Super Bowl rings, transforming college football. Instead, it’s looking like a very expensive mistake. One Power Four win. Bowl eligibility hanging by a thread. And a coaching style built for NFL veterans that doesn’t translate to 18-year-olds who need recruiting, not drafting. The administration is losing patience fast because elite prospects are looking at UNC and seeing chaos, not a championship pedigree. Recruiting hasn’t improved; it has actually gotten worse. The contract details are murky but undoubtedly expensive, the kind of money that looked brilliant when everyone thought he’d win immediately and catastrophic now that he’s not. The experiment is failing, and everyone is watching to see how quickly UNC pulls the plug.

7. Shane Beamer, South Carolina

Shane Beamer fired his offensive coordinator and offensive line coach mid-season, a desperate move that screams “I’m fighting for my life.” And it might not be enough. Insiders are saying it plainly: unless South Carolina rallies for bowl eligibility, Beamer is done. Booster support is crumbling fast, with the money people who once championed his energy and “South Carolina guy” credentials now demanding answers about results. Pressure is coming from everywhere—fans, administration, donors—all pointing to the same conclusion: the current vision isn’t working. Recruiting is getting massacred by staff instability, because elite prospects don’t commit to programs where coaches are getting fired mid-season and the head coach’s future is a weekly radio debate. Beamer bought himself time with those firings, but bowl eligibility isn’t just a goal anymore—it’s a job requirement.

8. Tim Beck, Coastal Carolina

Tim Beck still has the backing of Coastal Carolina’s administration, thanks to recent bowl appearances, but that institutional patience has an expiration date that’s approaching quickly. Competitive culture is struggling in a Sun Belt where parity is real, and roster retention has become a nightmare in the portal era. Donors aren’t panicking yet, they’re not calling for his head yet, but they’re watching, whispering, and starting to ask the question every coach dreads: “What happens if we miss a bowl game this year?” That’s the line in the sand. Miss the postseason and the conversation changes overnight from “let’s give him more time” to “maybe it’s time for a new direction.” Beck has a lifeline, but it’s fraying fast.

9. Dave Aranda, Baylor

Dave Aranda’s shine has completely worn off at Baylor, and the 2021 Big 12 Championship feels like ancient history. A mediocre record, zero championship buzz, and a fan base that has moved from “trust the process” to “what exactly IS the process?” has the administration and boosters doing more than watching—they’re calculating buyout logistics. That’s not hot seat attention; that’s death row. The donor base is eroding, checking out, and wondering if their money is being invested wisely. Recruiting momentum is slowing to a crawl because elite prospects can smell uncertainty from a mile away. Aranda needs a strong finish, not just bowl eligibility, but something that reminds people why Baylor hired him in the first place. Because right now? Nobody remembers, and that’s the most dangerous position any coach can be in.

10. Mark Stoops, Kentucky

Mark Stoops was this close to being fired before a dramatic win at Auburn bought him a reprieve, but one victory doesn’t erase a multi-year SEC losing streak. Years of being demolished by conference opponents have left Kentucky feeling more like a basketball school’s side project than a legitimate SEC program, and the administration has had legitimate conversations about buyout numbers and replacement candidates. The buyout is sizeable but not insurmountable, meaning if things go south again, Kentucky can afford to move on. Stoops needs two things immediately: roster confidence (players who believe they can compete in the SEC) and donor confidence (boosters who believe their money isn’t being wasted). Both are shaky right now. The remaining games aren’t just about bowl eligibility; they’re about survival, and everyone is watching.

Where does your coach rank?

Check out the complete rankings for all 136 FBS coaches here.

Want the full story on every coaching hot seat in America?

Newsletter subscribers get the expanded treatment, deep dives on each of the top 10 coaches, game previews that actually matter, and curated stories about coaching moves and timely college football topics delivered straight to their inbox every Tuesday and Friday during the season. No fluff. No filler. Just the insider information you need to stay ahead of the coaching carousel before it becomes headlines everywhere else. This isn’t just another college football newsletter—it’s your edge on understanding the power dynamics, buyout negotiations, and behind-the-scenes pressure that determines who stays and who goes. Subscribe here and get the complete picture twice a week.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

Two Hot Seat Coaches Meet At Auburn: One Will Buy Time, The Other Runs Out Of Runway

Mark Haines on October 30, 2025

This isn’t just another SEC game.

This is a referendum on two coaches fighting for their jobs. Mark Stoops sits at #16 on the Coaches Hot Seat rankings (and trending in the wrong direction). Hugh Freeze checks in at #5, which means every single game is an audition for next season.

Auburn hosts Kentucky at Jordan-Hare Stadium, and one of these coaches is going to walk away with some much-needed breathing room. The other? He’s going to feel the heat cranking up to uncomfortable levels. One coach survives this weekend. The other watches his seat get hotter.

Let me break down why this game matters more than the talking heads on ESPN will tell you.

The Stakes Are Ridiculous

Mark Stoops has one of the biggest buyouts in college football history.

Kentucky isn’t just paying him to be mediocre – they’re paying him an insane amount of money they can’t afford to get out of. And what has he delivered in 2025? An 0-5 record in SEC play. Zero wins against conference opponents.

That’s a pattern, not a slump

Meanwhile, Hugh Freeze is sitting at #5 on the hot seat, and Auburn fans are already questioning whether he’s the answer. The Tigers are 1-4 in SEC play, which isn’t great, but it’s also not catastrophic. A win against Kentucky doesn’t just improve his record; it moves him down the rankings and buys him real equity with the boosters.

This is coaching survival mode, and both guys know it.

Let’s Talk Numbers (Because They Don’t Lie)

If you’re a bettor or just someone who likes to understand how football works, the stats tell you everything you need to know.

Kentucky’s offense is barely functional against SEC defenses:

  • 24.1 points per game overall, but only 19.4 against SEC opponents
  • Just 121.6 rushing yards per game in SEC play (their ground game gets completely shut down)
  • When you can’t run, you become one-dimensional, and when you’re one-dimensional against good defenses, you lose

Auburn’s defense is where they have Kentucky beat:

  • Just 21.1 points allowed per game
  • Best run defense in this matchup, opponents average only 84.1 rushing yards
  • Kentucky’s weakness meets Auburn’s strength and that’s the ballgame

But here’s where it gets interesting:

Auburn’s offense isn’t exactly lighting the world on fire either. They’re balanced, 170 passing yards, 170 rushing yards per game. But in SEC play, those numbers crater. The difference? Auburn doesn’t turn the ball over. They average just 0.5 turnovers per game compared to Kentucky’s 1.6.

In close games, that margin is everything.

The Matchup That Decides Everything

Here’s the reality:

Kentucky cannot run the ball against Auburn’s front seven. That’s not opinion, that’s what the numbers tell us. When Kentucky is forced to throw on every down, their offensive line breaks down, their quarterback gets pressured, and the whole operation falls apart.

Could Kentucky exploit Auburn’s secondary?

Auburn’s been vulnerable through the air, they’re allowing 234.4 passing yards per game. But Kentucky hasn’t shown the ability to exploit that kind of weakness all season. Their passing game improves against MAC teams and collapses against SEC defenses.

There’s no reason to believe this week will be different.

By the Numbers: Complete Matchup Breakdown

If you want to bet this game, or understand who actually has the advantage, here’s the tale of the tape:

Auburn holds decisive advantages in the categories that matter most.

The X-Factor You’re Not Thinking About

Home-field advantage matters.

Auburn’s home splits show they gain approximately 20 yards and 4 points per game at Jordan-Hare Stadium. Kentucky is 0-2 on the road this season. They can’t win away from Lexington. The math is simple: Auburn plays better at home, and Kentucky falls apart on the road.

Here’s what that means for this game:

Auburn’s offensive line will control the line of scrimmage against Kentucky’s weak front seven. The Tigers will run the ball down Kentucky’s throat in the fourth quarter when the Wildcats’ defense is gassed. Kentucky won’t be able to match that physicality. They haven’t been able to all season.

This is where games are won and lost.

The Bottom Line

Auburn wins by 7-10 points.

Predicted score: Auburn 27, Kentucky 17

This isn’t rocket science. Auburn’s run defense shuts down Kentucky’s already-struggling ground game. Kentucky becomes one-dimensional. Auburn’s balanced offense exploits a weak Kentucky defense. The Tigers control time of possession and wear down the Wildcats in the second half.

The coaching implications are massive:

Hugh Freeze gets a much-needed win and some breathing room on the hot seat. Mark Stoops watches his seat get even hotter as Kentucky falls to 0-6 in SEC play. One coach buys himself time. The other runs out of runway.

For Kentucky to pull off the upset, they’d need:

  • Their passing game to suddenly become elite
  • Auburn to commit multiple turnovers
  • A complete defensive transformation

None of those things is happening.

The Bigger Picture

This is what college football has become in 2025.

Every game is an evaluation. Every loss adds weight to the hot seat. Coaches like Mark Stoops and Hugh Freeze aren’t just competing against each other—they’re competing against impossible expectations, impatient boosters, and the reality that one bad season can end a career.

Kentucky vs Auburn isn’t just about which team wins—it’s about which coach survives. And when you look at the numbers, Auburn has every statistical advantage. The Tigers should win this game comfortably.

Auburn 27, Kentucky 17.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

Brian Kelly Is Out at LSU—And the Coaching Carousel Just Got Absolutely Insane

Mark Haines on October 27, 2025

The coaching carousel just claimed its biggest name yet.

Brian Kelly is out at LSU. Fired. Done. Less than 24 hours after a humiliating 49-25 home loss to Texas A&M—after running into the locker room while students chanted “Fire Kelly,” after being forced to come back out and sing the alma mater with his players—LSU finally pulled the trigger. But this wasn’t a simple firing. This was a full-blown confrontation that spiraled out of control.

Here’s what happened.

The Dramatic Showdown That Ended It All

Sunday afternoon, according to The Athletic’s Bruce Feldman and Ralph D. Russo.

Brian Kelly and athletic director Scott Woodward meet. Woodward wants staff changes. Specifically, he wants Kelly to fire offensive coordinator Joe Sloan. LSU’s offense ranks dead last in the SEC in rushing. Something has to give. Kelly fires back. If we’re making staff changes, he says, I want to make different changes. Ones Woodward isn’t comfortable with.

Things get tense.

The conversation escalates. Kelly pushes back hard against his boss. Threats about negotiating Kelly’s $53 million buyout come up. But there’s a question: will the LSU Board of Supervisors even give Woodward the authority to do that?

By Sunday night, it’s over.

Kelly is out. A team meeting is called for 8 p.m. Associate head coach Frank Wilson is named interim head coach. Tight ends coach Alex Atkins will take over play-calling duties. And on Monday morning, LSU announces they’ve fired Sloan anyway. “When Coach Kelly arrived at LSU four years ago, we had high hopes that he would lead us to multiple SEC and national championships during his time in Baton Rouge,” Woodward said in the release. “Ultimately, the success at the level that LSU demands simply did not materialize.”

Translation: You didn’t win enough.

The Wildest Coaching Carousel Year in Recent Memory

But here’s the thing: Kelly isn’t the only one.

This has been one of the most chaotic coaching carousel seasons in years. Jobs are opening everywhere:

  • Penn State
  • LSU
  • Florida
  • Oklahoma State
  • Arkansas
  • Virginia Tech
  • UCLA
  • Stanford

And that’s just so far.

Florida State and Oklahoma could be next. Maybe others. The competition for top candidates is going to be insane. Top-tier schools like Florida, LSU, and Penn State are in their own tier—massive resources, elite NIL, phenomenal facilities. But even they’re going to have to pay up. Big time.

Agents are salivating.

Salaries are about to get wildly inflated. And how many of these coaches will actually complete their contracts without needing to be bought out? History says not many. But here’s the question nobody wants to ask: Who are these schools actually going to hire?

And that leads to an even more uncomfortable question for programs down the ladder.

If You’re Cal (Or Nevada, Or Louisiana Tech), What Do You Do?

Let’s talk about the schools further down the food chain for a second.

If you’re Cal, what do you do? Justin Wilcox has been there for nine years. No winning seasons since 2019. The program is stuck in mediocrity. Do you fire him and jump into this insane market where every coach’s price just tripled? Do you keep investing in a guy who hasn’t delivered? If you’re Nevada, do you pay the $2.7 million buyout for Jeff Choate and try to compete with Penn State and LSU for the same candidate pool? If you’re Louisiana Tech, do you cut ties with Sonny Cumbie and hope you can find someone better in a market that’s about to be picked clean?

The reality is brutal.

The top jobs are going to snap up the top candidates. Everyone else will be fighting over the scraps. Or they’re going to have to roll the dice on assistant coaches and hope they hit on the next Cignetti. Schools like Vanderbilt, Missouri, Tulane, North Texas, Memphis, Wake Forest, and Boise State have coaches who are prime poaching targets. And they won’t have the money to keep them if the big boys come calling.

It’s a bad year to be a mid-tier program with an up-and-coming coach.

So, Who Is LSU Going to Get That’s Better Than Brian Kelly?

Which brings us back to the biggest question of all.

Think about Kelly’s résumé for a second:

  • Two Division II national championships
  • Took Cincinnati to 11-1 and a top-4 finish
  • Took Notre Dame to two national championship games
  • Ten top-25 finishes at Notre Dame, half of them in the top 10
  • Won 10 games in each of his first two seasons at LSU with top-15 finishes
  • Won 9 games last year
  • On pace for 8 wins this year

That’s not a bad coach.

That’s an excellent coach who didn’t meet LSU’s sky-high expectations. So who’s the upgrade? The names being thrown around: Lane Kiffin, Marcus Freeman, Brent Key, Eli Drinkwitz, Jon Sumrall. Are those guys sure things? Are they going to be infinitely better than Kelly?

Nobody knows.

LSU is about to spend $100 million (or more) buying out Kelly and his staff, then funding a new coaching staff, to get someone who might be better. It’s a massive gamble. Here’s the reality: You’re going to spend probably $100M buying out your previous coaching staff and funding your new one to get someone that isn’t necessarily a sure thing. It’s not like Brian Kelly was going 4-8.

And here’s the kicker.

Unless LSU is bringing back Nick Saban, Chris Petersen, or Urban Meyer from retirement, there isn’t a candidate out there who’s a sure thing. Lane Kiffin is going to make a fortune – either from Ole Miss giving him a massive raise to stay, or from one of these desperate schools throwing ridiculous money at him. Brian Kelly won’t be out of work long. Neither will James Franklin, who Penn State moved on from. They’re outstanding coaches. The problem is they weren’t great enough for programs with championship-or-bust expectations.

And that’s the new reality of college football.

What’s Next?

The carousel is spinning.

Fast. More jobs will open. More coaches will get massive paydays. More schools will regret the contracts they’re about to hand out. In about four years, a lot of these fan bases are going to be asking: “Why did we give him that contract?!”

But right now?

It’s chaos. And LSU is right in the middle of it.

Stay tuned.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES

Blog Article

Kentucky Has Faced The SEC’s 9th-Toughest Schedule This Season. Here’s Why Their 2-4 Record And 16.7 Points Per Game Against Quality Defenses Means Tennessee Wins By 20+ On Saturday

Mark Haines on October 24, 2025

Here’s what nobody’s talking about:

Kentucky has faced one of the most brutal schedules in college football this season. They’ve gone toe-to-toe with Georgia, Texas, and Ole Miss—all top-25 programs with elite defenses. And despite sitting at 2-4, they took Texas to overtime, losing 16-13, a game that showed real defensive grit. On paper, this looks like a team tested by fire and capable of giving Tennessee problems.

But here’s the problem.

Their offense cannot score. Against Power Five competition, Kentucky averages just 16.7 points per game. Their wins came against MAC opponents Toledo and Eastern Michigan—teams that made them look competent. Strip those away, and you’re staring at an offense that can’t sustain drives, can’t convert third downs, and can’t throw touchdowns.

And when Tennessee’s explosive attack takes the field on Saturday, that weakness gets exposed.

The Numbers Don’t Lie (Even When You Adjust For Competition)

Let’s cut through the noise and look at what actually matters.

Tennessee averages 511 yards per game. Kentucky averages 342. But you might say, “Tennessee played East Tennessee State and UAB—those stats are inflated.” Fair point. So let’s adjust for competition and see if the gap closes or widens.

Here’s what happens when you filter the data:

  • Tennessee vs Power Five opponents: 470 yards per game, 6.4 yards per play
  • Tennessee vs Georgia (No. 6): 496 yards, 41 points in overtime loss
  • Kentucky vs Power Five opponents: 314 yards per game, 4.5 yards per play
  • Kentucky vs Top-50 defenses: 16.7 points per game

Even after removing the cupcakes, Tennessee still ranks as an elite offense. They dropped 496 yards on Georgia—one of the nation’s best defenses—and pushed them to overtime. Meanwhile, Kentucky’s offense craters against quality competition.

The gap isn’t closing. It’s widening.

Kentucky’s Offense Has One Fatal Flaw

They can’t convert third downs.

With a 39% third-down conversion rate, Kentucky’s offense sputters every time they face third-and-medium. They average 0.7 passing touchdowns per game—that’s less than one per game—and their quarterback play has been inconsistent at best. Against SEC defenses, they’ve managed just 314 yards and 16.7 points per game.

Here’s what that means in real terms:

  • Kentucky goes three-and-out repeatedly
  • Their defense faces 70+ plays from Tennessee
  • By the third quarter, their defense is gassed
  • Tennessee pulls away in the second half

You can have the best defense in the world, but if you can’t score points, you can’t win football games.

Tennessee’s Tempo Is Going To Break Kentucky’s Defense

Here’s where this game gets decided.

Tennessee runs 75 plays per game—one of the fastest tempo offenses in the SEC. They come out firing with quick-strike drives, play-action deep shots, and an offensive line that creates lanes for their running backs. Kentucky’s defense has been respectable this season, holding opponents to 365 yards per game and forcing field goals in the red zone.

But sustained tempo breaks defenses.

By the third quarter, Tennessee’s depth shows. Kentucky’s defensive backs are chasing receivers on seam routes. Their linebackers are gassed from covering slot receivers. And Tennessee’s offensive line starts imposing its will. We’ve seen this movie before with Kentucky—they hang in for a half, then get blown out in the second half.

When you can’t score points, you can’t afford to let the other team dictate tempo.

The Georgia Game Told Us Everything We Needed To Know

Both teams played Georgia this season.

Let’s compare the results:

  • Tennessee vs Georgia: Lost 44-41 in overtime, 496 yards, 41 points
  • Kentucky vs Georgia: Lost 35-14, 270 yards, 14 points

That’s a 226-yard difference in offensive production against the same elite defense. Tennessee took one of the nation’s best teams to overtime in a game they arguably should’ve won. Kentucky got boat-raced at home.

If that doesn’t tell you everything about the offensive gap, nothing will.

The 3 X-Factors That Will Decide This Game

Let’s break down the key matchups.

1. Can Kentucky Convert Third Downs?

Kentucky’s offense lives and dies on third down. With a 39% conversion rate and Tennessee’s aggressive blitz packages coming off the edge, this could get ugly fast. If Kentucky can’t sustain drives, their defense faces 12-14 possessions.

That’s too many.

2. Red Zone Execution

Kentucky’s defense has been elite at limiting passing touchdowns—just 0.5 per game allowed. They force teams to kick field goals. But Tennessee’s balanced attack gives them multiple ways to score inside the 20. Touchdowns vs field goals will determine if this is a close game or a blowout.

Early touchdown conversions blow this game open by halftime.

3. Turnovers

This is Kentucky’s only path to an upset. If they can force 2-3 turnovers and create short fields, maybe—MAYBE—their limited offense can cobble together 20-24 points. But Tennessee’s been relatively careful with the ball (1.4 turnovers per game), and Kentucky isn’t exactly a ballhawking defense.

Betting on Kentucky to win the turnover battle by +2? That’s wishful thinking.

What Kentucky Needs To Do (Spoiler: It Won’t Be Enough)

Let’s game this out.

For Kentucky to pull off the upset, they need:

  • Win the turnover battle by +2 or more
  • Convert 50%+ of third downs (well above their season average)
  • Hold Tennessee under 400 total yards
  • Make every field goal attempt (they’re shooting 69% this season)

Even if Kentucky does ALL of those things, they still need to score 24+ points to have a chance. And against quality competition, they average 16.7 points per game. The math doesn’t work. The matchups don’t work. The tempo doesn’t work.

Kentucky can play inspired football for a half.

They can keep it close through sheer defensive discipline and field position management. But eventually—probably by early third quarter—Tennessee’s offensive firepower breaks through. And when it does, Kentucky doesn’t have the offensive capability to answer.

How This Game Plays Out

Here’s the quarter-by-quarter breakdown:

First Quarter: Tennessee establishes tempo. Quick three-and-out for Kentucky. Tennessee scores on a six-play, 73-yard drive capped by a play-action touchdown. 7-0 Vols.

Second Quarter: Kentucky strings together a decent drive using their run game and short passes. They stall in the red zone. Field goal. 7-3. Tennessee answers immediately with another touchdown drive. Kentucky gets another field goal before half. 17-10 Tennessee at halftime.

Third Quarter: This is where the game breaks open. Tennessee’s depth starts showing. Kentucky’s defense is gassed from defending 40+ plays in the first half. Tennessee rips off two scoring drives. Kentucky’s offense goes three-and-out twice. 31-13 Tennessee.

Fourth Quarter: Garbage time. Tennessee runs clock. Kentucky adds a late touchdown against prevent defense.

Final score: 38-17.

The Bottom Line

Look, I get it.

Kentucky has played a brutal schedule. They’ve faced a murderer’s row in the SEC, and their 2-4 record doesn’t fully reflect their defensive competence. They took Texas to overtime. They hung with Georgia for a half. This is a program that’s been battle-tested against elite competition.

But here’s the reality:

Their offense is one-dimensional. Their scoring ceiling against quality competition is 17-20 points. And Tennessee’s offense—even when you adjust for weak competition—is legitimately elite. 470 yards per game against Power Five teams. 6.4 yards per play. An up-tempo attack that wears down defenses. Home field advantage in Neyland Stadium.

Unless Tennessee commits 3+ turnovers, this game isn’t really in doubt.

Kentucky will keep it respectable for a half. But by the time the third quarter rolls around, Tennessee’s superior depth, tempo, and offensive firepower will have pulled away. The final score won’t be 50-10—Kentucky’s defense is too disciplined for that.

But a two-to-three score Tennessee victory? That’s not just likely—it’s inevitable.

Tennessee 38, Kentucky 17

Statistical Projections

Tennessee: 465-490 total yards | 38-41 points | 295 pass yards | 175 rush yards | 1 turnover

Kentucky: 300-320 total yards | 17-20 points | 190 pass yards | 120 rush yards | 2 turnovers

3 Keys To Watch

Tennessee’s first quarter tempo: If they jump out to a 14-0 or 17-3 lead early, Kentucky’s offense doesn’t have the firepower to dig out.

Kentucky’s third-down efficiency: They MUST convert 50%+ to sustain drives. Anything less and their defense faces 70+ plays.

Red zone execution: Touchdowns vs field goals will determine if this is a close game or a blowout.

Final Thought

The spread on this game should be Tennessee by 17-21 points. Kentucky’s offense is the limiting factor. You can have the best defense in the world, but if you can’t score points, you can’t win football games. And against Tennessee’s explosive attack, 17 points isn’t going to cut it.

Tennessee rolls. Kentucky fights hard for a half. But class—and offensive firepower—wins out.

BACK TO THE BLOG ARCHIVE
No related posts found.
VISIT OUR SHOP [COMING SOON]

LOAD MORE BLOG ARTICLES